4.A. Consider approval of the minutes from the June 15, 2026 regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission.

[4.B. Public Hearing and Consideration of Plat 2026-128-P Quail Creek Addition Unit No. 41 An addition to the City of Amarillo, being a replat of a portion of Lot 103 and all of Lot 104, Block 12, Quail Creek Addition Unit No. 30, in Section 25, Block 9, B.S.& F. Survey, Potter County, Texas. (VICINITY: Baccus Dr. & Reserve Ct.; APPLICANT/S: OJD Engineering, LLC for Brice Graham)]

PLAT 2026-128-P. QUAIL CREEK ADDITION UNIT NUMBER 41.

YES, THIS IS A QUAIL CREEK ADDITION, UNIT NUMBER 41.

THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF AMARILLO, LOCATED IN POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS, IN THE VICINITY OF BAUCUS DRIVE AND RESERVE COURT.

IT IS A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 103 AND ALL OF LOT 104, BLOCK 12, QUAIL CREEK ADDITION UNIT 30 AND THE APPLICANT IS OJD ENGINEERING LLC FOR BRICE GRAHAM. AND ESSENTIALLY THEY ARE TAKING TWO UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND COMBINING IT INTO A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL LOT TO CONSTRUCT A NEW HOME ON THE PROPERTY. AND SINCE THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL REPLAT, IT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE AND A PUBLIC HEARING AND IS THE REASON IT'S BEFORE Y'ALL TODAY.

IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CITY AND OUR TYPICAL EXTERNAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND WAS FOUND TO CONFORM WITH THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, EXCEPT FOR CORRECTED ORIGINALS NOT YET BEING RECEIVED PUBLIC NOTICE WISE, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS AS OF THIS MEETING ON THIS ITEM.

AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PLAT AS PRESENTED WITH THE CONDITION THAT CORRECTED ORIGINALS ARE RECEIVED.

THANK YOU BRADY. COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR BRADY AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS ITEM. HEARING AND SEEING NONE AT THIS TIME, COMMISSIONERS WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE. THE REQUEST THAT STAFF RECOMMENDED PENDING THE RETURN OF.

THANK YOU JOSH. SECOND BY DICK. ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE AYE. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO ITEM 4.C CONSIDERATION OF PLAT 2026-125-P

[4.C. Consideration of Plat 2026-125-P C.W.C. Enterprises Unit No. 3 An addition to the City of Amarillo, being a replat of Lot 2B & 2C, Block 1, Exxon Addition Unit No. 2, Lot 1, Block 1, C.W.C. Enterprises Unit No. 1, Lot 2, Block 1, C.W.C. Enterprises Unit No. 2 and vacated alley right of way, all in Section 74, Block 2, AB&M Survey, Potter County, Texas. (VICINITY: Interstate 40 & Loop 335/Lakeside Dr.; APPLICANT/S: Foresite Group, LLC for Racetrac, Inc.)]

CWC ENTERPRISES UNIT NUMBER THREE. BRADY. YEAH.

SO THIS PLOT IS AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF AMARILLO, AND IT IS A REPLAT OF LOTS TWO B AND TWO C BLOCK ONE X ON ADDITION UNIT NUMBER TWO, LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE, CWC ENTERPRISES UNIT ONE AND LOT TWO, BLOCK ONE, CW ENTERPRISES, UNIT NUMBER TWO, AND PLUS A PORTION OF A VACATED ALLEY. THIS IS LOCATED IN POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE AND THE VICINITY OF INTERSTATE 40 AND LAKESIDE DRIVE, AND THE APPLICANT IS FORESITE GROUP LLC FOR RACE TRAC INCORPORATED, AND THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY COMBINING A NUMBER OF PLATTED PROPERTIES AND A VACATED ALLEY

[00:05:06]

TO CREATE A SITE FOR A TRUCK STOP AND CONVENIENCE STORE.

THE RACETRACK BRAND. MORE SPECIFICALLY, THIS HAS, THIS REQUIRES CONSIDERATION AS IT IS A FINAL PLOT THAT HAD ASSOCIATED PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. I BELIEVE A WATER MAIN EXTENSION THAT WAS NEEDED FOR THIS PROJECT.

AND THAT IS THE REASON IT IS BEFORE YOU ALL TODAY.

IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY CITY STAFF AND THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND WAS FOUND TO CONFORM WITH THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, EXCEPT FOR SURETY NOT YET BEING PROVIDED OR CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS BEING COMPLETED AS OF THE MEETING TODAY AND CORRECTED ORIGINALS NOT YET BEING PROVIDED.

WITH ALL THAT BEING SAID, WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS PLOT AS PRESENTED WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT CORRECTED ORIGINALS ARE RECEIVED AND THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE EITHER CONSTRUCTED OR SURETY PROVIDED FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS.

THANK YOU. BRADY. COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR BRADY AT THIS TIME OR THE STAFF? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS ITEM. HEARING AND SEEING NONE, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION AT THIS TIME.

COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU DICK. SECOND IS BY LANDON. WAS THAT YOU? SORRY, I WASN'T LOOKING.

ALL RIGHT, ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL OPPOSED? NO. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. BRADY. ITEM 4.D CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCES ASSOCIATED WITH PRELIMINARY PLAN

[4.D. Consideration of Variance/s Associated with Preliminary Plan 2026-114-PP Caprock Landing This item considers the request for a variance from the requirement to provide alleys for a proposed subdivision and from the requirement that the system of streets designated for a subdivision must connect with streets already dedicated in adjacent subdivisions. The development under consideration for the just mentioned variances is Caprock Landing, approximately 22.28 acres of unplatted land, in Section 107, Block 2, A.B.& M. Survey, Potter County and Randall County,Texas. (VICINITY: SE 29th Ave. & S. Eastern St.; APPLICANT/S: Geospatial Data, Inc. for Christolie Limited)]

2026-114-PP CAPROCK LANDING. YES. SO THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU ALL TODAY IS TO CONSIDER A COUPLE OF VARIANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE NOTED PRELIMINARY PLAN, SPECIFICALLY A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE ALLEYS FOR A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION, AND FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE SYSTEM OF STREETS DESIGNATED FOR A SUBDIVISION MUST CONNECT WITH STREETS ALREADY DEDICATED IN ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS.

THIS IS 22.28 ACRES OF UNPLATTED LAND IN RANDALL COUNTY, TEXAS AND POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS AND IS LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF SOUTHEAST 29TH AVENUE AND SOUTHEASTERN STREET. AND THE APPLICANT IS GEOSPATIAL DATA INC.

FOR CHRISTOLIE LIMITED. AND AS MENTIONED, THOSE TWO VARIANCES, THE FIRST ONE BEING THE ALLEY WAIVER, WHICH IS 4-6-53B, AND THE OTHER ABOUT CONNECTING TO ADJACENT STREETS, WHICH IS SECTION 4-6-53A9. THOSE ARE THE TWO SPECIFIC CODE SECTIONS.

THE FIRST ONE YOU'VE SEEN QUITE A BIT, AND THEN THE SECOND ONE IS A LITTLE MORE UNIQUE TO THE SITUATION. SO I'LL DIVE INTO IT A LITTLE MORE DETAIL ON THAT ONE HERE IN A SECOND.

SO REGARDING CAPROCK LANDING, THIS IS A PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF EASTERN STREET, NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF 29TH AVENUE. AND IT'S PROPOSED TO CONTAIN 130 LOTS THAT ARE TO BE ZONED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT THREE FOR DETACHED HOMES.

AND THIS SECTION OF LAND IS A LITTLE INTERESTING.

IT'S DIVIDED AMONG A VARIETY OF LAND USE AND ZONING OUT THERE.

IN ADDITION, ONE OF THE MAIN CANADIAN RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHORITY PIPELINES RUN THROUGH THIS SECTION AND ADDITIONALLY PORTIONS OF IT ARE IN THE AIRPORT OVERLAY. SO THIS, SO THE APPLICANT'S TRACT IS AT THE SOUTHWEST WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SECTION, WHILE THE SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR IS ZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ESSENTIALLY.

AND IN THE REMAINDER OF THE SECTION IS THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ALONG I-40, ALONG WITH THE PLATTED BUT UNDEVELOPED BEL AIRE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION THERE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER THAT YOU CAN KIND OF SEE ON THE MAP THERE, ALL THOSE PLOTTED LOTS.

AND WE'LL DIVE INTO THAT HERE IN A SECOND. THAT AREA WAS PLATTED IN 1951 BUT WAS NEVER CONSTRUCTED.

IT CONTAINS 370 LOTS THAT ARE NOW OWNED BY 161 DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNERS.

SO ESSENTIALLY THAT DEVELOPMENT LARGELY FAILED ONCE THE AIR BASE CLOSED.

SO ESSENTIALLY WE HAVE A NUMBER OF THESE SUBDIVISIONS LIKE THIS ACROSS THE CITY WHERE THESE SUBDIVISIONS EXIST.

THE LOTS GET AUCTIONED ONLINE ALL THE TIME. AND NOW THEY'RE OWNED BY A WIDE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNERS, WHICH MAKES DEVELOPMENT OF THOSE PRETTY DIFFICULT TO OCCUR.

DIVING INTO THE ALLEYS REAL QUICK. WHEN CONSIDERING A REQUEST FOR NO ALLEYS WE JUST HAVE TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR SERVICES TYPICALLY PROVIDED IN ALLEYS ARE BEING ACCOUNTED FOR. IN THIS CASE, THE UTILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAYS IN FRONT OF THE LOTS, ALONG WITH ACCESS AND. ADDITIONALLY, WE DID SEND THIS TO OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT COULD BE SERVED WITH CART SERVICE, WHICH THEY STATED THEY HAD THE CAPACITY TO AND DID NOT OBJECT TO SERVING THIS WITH CARTS.

[00:10:05]

SO THEY DID TAKE A LOOK AT THAT AND BELIEVE THAT THEY HAD THE CAPABILITY TO DO THAT.

AND THEN DIVING BACK INTO THAT SECOND VARIANCE.

WE'LL FOCUS IN KIND OF ON THE NORTH END OF THE DEVELOPMENT HERE IN UNIT ONE, YOU CAN SEE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THAT PLOT OR OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, WHERE THOSE PLATTED STREETS AND ALLEYS AND LOTS ARE THERE TO THE NORTH IN BEL AIRE, WHERE THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE PROPERTIES HAVE NEVER BEEN DEVELOPED.

REGARDING WHAT THE ORDINANCE SAYS TYPICALLY IT STATES THAT THE SYSTEM OF STREETS DESIGNATED FOR SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT IN UNUSUAL CASES, MUST CONNECT WITH STREETS AND ALLEYS ALREADY DEDICATED AND ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS, AND THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS IS ONE OF THOSE SUCH UNUSUAL CASES, GIVEN THAT THE SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH.

OVER TIME, IT EXISTED BEFORE THE CITY'S REQUIREMENT FOR SURETY TO BE PROVIDED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE.

SO ESSENTIALLY, WE HAVE A PLATTED SUBDIVISION THAT'S SPLIT UP BETWEEN 161 DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNERS, AND THE ODDS THAT YOU'RE GOING TO GET ONE SINGLE PROPERTY OWNER ABLE TO OBTAIN ALL THOSE EVENTUALLY, OR GET THEM ALL TO AGREE ON THE SAME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT.

THE LIKELIHOOD OF THAT'S PRETTY LOW IN THE APPLICANT'S OPINION.

ADDITIONALLY I'LL MENTION THAT SOME OF THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE EVEN OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

SO IT'S A WIDE RANGE OF PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE COUNTRY, AND EVEN IN SOME CASES OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES THAT ACTUALLY OWN PROPERTIES.

AND FROM WHAT STAFF HAS SEEN OVER THE YEARS IN THAT BEL AIRE AREA, THOSE LOTS JUST GET AUCTIONED ALL THE TIME ONLINE FOR PRETTY LOW VALUES OF MONEY AND PEOPLE BY LOTS, ESSENTIALLY, BUT DON'T REALIZE THEY'RE BUYING IT IN THE MIDDLE OF A SUBDIVISION THAT DOESN'T HAVE UTILITIES, STREETS OR ALLEYS. SO.

SO THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHY THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING NOT TO TIE IN TO THOSE ALLEYS AND STREETS TO THE NORTH IS ESSENTIALLY THAT'S A SUBDIVISION THAT WILL LIKELY NEVER BE BUILT IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION. AND I'LL MENTION GOING BACK TO KIND OF THE OVERALL VIEW OF THE SECTION, YOU CAN SEE KIND OF AT THE NORTHEAST AND ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARIES OF THE BEL AIRE AREA, THAT THERE HAVE BEEN COMMERCIAL TRACKS FOR THOSE BUSINESSES ALONG I-40 THAT HAVE ESSENTIALLY BEEN ALLOWED TO PLAT WITHOUT EXTENDING OR CONNECTING IN STREETS TO THOSE TO THE, TO BEL AIRE. SO, SO IN THEIR OPINION, A PRECEDENT FOR WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR HAS ALREADY BEEN SET.

AND AS WE LOOK AT THE MAP, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES THAT ESSENTIALLY HAVE PLATTED OFF FUTURE ACCESS TO ALLOWING THOSE STREETS TO CONTINUE.

SO IT'S KIND OF A UNIQUE AND A MESSY SITUATION.

AND WE HAVE A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES OF THIS AROUND TOWN FROM AROUND THAT PERIOD OF TIME AT THE AIR BASE CLOSED.

SO THIS IS JUST ONE OF SEVERAL. AND ADDITIONALLY, WE'LL GO BACK TO THIS MAP.

TYING IN EASTWARD IS ALSO VIEWED AS NOT BEING FEASIBLE BECAUSE ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY HERE.

AND I HIGHLIGHTED IT THERE IN YELLOW AS WELL.

THAT'S THE 99 FOOT WIDE [INAUDIBLE] PIPELINE EASEMENT.

AND THEY HAVE VERY STRICT REGULATIONS ABOUT WHAT CAN BE NEAR OR OVER THE TOP OF THAT EASEMENT.

IN FACT, IF YOU WANT TO EVEN TIE ROADS ACROSS THAT, THEY HAVE TO, YOU HAVE TO DO SOME PRETTY EXTENSIVE LOAD RATING ON THOSE.

SO AND IN THAT, AND IN SOME CASES, KRONWALL DOESN'T EVEN THEN ALLOW STUFF TO CROSS THAT EASEMENT.

SO TYING IN BACK TO THE EAST, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THAT THERE'S PLANS TO AND ZONING OUT THERE FOR INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, IT'S HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT THIS SECTION WOULD EVER DEVELOP IN THE TRADITIONAL SENSE THAT YOU WOULD SEE RESIDENTIAL THROUGHOUT THROUGHOUT IT GIVEN THE EXISTING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS OUT THERE, ALONG WITH THE COMPLICATIONS OF THE AIRPORT NOISE BOUNDARY OUT THERE AS WELL FURTHER EAST, WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THAT CRIMINAL PIPELINE EASEMENT.

SO THERE'S A VARIETY OF INTERESTING FACTORS OUT HERE THAT THE APPLICANT BELIEVES KIND OF KEEPING HIS DEVELOPMENT MORE ISOLATED IN NATURE AND NOT TYING IN IS MORE APPROPRIATE. AND HONESTLY, THE MORE REALISTIC OPTION GIVEN SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT BARRIERS THAT EXIST OUT THERE.

SO KIND OF CONCLUDE OUR THOUGHTS CONSIDERING THE FACTS ABOVE RELATED TO THIS VARIANCE REQUEST STAFF IS OF THE OPINION THAT IF APPROVED, THE VARIANCES WOULD NOT RESULT IN DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS FOR THE AREA AND ARE READY FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COMMISSION.

IT IS NOTED THAT IF APPROVED, STAFF WILL BE ABLE TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAN ONCE ALL ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS ARE SATISFIED.

AS YOU ALL ARE JUST CONSIDERING THE TWO VARIANCES TODAY AND NOT THE DEVELOPMENT AS A WHOLE ITSELF.

SO WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN IT UP TO QUESTIONS. THANK YOU BRADY.

COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR BRADY AT THIS TIME? DICK COULD YOU TURN ON YOUR MIC. EXCUSE ME. I'M SORRY.

I THINK IT'S GREAT THAT WE'RE DOING SOME INFIELD DEVELOPMENT. CAN YOU PULL THE MIC CLOSER? SORRY, IT'S NOT PICKING YOU UP. I THINK IT'S GOOD THAT WE'RE DOING SOME INFIELD DEVELOPMENT. MY QUESTION IS, IS NOT RELATED TO THIS, BUT TO THE DEVELOPMENT NEXT DOOR.

[00:15:02]

I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A STATE LAW THAT WE CAN'T APPROVE A PLAT UNLESS THERE'S LEGAL ACCESS TO THE LOT.

IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. WHAT DO WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY ABOUT HAVING ALL THESE LOTS WITHOUT LEGAL ACCESS TO THEM? ARE WE TALKING ABOUT BEL AIRE? TO BEL AIRE? YEAH, BEL AIRE TO THE NORTH.

IT'S KIND OF AN INTERESTING SITUATION WHERE THOSE LOTS TECHNICALLY DO HAVE ACCESS TO PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY THEY'RE JUST NOT CONSTRUCTED.

BUT THAT THAT'S A, THAT WHOLE AREA IS JUST KIND OF AN INTERESTING SITUATION.

NOT SURE SPECIFICALLY ABOUT HOW THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY IMPACT US AS A CITY, BUT TECHNICALLY THOSE PLOTTED LOTS OUT THERE HAVE ACCESS.

IT'S JUST NOT CONSTRUCTED. SO. OKAY. THANK YOU.

OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME. THERE'S A LITTLE COMMENT I THINK I'VE TALKED TO YOU ALL ABOUT IT.

I HAVE SOME LAND DOWN SOUTH OF TEXAS THAT'S VERY SIMILAR SITUATION.

SO YEAH, I COMPLETELY SYMPATHIZE WITH HOW COMPLEX THAT SITUATION CAN BE, TRYING TO GET EVERYONE, ESPECIALLY IN MY SITUATION, SOME OF THE THE TITLE ISN'T CLEAR ON SOME OF THOSE LOTS.

SO.

FRED, COULD YOU TURN ON YOUR MIC? OKAY. YEAH.

CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT KIND OF A STREET IS 29TH STREET? IN TERMS OF LIKE A COLLECTOR VERSUS ARTERIALS? YEAH. RIGHT. I BELIEVE 29TH WOULD PROBABLY BE.

LET ME TAKE A LOOK HERE. IT'S DEFINITELY NOT AN ARTERIAL.

I WOULD SAY 29TH IS PROBABLY YOU COULD PROBABLY CONSIDER IT MAYBE A SMALLER COLLECTOR, PERHAPS BECAUSE IT KIND OF DOES FEED BACK THROUGH THAT SUBDIVISION THERE TO THE WEST AND ALL THE LOCAL STREETS KIND OF TIE INTO IT.

SO YOU COULD POTENTIALLY ARGUE THAT IT FUNCTIONS LIKE A COLLECTOR.

WOULD THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE LOTS PUT ANY EXTRA STRAIN ON 29TH STREET? I DON'T BELIEVE SO, BECAUSE ALL THESE LOTS DIRECTLY FEED ON THE EASTERN STREET.

SO I DON'T BELIEVE. AND GIVEN THE RELATIVELY LOW NUMBER OF LOTS.

AND GIVEN THAT THEY CIRCULATE ESSENTIALLY THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION AND BACK OUT ON THE EASTERN, I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'D BE MUCH OF A IMPACT THE 29TH, IF ANY.

OKAY. MOST OF THESE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE PROBABLY UTILIZE EASTERN FOR COMING TO AND FROM I-40 WOULD BE MY ASSUMPTION.

OKAY. AM I CORRECT THAT THAT WOULD BE EVALUATED AS PART OF THE SUBSEQUENT PROCESS FROM FROM WHAT WE'LL HAVE HAPPEN TODAY? CAN WHAT I'LL SAY IS THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS WILL GET REVIEWED.

BUT REGARDING TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, THE CITY OF AMARILLO DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT IN OUR ORDINANCE.

SO TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WOULD NOT BE A PART OF THAT.

OKAY. JOSH. JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THE DRAINAGE. IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE SLEEPING OUT ON THE EASEMENT.

AND DO YOU HAVE A WAY? ARE YOU CARRYING IT FORWARD OR TAKING IT TO THE [INAUDIBLE]? SO ESSENTIALLY THEY I BELIEVE THEY ARE PROPOSING THE WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER TO THE EAST THERE.

TIE THEM ACROSS NORTH SOUTH RUNNING EASEMENT, AND I BELIEVE THEY'LL TAKE IT SOUTHWARD TO WHATEVER THE NEXT RIGHT OF WAY IS, I BELIEVE IS THEIR PLAN. AND ONE THING THEY WILL HAVE TO DO ONCE THIS IS APPROVED, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO SUBMIT FOR THEIR DRAINAGE REPORT.

AND ULTIMATELY THEY'LL HAVE TO CLEAR THE REGULATIONS OF THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.

BUT THAT IS THEIR PLAN IS TO BASICALLY TAKE IT EAST AND THEN SOUTH TO THE TO THE NEXT RIGHT OF WAY.

I BELIEVE OR NOT SURE IF THERE'S A [INAUDIBLE] TO THE SOUTH OR NOT, BUT ESSENTIALLY THEY'LL TAKE IT EAST AND THEN SOUTH VIA EASEMENTS.

THANK YOU BRADY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK AGAINST THE ITEM. BRADY, BEFORE I CALL FOR A MOTION BASED ON JUST THE COMMENTS WE'VE HEARD FROM THE COMMISSION TODAY, IS THERE ANYTHING WE NEED TO KEEP IN? IF WE'RE ASSUMING THAT THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP ABOUT LEGAL.

THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP ABOUT DRAINAGE. THOSE QUESTIONS WILL ALL BE HEARD SUBSEQUENTLY IF THE PLAT MOVES FORWARD? YES, THOSE WILL ALL BE ITEMS THAT ARE EITHER ADDRESSED ADMINISTRATIVELY WITH STAFF OR ULTIMATELY BEFORE YOU ALL THROUGH THE PROCESSES THAT YOU ALL OVERSEE.

SO WE IF WE CRAFT A MOTION TO APPROVE BOTH OF THESE VARIANCES, WE DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT CRAFTING THAT MOTION WITH THAT LANGUAGE IN THEM.

THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, WE'LL TAKE THE BOTH ITEMS TOGETHER UNLESS WE HAVE A REQUEST TO BIFURCATE.

OKAY. AT THIS TIME, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE BOTH OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCES AS PROCEED AS PRESENTED.

YOUR TURN. YEAH. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE AS PRESENTED ON BOTH MOTIONS.

THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION BY LANDON. I'LL SECOND.

SECOND BY NOAH. ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU.

[00:20:09]

OKAY, WE'RE ON ITEM FOUR E, CORRECT? YES. THAT'S CORRECT.

[4.E. Public Hearing and Consideration of Rezoning 2026-58-Z Rezoning of Lot 2, Block 1, 66 Village Unit No. 2, an addition to the City of Amarillo, in Section 73, Block 2, A.B.& M. Survey, Potter County, Texas, plus one-half of all bounding streets, alleys, and public ways, to change from Light Industrial District to Light Industrial District with a Specific Use Permit for an Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (VICINITY: Triangle Dr. & Lakeside Dr. (Loop 335); APPLICANT/S: (OJD Engineering, LLC for Redline Cattle LLC)]

PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF REZONING.

ITEM NUMBER 2026-58-Z. BRADY. YES. BEFORE I START, I KNOW THIS IS ONE THAT SOME OF Y'ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH AS THIS WAS AN ITEM THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY POSTPONED, BUT I KNOW THERE WAS A COUPLE OF Y'ALL THAT WEREN'T HERE FOR THAT.

AND ALSO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT ARE NEW, THAT WEREN'T HERE FOR THAT.

SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND GO THROUGH THE PRESENTATION AS WE DID BEFORE, JUST SO EVERYBODY'S UP TO SPEED ON IT.

WITH THAT THIS IS THE REZONING OF LOT TWO, BLOCK ONE 66, VILLAGE UNIT NUMBER TWO.

THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF AMARILLO. THIS IS IN POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS, PLUS ONE HALF OF ALL BOUNDING STREETS, ALLEYS, AND PUBLIC WAYS. THE CHANGE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR AN ASPHALT OR CONCRETE BATCHING PLANT.

THIS IS IN THE VICINITY OF TRIANGLE DRIVE AND LAKESIDE DRIVE, AND THE APPLICANT IS OJD ENGINEERING LLC FOR RED LINE CATTLE LLC, AND THIS CASE WAS PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED ON MAY 18TH AND WAS POSTPONED AT THAT MEETING DUE TO THE COMMISSION'S REQUEST FOR A THIRD PARTY APPRAISAL TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY VALUES.

AND THEY DID ATTAIN THAT APPRAISAL AND IS THE REASON WE ARE BACK BEFORE YOU ALL TODAY, AS WE BELIEVE THEY MET THE CONDITIONS THAT YOU ALL SET FOR BRINGING IT BACK.

AND THEY ARE ONE THAT DEVELOPED THIS PROPERTY WITH AN ASPHALT BATCHING PLANT. AND THE CITY'S ORDINANCE REQUIRES CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A BATCHING PLANT IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. AND THIS IS A REASON FOR THE REQUEST TODAY. REGARDING ADJACENT ZONING, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY IS THE RED RECTANGLE ON THE MAP.

IT IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ALL AROUND IT. AND ADJACENT LAND USES INCLUDE VACANT PROPERTY AND A TRUCKING COMPANY TO THE NORTH PROPERTY ASSOCIATED WITH ANOTHER ASPHALT BATCHING PLANT TO THE SOUTH, VACANT PROPERTY TO THE EAST AND A MANUFACTURED HOME TO THE WEST AND THE CITY.

PLANNED PLACE TYPE IDENTIFIED FOR THIS PROPERTY IS THE MANUFACTURING AND LOGISTICS CATEGORY.

SO TYPICALLY THAT CATEGORY WOULD RECOMMEND INDUSTRIAL TYPE ZONING AS A POTENTIAL ZONING FOR THAT PLACE TYPE.