[00:00:01]
[1. Call to Order ]
I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS ATTENDING YOUR BUSINESS MEETING HERE TODAY.WE PLAN ON RUNNING AN EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT ONE WITH LOTS OF PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
WE'RE GOING TO OFFICIALLY CALL OURSELVES TO ORDER HERE TODAY.
IF I COULD ASK EVERYONE TO PLEASE RISE,
[2. Invocation]
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE JEREMY MCMORRIS COME FORWARD AND OFFER THE INVOCATION AND THEN REMAIN STANDING FOR THE PLEDGES.>> PLEASE JOIN WITH ME IN PRAYER.
FATHER, YOU ARE GREAT AND YOU'RE GREATLY TO BE PRAISED, AND WE ARE ALL THANKFUL THAT WE LIVE IN A PLACE THAT WANTS TO START ITS MEETING WITH ADDRESSING YOU AND ASKING FOR YOUR BLESSING.
AND SO I DO PRAY THAT YOU WOULD BLESS THIS MEETING, THAT YOU WOULD BLESS THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO SERVED THIS CITY, THAT YOU WOULD BLESS THIS CITY, THAT WE WOULD LIVE OUR LIVES ACCORDING TO YOUR WORD AND YOUR WAYS, AND THAT YOU WOULD CONTINUE TO PROSPEROUS BECAUSE OF OUR INTENTION AND DESIRE TO DO SO.
WE PRAY THESE THINGS IN JESUS NAME, AMEN.
>> PLEASE BE SATED. I ALSO LOVE THAT WE START OUR MEETINGS ADDRESSING, OUR FATHER AND THE KING, AND I LOVE THE FACT THAT WE ACTUALLY KNOW BOTH PLEDGES AND THAT YOU GUYS JOIN IN WITH THAT.
THANK YOU GUYS FOR BEING PATRIOTS AND BEING GREAT CITIZENS AND ALWAYS BEING PLUGGED INTO YOUR COMMUNITY? WE ARE FIVE VOLUNTEERS THAT ARE WORKING REAL HARD FOR YOU UP HERE, SO WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO PUSH GOOD BUSINESS PRACTICES FORWARD.
WE'VE GOT A FEW OF THOSE TO GET THROUGH HERE TODAY.
WE HAVE NOTHING TO PROCLAIM HERE TODAY, OTHER THAN WE'RE THANKFUL TO BE HERE AND LOOKING FORWARD TO A GOOD MEETING.
DO WE HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS, MR. CITY MANAGER? WE'RE GOING TO MOVE INTO ITEM NUMBER 7,
[7. Public Comment ]
WHICH IS PUBLIC COMMENT.I'M GOING TO ASK CITY SECRETARY TO READ US INTO THAT AND THEN HAVE HER HANDLE THE CLOCK.
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING IN TODAY'S CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
YOUR INPUT AND YOUR OPINIONS ARE IMPORTANT TO US, AND WE'RE GLAD YOU'RE HERE TO SHARE THEM.
AT EACH POSTED MEETING, WE INVITE OUR FELLOW COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL REGARDING POSTED AGENDA ITEMS OR TOPICS RELATED TO CITY POLICY.
EVERY SPEAKER TODAY WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL DURING THIS PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION AND DURING ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS.
WE ASK THAT YOU STAY WITHIN YOUR THREE MINUTES ALLOTTED.
WE DO HAVE MULTIPLE PUBLIC HEARINGS TODAY.
IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON A PUBLIC HEARING, WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU SPEAK ON IT EITHER DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING OR DURING PUBLIC COMMENT, BUT NOT BOTH IN ORDER TO HELP US KEEP ACCURATE RECORDS.
IT'S YOUR DECISION AT WHICH POINT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THAT ITEM.
WHEN YOU COME TO THE MICROPHONE TODAY, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND WHETHER OR NOT YOU LIVE WITHIN THE AMARILLO CITY LIMITS.
IF ADDRESSING COUNSEL ON AN AGENDA ITEM, WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU STATE YOUR POSITION, SO IT CAN BE REFLECTED PROPERLY IN OUR MINUTES.
IF YOU'RE SPEAKING ON AN ITEM NOT ON TODAY'S AGENDA, THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT LIMITS HOW OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS MAY RESPOND.
COUNCIL MAY RESPOND WITH A STATEMENT OF FACT.
THEY MAY ASK THAT THE TOPIC BE ADDED TO A FUTURE AGENDA, OR THEY MAY REFER THE MATTER TO THE CITY MANAGER WHO CAN HAVE STAFF STEP OUT AND VISIT WITH YOU REGARDING YOUR TOPIC.
AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY.
OUR FIRST PUBLIC COMMENTER WILL BE ALAN FEINGOLD.
AFTER ALAN WILL BE HOPE MCCOY.
>> HELLO. I AM A CITIZEN OF THE CITY OF AMARILLO.
I LIVE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS.
ABOUT THREE MONTHS AGO, I ADDRESSED THIS COUNCIL CONCERNING THE WAY THAT THE AMARILLO CITY UTILITY DEPARTMENT DETERMINES WATER RATES.
I WANT TO RECAPITULATE THAT, BUT IN ORDER TO DO SO, I THINK I SHOULD USE SOME TERMS WHICH I WILL GIVE YOU AT THE PRESENT TIME.
ONE-INCH METER LINE, THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE PASSAGEWAY THROUGH A METER ONE-INCH IN DIAMETER.
THROUGH THE METER FROM THE CITY OWNED PRESSURIZED WATER MAIN TO THE CUSTOMER OWNED WATER LINE.
[00:05:01]
IF N IS A POSITIVE INTEGER, AN N-INCH METER LINE IS THE SAME PASSAGEWAY, IT SIMPLY HAS A DIAMETER OF N-INCHES.METER FEE. YOU MAY HAVE HEARD THIS TERM MANY TIMES, BUT I HAVE NEVER HEARD IT ACTUALLY DEFINED, ESSENTIALLY, IT'S AN ACCESS FEE THAT IS ACCESS TO THE WATER.
TO CALL IT A METER FEE IS IN POINT OF FACT INACCURATE.
BUT THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO DEBATE.
SINCE I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO ENGAGE IN THAT DEBATE TODAY, I WILL SIMPLY LEAVE IT WITH YOU THAT A METER FEE SHOULD BE CALLED AN ACCESS FEE, AND I WILL USE THOSE TWO WORDS INTERCHANGEABLY.
UNIT PRICE, PRICE PER 1,000 GALLONS.
THAT'S 1,000 GALLONS OF WATER, AND THAT IS THE STANDARD UNIT BY WHICH THE CITY CHARGES ITS CUSTOMERS.
THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF CUSTOMERS, RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL. WATER USE.
THAT DOES NOT ACTUALLY REFER TO THE USE THAT THE CUSTOMER MAKES OF THE WATER.
IT REFERS TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF POTABLE WATER FROM A PRESSURIZED SYSTEM.
THE CITY HAS SEVERAL SUCH PRESSURIZED SYSTEMS. LAST TIME I MENTIONED A RATIO, THAT WHICH WAS PAID BY YOUR LEAST FRUGAL WATER USERS.
HAD A RESIDENCE USING SAY, 100,000 GALLONS OF WATER AND COMPARED THAT TO THE MOST FRUGAL WATER USER OR RESIDENCES OF THE MOST FRUGAL WATER USERS USING ONLY 1,000 GALLONS.
THE RATIO THAT WAS PAID WAS FOUR TIMES.
THAT IS THE MOST FRUGAL WATER USERS PAID FOUR TIMES AS MUCH AS THE LEAST FRUGAL WATER USERS.
I WISH I HAD MORE TIME TO DISCUSS THIS WITH YOU.
NEXT TIME, WE WILL GO INTO THE FEES THAT ARE PAID BY COMMERCIAL WATER USERS AND COMPARE THAT TO THE FRUGAL RESIDENTIAL WATER USER. THANK YOU.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL.
I'M HOPE MCCOY. I LIVE IN PLEASANT VALLEY RIVER ROAD AREA.
I'M HERE TO ASK EACH OF YOU WHAT DO YOU WANT YOUR LEGACY TO BE WHEN YOUR TIME HERE ON THESE SEATS IN.
WHAT DO YOU WANT TO BE REMEMBERED FOR? I BELIEVE YOU ALL ON THIS BOARD CAN FINALLY BE THE DIFFERENCE ALL OF AMARILLO NEEDS, OR I WOULDN'T BE STANDING HERE BEFORE YOU.
I WOULD CONSIDER YOU ALL STILL NEW KIDS ON THE BLOCK THAT ARE STILL LEARNING, BUT YOU'RE EACH HERE WILLING TO LEARN AND TO DO THE JOB OF BEING GOOD STEWARDS OF EACH TAXPAYER'S MONEY.
LOOK, I KNOW YOUR JOBS AREN'T EASY.
I'VE ONLY BEEN COMING HERE SINCE LIKE FEBRUARY AND MARCH, AND I SEE THE DIFFICULT DECISIONS YOU ALL HAVE TO SIGN OFF ON.
I KNOW YOU CAN'T PLEASE EVERY TAX PAYING CITIZEN, BUT THERE MUST BE A BALANCE IN LISTENING TO THE POOR, AS WELL AS THE RICH, AND ESPECIALLY TO THOSE OF US IN BETWEEN.
WITHOUT THAT BALANCE, THERE IT BE WORKER CITIZENS TO DO THE INFRASTRUCTURE WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
SO AS MR. PATH TOLD ME IN THE MEETING, AND AS WELL AS WHAT TOM SHERLIN SAID IN HIS CAMPAIGN SPEECH, THAT THE CITY OF AMARILLO, I BELIEVE, AS A WHOLE, NEEDS TO BE MAINTAINED.
THE CITY CAN'T CONTINUE TO ONLY GO BY NEW SHINY OBJECTS WHEN THE OLD STOPS TO SHINE.
WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY IS THE OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS, ALL OF THEM NORTH OF I40 MATTER TOO, ESPECIALLY NEIGHBORHOODS LIKE PLEASANT VALLEY RIVER ROAD, WHERE TWO MAJOR HIGHWAYS INTERSECT.
BUT YET ALL WE HAVE OUT THERE IS A TOUTIN TOTEM, AND A COUPLE OF GREAT MEXICAN FOOD RESTAURANTS. BUT WHY IS THAT? I HEAR THE TERM LANDLOCKED, WHICH I UNDERSTAND YOU CAN'T BUILD EAST BECAUSE OF HIGHLAND PARK TO THE WEST IS BUSHLAND, AND THE SOUTH SIDE IS FILLING UP.
BUT WHEN I LOOK TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST OF ST. FRANCIS, DUMAS HIGHWAY, AND EVEN ON RIVER ROAD, THERE IS POTENTIAL.
WE EVEN HAVE AN EMPTY SHOPPING CENTER VALLEY PLAZA, THAT NEEDS SOME TLC.
THERE ARE OPEN SPACES OUT THERE.
LESS THAN A MILE OF US, WE HAVE THE VINEYARDS THAT'S STILL GROWING, SAME AS FOX HOLLOW, AND THEN THERE'S STILL US, THE OLD COMMUNITY, PLEASANT VALLEY, AND THEN TO THE FURTHER NORTH RIVER ROAD.
I TRULY BELIEVE WHERE THERE IS A WILL, THERE IS A WAY.
I WANT THE CITY HELP US FIND THAT WAY.
WE THE CITIZENS OF PLEASANT VALLEY RIVER ROAD KNOW WE MUST BE THE FIRST TO TAKE THAT STEP IN REVITALIZATION, AND WE HAVE BY FORMING A BOARD, AND WE'RE HOPING TO BECOME THE NEXT RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD,
[00:10:02]
MAYBE EVEN A TEARS.IN CLOSING, I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY, I HOPE YOU ARE THE BOARD THAT FINALLY MAKES THE DIFFERENCE FOR ALL OF AMARILLO.
WE HAVE TO PLAN FOR THE FUTURE VISITORS THAT ARE COMING THROUGH PORTS OF PLANE AND THE CROSSBAR VISITORS.
WE JUST NEED SOME BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE OUT THERE.
I HOPE YOU'LL PLAN FOR SOMETHING FOR US SOON. THANK YOU. [APPLAUSE] >. MAYOR, THAT CONCLUDES EVERYONE THAT'S SIGNED UP TODAY.
>> THANK YOU, MR. CITY SECRETARY.
DO I HAVE ANYONE ELSE HERE TODAY WHO WOULD LIKE TO OFFER PUBLIC COMMENT, MR. FISHER, IF YOU'D STEP FORWARD.
>> MY NAME IS MIKE FISHER, I LIVE IN THE CITY LIMITS OF AMARILLO.
I WANT TO BEGIN WITH SOMETHING FROM A BROTHER, NOT A CRITIC.
BUT AS A NEIGHBOR, AS A CITIZEN AND SOMEONE WHO VOTED FOR YOU, BECAUSE I BELIEVED IN THE FIRE, YOU HAD TO DO WHAT WAS RIGHT.
I REMEMBER WHEN YOU STOOD UP AGAINST THE FORMER MAYOR OVER THE FLY IN THE UKRAINIAN FLAG, I WAS A LOT OF FUN WATCHING THAT LIKE THAT STUFF WHERE YOU STOOD UP TO THESE GUYS, AND YOU DID IT FOUR ON ONE.
NOW THAT YOU'RE MAYOR, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT RATIO IS NOW, BUT THAT MOMENT STUCK WITH ME.
YOU WEREN'T AFRAID TO SPEAK OUT, YOU WEREN'T AFRAID TO FIGHT.
THAT'S THE COLE STANLEY I VOTED FOR WHEN YOU WERE ON THE COUNCIL, AND THAT'S THE COLE STANLEY I VOTED FOR TWICE AS MAYOR.
FROM A BROTHERS KEEPER, I'M ASKING YOU, WHERE IS THAT COLE STANLEY NOW? BECAUSE WHAT I SEE TODAY DOESN'T FEEL THE SAME MAN.
I SAY THAT NOT WITH ANGER, BUT WITH CONCERN, A BROTHERS KEEPER CONCERN.
WE NEED THAT VOICE BACK BECAUSE WHAT'S HAPPENING AT CITY HALL ISN'T GOVERNANCE.
IT'S A CIRCUS. COLE, I NEED YOUR HELP.
BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, THIS CITY FEELS IT'S RUNNING ON GAMES, AND EVERYONE IN LEADERSHIP IS PLAYING SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
LAURA STORRS, SHE'S PLAYING DODGEBALL WITH PUBLIC INFORMATION.
IT'S BEEN ALMOST TWO MONTHS SINCE I REQUESTED THE CHECK REGISTERED DATA.
SHE SAYS IT'S SIMPLE. BUT THEN SAYS, "CAN'T GIVE YOU ACH INFORMATION, NOR DEPOSITS, NOR WIRE TRANSFERS." THAT'S NOT SIMPLE. THAT'S PLAYING KEEP AWAY.
CITY MANAGER, HE'S PLAYING HIDE AND SEEK.
I ASK FOR THE CHECK REGISTERED DATA RELATED TO ADC, AND HE GIVES ME GENERAL LEDGER DATA.
HE HIDES AND I SEEK CITY ATTORNEY.
HE'S OVER HERE IN CANDY CRUSH.
THEY ALL, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM, LOOK AROUND. PLAYING PEEKABOO.
WHEN I SPEAK ABOUT SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS, THEY LOOK AWAY, AVOIDING EYE CONTACT.
MEANWHILE, I'M STUCK PLAYING WHO WANTS TO GO TO PRISON NEXT.
BECAUSE LET'S NOT FORGET TWO FORMER CITY EMPLOYEES ARE SITTING IN JAIL FOR STEALING HUD MONEY.
WITH THE WAY THIS CITY IS HIDING INFORMATION, STONEWALLING RECORDS AND DODGING ACCOUNTABILITY, I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF WE'RE NOT DONE YET.
COLE, I DIDN'T COME HERE TO GRANDSTAND.
I CAME HERE BECAUSE I STILL BELIEVE YOU CARE, BECAUSE I KNOW YOU FOUGHT BEFORE, AND I BELIEVE YOU STILL CAN, SO I'M ASKING AS FROM ONE MILL TO ANOTHER.
BE COLE SPEAK UP, HELP STOP THE GAMES.
BRING BACK THE COLE WE ALL BELIEVED IN.
>> THANK YOU, MR. FISHER. [APPLAUSE] APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERN AND YOUR COMMENTS.
DO YOU HAVE ANYONE ELSE HERE TODAY WHO'D LIKE TO OFFER PUBLIC COMMENT? SEEING NO ONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT, MOVE FORWARD WITH THE REST OF OUR BUSINESS MEETING.
ITEM NUMBER 8 IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA.
[8. Consent Items]
DO I HAVE ANYTHING THAT NEEDS TO COME OFF ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? COUNCILMAN SIMPSON, I'LL SEE YOUR MIC ON.>> MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO BRING 8E OFF JUST FOR A LITTLE EDUCATION AND INFORMATION SEPARATELY FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
CAN YOU REPEAT THAT AGAIN? ITEM 8E.
CONSIDER THE INVESTMENT POLICY.
>> YES, SIR. ANYTHING ELSE YOU NEED TO COME OFF, GENTLEMEN.
WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON CONSENT AGENDA?
[00:15:01]
>> SO MOVED. I HAVE A SECOND THAT AUTHORIZES THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 8.E.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
[8.E. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 07-22-25-2 This item considers a resolution adopting the City of Amarillo 2025 Investment Policy, including changes to the Amarillo Economic Development section of the policy to align with the overall City investment policy. Amarillo City Council is responsible for approving the investment policy annually, in accordance with Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code, the Public Funds Investment Act.]
LET'S SEE WHO WE WANT TO HAND THAT TO, MR. PATH. MRS. STORRS IS COMING UP.MRS. STORRS, IF YOU'LL RUN WITH THAT ONE.
>> YES. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
ITEM 8.E IS A RESOLUTION UPDATING THE CITY OF AMARILLO INVESTMENT POLICY.
THE CITY OF AMARILLO HAS PUBLIC FUNDS, AND SO THEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC FUNDS INVESTMENT ACT, WHICH IS ALL OUTLINED IN STATE LAW.
ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS IS THAT IT HAS TO BE REVIEWED ANNUALLY.
THE GOOD NEWS IS WE DON'T HAVE ANY CHANGES RELATED TO THE CITY'S PORTION OF THE POLICY THIS YEAR, BUT WE HAVE BEEN IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE AEDC BOARD.
AT THIS PAST COUNCIL MEETING, AEDC VOTED TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL CHANGE ONE PARAGRAPH IN THE CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY RELATED TO THE AEDC INVESTMENT OF THEIR FUNDS.
PREVIOUSLY, AEDC HAD A RESTRICTION THAT INVESTMENTS SHOULD BE NO MORE THAN 190 DAYS TO MATURITY.
THAT'S HISTORICALLY HOW WE HAD INVESTED THEIR FUNDS.
ON THE CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY, IT'S A LITTLE MORE BROAD THAN THAT.
WHAT AEDC HAS ASKED IS IF THEY COULD ALIGN THEIR INVESTMENTS SIMILAR TO HOW THE CITY DOES THEIR.
LET ME GIVE YOU JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS OUTLINED IN THE CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY THAT WOULD CHANGE BASED ON THIS REQUEST FROM THE AEDC BOARD.
ONE OF THE BIG FACTORS IS THE INVESTMENTS IN AGENCIES AND INSTRUMENTALITIES IS LIMITED TO 75% OF THE PORTFOLIO.
THAT CERTAINLY WILL NOT BE AN ISSUE WITH THEM.
THEY CANNOT INVEST MORE THAN 25% OF THE PORTFOLIO IN CALLABLE SECURITIES, AND WE HAVEN'T DONE AS MANY CALLABLE SECURITIES IN THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS, SO THAT CERTAINLY WILL NOT BE AN ISSUE FOR THEM.
THE COMBINED CASH EQUIVALENT INVESTMENT SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 15% OF THE OVERALL PORTFOLIO.
WE HAVE KEPT MUCH MORE THAN THAT IN AEDC HISTORICALLY BECAUSE THEIR BALANCES HAVE ACTUALLY GROWN AS SALES TAX HAS GROWN QUITE A BIT SINCE COVID, AND HISTORICALLY, AEDC WANTED TO HAVE A LOT MORE LIQUIDITY IN CASE A PROJECT CAME UP.
WE PRETTY MUCH JUST INVESTED IN MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS, WHICH HAVE OVERNIGHT AVAILABILITY, AND IN CDS OR CDS, AND THOSE USUALLY STRETCH NO MORE THAN A 52-WEEK PERIOD.
THIS WOULD ACTUALLY ALLOW THEM TO GO OUT.
THE FINAL PIECE ON THE CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY THAT WOULD PERTAIN TO THEM THAT'S REALLY A CHANGE FOR THEM IS ALL INVESTMENTS PURCHASED WILL HAVE A MATURITY DATE THAT DOES NOT EXCEED FIVE YEARS.
WE WOULD NOT BE BUYING ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF A FIVE-YEAR MATURITY.
AT ALL TIMES, AT LEAST 80% OF THE PORTFOLIO, SO IN THIS CASE, 80% OF AEDC'S PORTFOLIO, WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE INVESTED WITH MATURITIES OF TWO YEARS OR LESS.
IT WOULD STILL KEEP THEM VERY LIQUID.
NO MORE THAN 20% OF THE PORTFOLIO CAN BE HELD IN MATURITIES RANGING FROM 2-5 YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM DOLLAR WEIGHTED AVERAGE MATURITY OF THE PORTFOLIO, SO OF AEDC'S PORTFOLIO, IN THIS CASE, WOULD NOT EXCEED ONE YEAR.
IT'S JUST ALLOWING THEM TO GO OUT.
ACTUALLY, SINCE COVID, SINCE, INTEREST RATES HAVE CHANGED AND ACTUALLY THEY WENT UP QUITE A BIT, THE YIELD CURVE HAS BEEN INVERTED, WHICH MEANS THAT SHORT-TERM SECURITIES, SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS WERE GETTING A HIGHER YIELD THAN FURTHER OUT INVESTMENTS, AND THAT'S NORMALLY NOT HOW IT WORKS.
WHAT THEY ARE ASKING IS THEY WANT TO GO AHEAD AND ALLOW THE ABILITY FOR THE CITY TO INVEST THEIR FUNDS OUT A LITTLE BIT FURTHER THAN 190-DAY PERIOD, SO AS THAT YIELD CURVE AT SOME POINT STARTS NORMALIZING, WHERE LONGER TERM INVESTMENTS GET A HIGHER YIELD THAN THE SHORTER TERM, THAT WE CAN GO AHEAD AND LOCK THEM IN TO GET SOME OF THOSE INTEREST RATES.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS FROM THE CITY'S STANDPOINT ON THIS.
WE WOULD ESSENTIALLY KEEP THEIR PORTFOLIO ALMOST IN A SEPARATE LADDER THAN THE CITY'S INVESTMENTS, AND WE WOULD TRY TO LADDER THEIR INVESTMENTS OUT OVER THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD, WITH THE BULK OF THE INVESTMENTS BEING TWO YEARS OR LESS.
THAT WAS VOTED ON BY THE BOARD AT THEIR LAST MEETING, I BELIEVE, WAS ON THE 15TH, AND THEY ARE ASKING BECAUSE COUNCIL APPROVES THE CITY'S POLICY, AND THIS IS A PART OF IT, JUST TO ALIGN
[00:20:02]
THEIR PORTION OF IT WITH WHAT THE CITY'S PARAMETERS ARE.CAN I ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT?
>> HISTORICALLY, THE INVESTMENTS FOR THE AEDC HAVE BEEN MORE SHORTER TERM?
>> WELL, AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO NECESSARILY SPEAK FOR AEDC, BUT I THINK THIS GOES BACK QUITE A WAYS, AND I DON'T KNOW THAT THEY HAD THE SAME AMOUNT OF CASH FLOW THAT THEY HAVE OVER MAYBE THE LAST 5-10.
THEY NEEDED TO KEEP EVERYTHING MUCH MORE SHORT-TERM IN CASE A PROJECT CAME UP AND THEY NEEDED TO DO SOME AN INCENTIVE OR SOME A CASH UPFRONT AMOUNT.
THAT WAY, THEY DIDN'T HAVE THINGS TIED UP IN LONGER TERM INVESTMENTS WHERE THEY WERE LOOKING TO EITHER SELL THEM AND HAVE TO REALIZE SOME A LOSS.
I THINK PART OF IT HAS JUST BEEN HOW MUCH AEDC HAS GROWN EVEN OVER THE LAST 5-10 YEARS.
THE CITY HAS AS WELL FROM A SALES TAX STANDPOINT.
>> THIS IS JUST GIVING THEM THE FLEXIBILITY TO INVEST IT AT DIFFERENT TIME LEVELS TO EARN MORE OFF OF THAT MONEY IF IT'S NOT BEING USED, BUT COMING UP WITH A FORMULA THAT STILL ALLOWS ENOUGH LIQUIDITY TO DO THE PROJECTS OR HAVE ENOUGH AVAILABLE?
>> THAT'S CORRECT. JUST AS A QUICK REMINDER, ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF THE CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY, AND THIS APPLIES TO ALL PUBLIC FUNDS, THERE'S THREE OBJECTIVES.
THE FIRST OBJECTIVE IS TO PRESERVE CAPITAL.
WE DON'T WANT TO BE LOSING MONEY.
WE DON'T WANT TO BE RECOGNIZING ANY LOSSES.
THEN THE SECOND ONE IS TO MAKE SURE WE'RE LIQUID, TO PROVIDE LIQUIDITY THAT IS SO IMPORTANT BECAUSE WE HAVE TO HAVE AVAILABILITY TO ACCESS CASH WHEN NEEDED.
THEN THE THIRD ONE IS ACTUALLY TO OPTIMIZE EARNING.
IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN MAYBE A FOR-PROFIT ENTITY MIGHT BE.
THIS IS ALL REQUIRED BY STATE LAW.
I THINK, AEDC WITH THEIR RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL, WOULD STILL MEET THIS CRITERIA.
WE WOULD WORK VERY CAREFULLY WITH THE AEDC TEAM TO LOOK AT THEIR UPCOMING OBLIGATIONS OVER THE NEXT 2-5 YEARS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE PROPER CASH FLOW COMING IN.
AGAIN, THEY HAVE BEEN INVESTED IN VERY SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS UP TO THIS POINT, WHICH HAVE DONE VERY WELL OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS, BUT WE DO ANTICIPATE THAT'LL CHANGE AT SOME POINT, BUT WE'LL WORK CLOSELY WITH THEM.
>> GENERALLY, IF YOU TAKE THE MONEY OUT BEFORE THE TWO OR FIVE-YEAR PERIOD, WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT?
>> IT DEPENDS BECAUSE YOU COULD POTENTIALLY RECOGNIZE A LOSS AND NOT GET YOUR FULL AMOUNT THAT YOU HAD INVESTED IN BACK, DEPENDING ON WHAT SECURITY THAT YOU WERE LOOKING AT OR WHAT TYPE OF INVESTMENT.
BUT THE CITY'S POLICY, WHICH WOULD ALSO APPLY TO AEDC IS THAT WE HOLD EVERYTHING TO FULL MATURITY BECAUSE WE DON'T EVER WANT TO COMPROMISE ANY TAXPAYER DOLLARS BY RECOGNIZING SOME LOSS BY LIQUIDATING AN INVESTMENT TOO EARLY.
>> IF WE HAD SOME MAJOR PROJECT THAT CAME ALONG, I GUESS, IS THE POTENTIAL TO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY AVAILABLE, OR IS IT THAT GENERALLY THOSE INCENTIVES ARE PAID OFF FOR A LONGER TERM, SO IT COULD BE TWO AND FIVE YEARS OUT?
I THINK MOST OF THEIR INCENTIVES ARE STRUCTURED OUT OVER MAYBE A 5-10-YEAR PERIOD, WHICH WOULD ALLOW US THAT ABILITY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE PLANNING INVESTMENTS APPROPRIATELY, THE OTHER THING THAT WE HAVE, BECAUSE THEY ARE PART OF THE CITY'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OVERALL, IF WE EVER GOT INTO A BIND, WE COULD LOOK AT IF THE CITY HAD THE ABILITY TO TAKE OVER ONE OF THEIR LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS WITHOUT US TRULY HAVING TO GO OUT AND LIQUIDATE THAT INVESTMENT AND RECOGNIZE SOME LOSS.
WE WOULD WORK CLOSELY WITH THEM ON THAT.
AGAIN, NO MORE THAN 20% OF THE PORTFOLIO COULD BE IN THAT 3-5 RANGE PERIOD.
THAT IS DEFINITELY A SMALLER AMOUNT, ESPECIALLY FOR AEDC, BUT WE WOULD WATCH IT VERY CLOSELY, AND WE WOULD SHRINK THAT 20% IF WE SAW THAT THEY WERE GOING TO NEED CASH FLOW IN THOSE UPCOMING YEARS.
ALL OF HOW WE CAN INVEST OUR MONEY, WHETHER IT'S AEDC OR CITY, ALL THOSE GUIDELINES ARE PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF TEXAS ON HOW WE CAN DO THAT, SO WE HAVE TO FOLLOW UNDER THEIR GUIDELINE.
ESSENTIALLY, I ALWAYS TELL PEOPLE, WE CAN ONLY INVEST IN VERY PLAIN VANILLA INVESTMENTS.
WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO PUT OUR MONEY IN THE STOCK MARKET OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
THEY HAVE TO BE VERY SAFE SECURE INVESTMENTS.
>> I THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA, AND I'M GLAD THEY MADE THE RECOMMENDATION BECAUSE I DO THINK USING THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY TO ITS MAXIMUM AMOUNT INSTEAD OF JUST A 190 DAYS, IT GIVES A BENEFIT TO BE ABLE TO LEVERAGE THAT WHILE IT'S SITTING THERE UNTIL WE HAVE OUR PROJECT USE.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COUNCIL?
[00:25:02]
>> WHO MANAGES THAT PORTFOLIO, MRS. STORRS?
>> THAT WOULD BE OUR FINANCE DEPARTMENT ALONG WITH, WE HAVE A THIRD PARTY CONSULTANT GROUP, VALLEY VIEW CONSULTING, AND THEY MONITOR IT AS WELL. YES.
>> IS THAT ANNUALIZED? IS IT QUARTERLY? WHEN DOES THAT PORTFOLIO GO OUT? DOES THE EDC RECEIVE IT?
>> YES. ALSO, ACCORDING TO STATE LAW, WE HAVE TO PROVIDE QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORTS, AND SO WE PROVIDE THOSE TO AEDC AS WELL.
WE CERTAINLY, IF THEY HAVE QUESTIONS ON A MONTHLY BASIS BECAUSE IT'S ALL BEING MONITORED ON A MONTHLY BASIS, BUT WE DO THE FORMALIZED REPORTING ON A QUARTERLY BASIS.
>> YOU SAID THAT'S VALLEY VIEW CONSULTING?
>> ARE THEY THE ONES THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE TO PRODUCE THAT PORTFOLIO?
>> THEY WORK IN COORDINATION WITH OUR FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO DO THAT. YES.
>> ARE THEY THE ONES THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE TO GIVE IT TO THE EDC BOARD MEMBERS?
>> IT'S THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY?
>> JUST THE CITY'S RESPONSIBLE.
>> BECAUSE THEY WORK FOR US. VALLEY VIEW WORKS FOR US.
>> I HAVE A QUESTION. WHAT'S THE RATE RETURN? WHAT HAVE WE SEEN ON A THREE-YEAR?
>> YES. IT'S BEEN FLUCTUATING.
AGAIN, WE'VE HAD MOST INVESTMENTS, ESPECIALLY EVEN WITH AEDC IN SHORTER TERM CDS AND MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS.
OVER THE LAST YEAR, WE HAVE SEEN ANYWHERE FROM 4-4.5% RETURN ON IT.
ACTUALLY, IF WE HAD GONE OUT TO THE 3-5-YEAR PERIOD, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN LOWER.
I THINK, AND I DON'T WANT TO THROW A NUMBER OUT THERE, BUT I DO KNOW FOR SURE RIGHT NOW THOSE NUMBERS ARE LOWER AT THIS POINT.
BUT AT SOME POINT THAT YIELD CURVE WILL NORMALIZE AND THOSE LONGER TERM INVESTMENTS WILL BE WORTH MORE.
THEY'LL HAVE THE HIGHER YIELD THAN WHAT THE SHORT-TERM DOES.
WE'RE TRYING TO GET PREPARED FOR THAT SO WE CAN START MAKING SURE WE OPTIMIZE THEIR EARNINGS?
>> IN THE SPIRIT OF THINGS THAT WE'VE BEEN DOING WITH THE CHECK REGISTRY AND A FEW OTHER THINGS TO ADDRESS LIKE MAYBE MR. FISHER'S POINT ON CHECK REGISTRY AND TRANSPARENCY, IS THERE ANY REASON WHY THAT PORTFOLIO WOULDN'T BE MAYBE PUT UP AT PUBLIC VIEW? I KNOW YOU'RE GIVING IT OUT QUARTERLY.
IS THAT SOMETHING WE CAN PUT ON THE DASHBOARD AS WELL, OR WHAT WOULD BE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT?
>> WE CERTAINLY COULD LOOK INTO ADDING THE CITY'S QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT OUT ON OUR FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY WEBSITE IF THAT'S SOMETHING COUNCIL WANTED.
WE WOULD NOT RECOMMEND PUTTING AEDC'S OUT THERE.
IF THEY WANTED TO SHARE IT, THEY CERTAINLY COULD, BUT IT'S ALWAYS AVAILABLE THROUGH AN OPEN RECORDS REQUEST IF SOMEONE WANTS TO ACCESS IT THAT WAY.
>> GOOD DISCUSSION. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE?
WE'D ASK FOR A MOTION ON ITEM 8.E?
>> I MOVE TO ADOPT ITEM 8.E AS PRESENTED.
WE WILL MOVE RIGHT ALONG TO SECTION 9 ARE DISCUSSION ITEMS.
[9.A. Review agenda items for regular meeting and attachments]
ITEM 9.A. COUNCIL, DO I HAVE ANYTHING UP FOR REVIEW ON THIS AGENDA? ANYBODY GOT QUESTIONS?[9.B. Recap of 2025 "Independence Day +1" event ]
A RECAP OF 2025 INDEPENDENCE DAY PLUS ONE.AS MR. KASHUBA MAKES HIS WAY UP HERE, I WOULD POINT YOUR ATTENTION TO SEVERAL MILLION DOLLARS THAT ARE BEING PUT INTO YOUR COMMUNITY THROUGH PARKS AND REC IN A GREAT MASTER PLAN THAT'S COVERING PARK LIGHTING, SOME MUSCO LIGHTING THAT'S GOING OUT.
THERE'LL BE AN ADDITIONAL PATHWAY INTO JOHN STIFF PARK, SOME ADDITIONAL PARKING LOTS, ALL GOOD THINGS THAT YOU'RE SEEING.
I THINK THAT WE VISIBLY GET TO WITNESS SOME OF THE BIGGEST IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'VE SEEN OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS WHEN IT COMES TO YOUR DEPARTMENT.
MAN, WE'RE THANKFUL THAT YOU'RE OUT THERE PUSHING THAT MONEY IN GOOD PLACES, AND SO TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT MAYBE OUR SECOND YEAR HERE TO CELEBRATE INDEPENDENCE DAY.
>> MAYOR AND COUNCIL, MICHAEL KASHUBA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION.
FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO JUST APPRECIATE COUNCIL SUPPORT.
IT TAKES A LOT OF EFFORT FROM STAFF, NOT JUST OUR DEPARTMENT, BUT FROM ACROSS CITY DEPARTMENTS.
WE GET TO RECAP THAT A LITTLE BIT TODAY.
FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO RECOGNIZE BECKY DREYER.
SHE LIKES TO SIT IN THE BACK AND DOESN'T LIKE A LOT OF ATTENTION, BUT SHE'S THE BRAINS BEHIND THIS EVENT AND REALLY LEADING THE CHARGE WITH A LOT OF OUR PROGRAMS THAT WE'RE DOING IN THE PARK.
I JUST WANTED TO START BRIEFLY BY TOUCHING ON SOME OF OUR SPONSORS.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE PARTNER WITH OUTDOOR AMARILLO, AND EACH YEAR, WE'VE SEEN THIS NUMBER INCREASE.
IT'S ACTUALLY MORE THAN DOUBLED SINCE LAST YEAR.
SOME OF OUR SPONSORS, OBVIOUSLY, AUSTIN HOSE WAS THE MAIN SPONSOR FOR THE DRONE SHOW.
BUDWEISER, AMARILLO NATIONAL, PAK-A-SAK,
[00:30:01]
PARKHILL, XCEL ENERGY, ALPHA MEDIA, AMERICAN LAND AND TITLE, DON TIPPS STATE FARM, AND SKP CREATIVE.WE'VE ACTUALLY SEEN THOSE SPONSORSHIPS GROW.
I THINK LAST YEAR IT WAS IN THE $26,000 RANGE, AND SO THAT NUMBER HAS MORE THAN DOUBLED.
AGAIN, WE'RE WORKING WITH OUTDOOR AMARILLO AND WE WOULD ENCOURAGE THEM TO SEE THAT NUMBER CONTINUE TO GROW AS DOES THE EVENT.
THIS YEAR, WE WERE ABLE TO DO THREE CONCERTS.
WE ACTUALLY STARTED WITH TWO OPENING ACTS.
CAMERON JAMES SMITH WAS THE FIRST ONE, FOLLOWED BY PINATA PROTEST OUT OF SAN ANTONIO, AND THEN FOLLOWED BY OUR HEADLINER, COODER GRAW.
I THINK IT WAS A GREAT MIX OF DIFFERENT MUSIC.
I THINK IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE LOOK FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR AS WELL. FOOD TRUCKS.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE ASKED STAFF TO GO AND GET BACK IN TOUCH WITH FOOD TRUCKS JUST TO GET SOME FEEDBACK.
I KNOW LAST YEAR WHEN WE DID THE EVENT, WE HAD 10 FOOD TRUCKS, AND THE LINES WERE EXTREMELY LONG.
THIS YEAR, WE WENT 10-26, AND WE HAD A REALLY POSITIVE RESPONSE FROM OUR FOOD TRUCKS.
TWENTY-SIX FOOD TRUCKS, THEY AVERAGED ABOUT 4,000, SO THAT'S OVER $100,000 IN SALES JUST FOR THE FOOD TRUCKS.
SOME OF THESE COMMENTS ACTUALLY CAME FROM SOME OF THE FOOD TRUCKS.
ONE OF THEM SAID WE SOLD OVER 700 DRINKS IN ONE NIGHT, RECORD DAY.
ONE OF THE FOOD TRUCKS SOLD OVER 14 BRISKETS AND 400 POUNDS OF ICE.
ANOTHER ONE SAID, THIS IS BY FAR OUR BIGGEST DAY.
WE CONTINUE TO SEE THOSE PARTNERS DO WELL AS DOES THE EVENT.
AGAIN, WE TALK ABOUT PARTNERSHIPS.
WE CAN'T DO THIS ALONE. THIS IS A LARGE UNDERTAKING.
I MENTIONED OUTDOOR AMARILLO AND THEIR ROLE IN THE SPONSORSHIP AND VIP AREAS.
ALPHA MEDIA DID AN AMAZING JOB OF HELPING PROMOTE THE EVENT.
THEN WE HAD AMARILLO KINGS CORNHOLE THAT DID THE CORNHOLE TOURNAMENT.
AGAIN, I TOUCHED ON OUR DEPARTMENT AND HOW WE HAD ALMOST EVERY DIVISION IN OUR DEPARTMENT PARTICIPATE, BUT I THINK IT'S JUST AS IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE ALL THE OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS THAT PLAYED A ROLE IN THIS.
EVERYBODY, FROM EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT, FIRE MARSHAL, POLICE DEPARTMENT, TRANSIT, TRAFFIC, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, SOLID WASTE, ANIMAL MANAGEMENT, FLEET, AND ALSO, THE LIBRARY.
THAT'S A LOT OF CITY DEPARTMENTS, ALL PLAYING A KEY ROLE IN THIS EVENT, WHETHER IT'S MANAGING TRAFFIC, WHETHER IT'S CROWD CONTROL, WHETHER IT'S PARTICIPATING IN OUR KIDS ZONE.
THE VENDORS WE USED THIS YEAR WERE FIREWORKS BY WESTERN, SKY ELEMENTS, EXPRESS, RANDALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, WEST TEXAS GOLF CARTS, WRANGLER PUMPING, EQUIPMENTSHARE, AND MACGREGOR ENTERTAINMENT.
THEN WE ALSO HAD SOME VOLUNTEERS THAT VOLUNTEERED THEIR TIME TO HELP.
THAT WAS THE CERT, AMAZING GRACE CHURCH, CAMILLE SUZANNE, WHO DID THE NATIONAL ANTHEM, AND DON JOHNSON, WHO DID THE FLYOVER.
>> THIS YEAR, WE ACTUALLY EXPANDED OUR KIDS ZONE.
WE MOVED IT FROM SOUTH OF THE STAGE OVER TO THOSE ATHLETIC FIELDS.
GREAT RESPONSE, AND A LOT OF REALLY POSITIVE FEEDBACK.
WE'VE ALREADY HEARD PEOPLE SAY THEY'RE COMING BACK NEXT YEAR AND BRINGING AS MANY FRIENDS AS THEY CAN.
THIS JUST GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES THAT WE'RE IN THERE.
EVERYTHING FROM INFLATABLES TO SPIN ART, THE ZOO IS THERE.
WE HAD SOME VEHICLES THAT PEOPLE COULD SPRAY PAINT WITH SILLY STRING.
WE HAD A REALLY POSITIVE RESPONSE IN THE KIDS ZONE, AND THAT'S AN AREA THAT I THINK WE CONTINUE TO GROW MOVING FORWARD. THE CORNHOLE TOURNAMENT.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WAS A FIRST TIME EVENT.
THE AMARILLO KINGS CORNHOLE GROUP FACILITATED THAT ON OUR BEHALF.
WE HAD 32 TEAMS THAT PARTICIPATED THIS YEAR.
THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO GROW MOVING FORWARD.
MARKETING. JUST A QUICK SNAPSHOT OF SOME OF THE EFFORTS WE DID TO TRY TO MARKET THE EVENT.
I BRICK & ELM, WE HAD A QUARTER PAGE AD.
WE DID SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS ON JUNE 4TH, THE 23RD, THE 30TH, JULY 2ND, AND 5TH.
WE ALWAYS GO ON SECOND CUP AND MEDIA LUNCH & LEARN, STUDIO 4.
THOSE ARE NOT JUST FOR THIS EVENT, BUT WE DO THAT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR TO PROMOTE PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES THAT WE HAVE GOING ON AS A DEPARTMENT.
THEN BECAUSE OF OUR PARTNERSHIP WITH ALPHA MEDIA, THEY RAN A LOT OF RADIO SPOTS FOR US.
YOU CAN SEE ON 710 AND 97.5, THEY RAN 45 SPOTS, KGNC 979 RAN 48, 102.9 RAN 45, AND THE EAGLE AIRED 44 SPOT.
AGAIN, A LOT OF GREAT PUBLICITY.
WE ALSO PUT OUT SOME BILLBOARDS, SOME BANNERS, SOME YARD SIGNS, ANYTHING WE COULD DO TO TRY TO PROMOTE THE EVENT.
IN TERMS OF SPONSORSHIP, THERE WAS THE NINE SPONSORS I PREVIOUSLY TOUCHED ON FOR ABOUT 59,000.
ALPHA MEDIA STATED THAT THEY HAD ABOUT 6,000 PEOPLE LISTENING DURING THE EVENT. LET ME GO BACK.
TRANSIT HAD OVER 1,100 PASSENGER TRIPS ON THE SHUTTLES.
AGAIN, THAT WAS RUNNING THE SHUTTLE FROM AMARILLO HIGH AND ALSO RANDALL.
I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT CONTINUES TO GET BETTER.
WE'VE HAD REALLY GOOD FEEDBACK ON THOSE SPECIFIC ROUTES AND JUST THE OVERALL EXPERIENCE.
[00:35:02]
AGAIN, AS WE MOVE FORWARD, WE ENCOURAGE MORE AND MORE PEOPLE TO TAKE THOSE SHUTTLES FROM THOSE LOCATIONS.YOU GOT THE RESULTS FROM THE BEER GARDEN.
OUTDOOR AMARILLO SOLD SOME OF THEIR MERCHANDISE.
THEN ON SOCIAL MEDIA, YOU CAN SEE THE JUNE 30TH POST HAD ALMOST 72,000 VIEWS, JULY 5TH, 41,000, AND THEN OVER THAT TIME AS A DEPARTMENT, WE GAINED 576 FOLLOWERS.
JUST SOME IDEAS FOR NEXT YEAR.
NEXT YEAR IS THE 250TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.
I KNOW THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE AN INCREASED FOCUS ON THOSE CELEBRATIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
ONE OF THE THINGS WE DID THIS YEAR WAS A CARNIVAL AREA, AND I THINK WHAT WE WOULD LOOK AT DOING IS ADDING A LARGER ADULT FERRIS WHEEL WHERE PEOPLE CAN GO RIDE THAT FERRIS WHEEL.
AGAIN, WE TALKED ABOUT ADDING AND EXPANDING THAT KIDS ZONE.
IT WAS VERY WELL ATTENDED, AND OUR GOAL WOULD BE TO ADD SOME MORE COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN THERE, MORE ACTIVITIES.
ONE OF THE THINGS IS ALWAYS TRYING TO GET PEOPLE IN AND OUT OF THAT SPACE FROM AN ADA STANDPOINT, SO LOOKING AT WAYS WE CAN IMPROVE THAT ADA TRANSPORTATION.
AGAIN, WE'VE GOT THE TWO NEW PARKING LOT, THAT'LL HELP IN TERMS OF CAPACITY, AND THEN THE CONNECTOR ROAD THAT WOULD COME FROM THE SKATE PARK UP TO BELL.
WE THINK THAT'LL HELP WITH A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS, NOT ONLY FROM CIRCULATION.
IT ALSO GIVES US SOME ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR RUNNING TRANSIT ROUTES THROUGH THE PARK WHILE STILL KEEPING THAT PARK CLOSED.
WE THINK THAT WILL HELP WITH A LOT OF DIFFERENT ELEMENTS IN THAT PARK.
POSSIBLY ADDING A CAR SHOW, A BIKE PARADE, AND I THINK ALSO LOOKING AT EXPANDING SOME ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES.
OBVIOUSLY, WE'VE GOT THE TENNIS CENTER THERE.
YOU'VE GOT THE SOFTBALL COMPLEX THERE, YOU'VE GOT THE ATHLETIC FIELDS ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE.
JUST LOOKING AT WAYS WE CAN SLOWLY EXPAND THAT.
AGAIN, WE WANT TO DO IT SUSTAINABLY WHERE WE'RE NOT GROWING SO FAST, BUT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S A QUALITY EVENT, SO SLOWLY ADDING MORE AND MORE ACTIVITIES EACH YEAR.
A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT WE'RE LOOKING TO COUNCIL FOR A LITTLE BIT OF GUIDANCE ON IS, WHAT DO WE DO NEXT YEAR? I KNOW WE'VE BEEN INDEPENDENCE DAY PLUS ONE, SO WE'VE BEEN FOCUSED ON THE FIFTH.
OBVIOUSLY, NEXT YEAR IS THE 250TH ANNIVERSARY, DO WE STAY ON THE FIFTH? DO WE LOOK AT OTHER DATES? HERE'S A CHART THAT WE PUT TOGETHER THAT HIGHLIGHTS SOME OF THE PROS AND CONS FOR ALL OF THE DIFFERENT DATES.
SOME OF THE FEEDBACK WE'VE HEARD WITH BEING ON THE INDEPENDENCE DAY PLUS ONE IS YOU'RE NOT DOING IT ON THE FOURTH, IT NEEDS TO BE ON THE FOURTH.
I THINK THE SAME ARGUMENT COULD BE SAID FOR THE THIRD.
OBVIOUSLY, THE THIRD AND THE FIFTH ARE BENEFICIAL FOR A COUPLE OF THINGS.
NUMBER 1, YOU DON'T HAVE TO PAY OVERTIME FOR STAFF, WHICH IS A SIGNIFICANT COST.
IT'S ALSO A LOT EASIER TO TRY TO FIND VENDORS AND ALSO FIREWORK SHOWS, THINGS LIKE THAT.
A LOT OF THOSE OBVIOUSLY ARE ON THE FOURTH, AND SO IF WE DO IT ON THE THIRD OF THE FIFTH, THEN IT GIVES US AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAYBE GET SOME ADDITIONAL DRONES OR FIREWORKS.
AGAIN, IF YOU LOOK AT THE THIRD, NO OVERTIME, LESS STRAIN ON FIRST RESPONDERS.
THEN THE THIRD, GENERALLY, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THE DAY OFF ON THE FOURTH, SO FOR PEOPLE ENJOYING IT, THE CHALLENGE IS THEN YOU CAN'T REALLY DO EVENTS DURING THE DAY BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE AT WORK.
ON THE FOURTH, OBVIOUSLY, I THINK YOU COULD DO A FULL DAY OF ACTIVITIES.
THAT'S WHERE WE TALKED ABOUT EXPANDING THAT PROGRAM AND EXPANDING THAT EVENT.
CITIZENS GENERALLY WOULD EXPECT AN EVENT ON THE FOURTH.
THE CONTRAST IS IT'S GOING TO BE A HIGHER DEMAND FOR SHOWS, WHETHER IT'S THE DRONES OR FIREWORKS, AND SO WE MAY END UP PAYING A LITTLE BIT HIGHER COST FOR THOSE.
OBVIOUSLY, CANYON IS HOSTING THEIRS ON INDEPENDENCE DAY, AND WE WOULD ALSO BE COMPETING FOR SOME OF THOSE FOOD VENDORS.
THERE WOULD BE THE OVERTIME FOR STAFF, AND THEN DEPENDING ON ACTIVITY IN THE COMMUNITY, FIRST RESPONDERS MAY BE PULLED TO GO ADDRESS OTHER ISSUES THROUGHOUT TOWN.
ONE OF THE THINGS WE DO THINK AND WE HIGHLIGHTED AT THE BOTTOM, IS IT IS IMPORTANT TO IDENTIFY A CONSISTENT DATE SO PEOPLE KNOW HOW TO PLAN FOR IT.
I THINK INDEPENDENCE DAY PLUS ONE HAS BEEN GREAT.
I THINK AS WE MOVE FORWARD, IF IT SHIFTS TO THE MIDDLE OF THE WEEK, IT MAY BE MORE OF A CHALLENGE.
ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS IS IF WE PICK A DEFINITIVE DATE MOVING FORWARD, THEN IT ALSO ALLOWS US TO LOOK AT LONGER TERM DEALS, WHICH I THINK WOULD ULTIMATELY SAVE US MONEY AND COST IN THE LONG RUN.
JUST SOME THINGS TO THINK ABOUT.
I DON'T KNOW THAT WE NEED FEEDBACK RIGHT NOW, BUT AS WE MOVE FORWARD, THOSE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING FOR SOME DIRECTION ON.
>> QUESTIONS ON THIS, COUNCIL, OR MAYBE SOME DIRECTION MOVING FORWARD?
>> HEY, MICHAEL, DO YOU HAVE ANY ESTIMATE ON NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT ATTENDED? [LAUGHTER]
>> THAT'S ALWAYS THE QUESTION.
THESE ARE SOME AERIALS THAT WE ACTUALLY HAD APD PULL FROM THEIR DRONES.
YOU CAN SEE IT'S A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PEOPLE AND VEHICLES.
THE CHALLENGE IS THAT PARK IS SO BIG.
THE TRY TO COUNT THEM IS VERY DIFFICULT.
[00:40:01]
WE RAN THIS IMAGE THROUGH CHATGPT TO TRY TO GET US SOME NUMBERS, AND IT RANGED EVERYTHING FROM 2,000-12,000 AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN.ACCURACY, WE'RE NOT 100% SURE, BUT I DO FEEL LIKE ANECDOTALLY THAT THERE WAS MORE PEOPLE THAN LAST YEAR.
THIS YEAR WAS A LOT HOTTER, SO I THINK WE SAW PEOPLE MIGRATE MORE TO THE SHADE.
IT'S HARD TO COUNT PEOPLE UNDER TREES.
BUT I THINK WE SAW A LOT OF PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY EARLIER IN THE DAY SITTING UNDER THE TREES WHEN IT WAS REALLY HOT OUTSIDE.
WE ARE LOOKING AT SOME OTHER TECHNOLOGY, WE ACTUALLY JUST TALKED WITH DREW BRASFIELD HERE A SECOND AGO.
THEY ARE LOOKING AT SOME SOFTWARE THAT MAY HELP WITH SOME OF THIS ESTIMATION MOVING FORWARD.
WE'VE LOOKED AT ADDING PEOPLE COUNTERS AT THE ENTRANCE POINTS TO TRY TO SEE IF WE CAN DO THAT.
WE'VE LOOKED AT ADDING TRAFFIC COUNTERS TO SEE HOW MANY VEHICLES.
SURPRISINGLY, THERE IS A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT SHOW UP AND THEN LEAVE.
HAVING A TRAFFIC COUNTER COMING AND GOING WOULD BE HELPFUL AS WELL.
BUT I WOULD SAY ANYWHERE 2-12 THOUSAND.
BUT I THINK REALISTICALLY PROBABLY SIX IN THIS AREA, AND THEN THERE'S PEOPLE ALL THROUGHOUT THE PARK.
I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO SHOW YOU A COUPLE OTHER IMAGES.
THESE ARE ACTUALLY, AGAIN, IMAGES THAT APD WAS ABLE TO PULL.
THE ONE ON THE TOP LEFT IS BELL STREET.
ALL ALONG BELL STREET, PEOPLE WERE LITERALLY JUST PULLING OFF ONTO THE RIGHT OF WAY AND JUST PARKING THEIR CARS.
THE ONE ON THE TOP RIGHT IS THE LOWE'S PARKING LOT.
BOTTOM LEFT IS THE UNITED AREA, AND THEN THE BOTTOM RIGHT IS ALSO ALONG BELL.
YOU CAN SEE THE IMPACT IS FAR BEYOND THE PARK.
WE'VE GOT A LOT OF PEOPLE SPREAD OUT IN THE PARK.
SOME OF THEM WANT TO GO SEE THE CONCERT.
SOME OF THEM JUST WANT TO SIT AND WATCH FIREWORK.
WHETHER IT'S ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PARK, WHETHER IT'S ACROSS THE STREET, WE SAW A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PEOPLE.
AGAIN, JUST COUNTING THAT PEOPLE IN THAT MAIN AREA MAY NOT DO JUSTICE TO WHAT THIS EVENT ACTUALLY DOES.
THOSE ARE JUST SOME HIGH LEVEL PICTURES OF WHAT WE SAW OF THAT SPACE.
THEN BRIEFLY BEFORE IF THERE'S ANY DISCUSSION, I JUST WANTED TO TOUCH ON.
THIS IS THE NEXT EVENT THAT WE'VE GOT COMING UP.
THIS IS AN EVENT WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT.
WE STARTED IT LAST YEAR WITH A HOT AIR BALLOON GLOW.
WE HAD ONE HOT AIR BALLOON, AND WE DID OUR CANDY DROP OUT OF IT.
IT WAS BASICALLY OUR HALLOWEEN EVENT WHERE WE HAD A HOT AIR BALLOON AND WE DISTRIBUTED CANDY TO THE KIDS FROM THAT HOT AIR BALLOON.
WE'VE ACTUALLY LOOKED AT THIS PARTNER AND THEY'RE TRYING TO EXPAND THEIR PROGRAM AS WELL.
AGAIN, THIS IS VERY LOW COST TO THE CITY, SO WE'RE BASICALLY PAYING FOR THINGS LIKE THE CANDY, THE GAMES, THE PORTA POTTIES, THINGS LIKE THAT.
BUT THIS PARTNERSHIP WITH WHAT WE'RE CALLING PIRATES OF THE PARK, THEY WANT TO DO HOT AIR BALLOON GLOW IN THE EVENING, BUT ALSO THEY WANT TO DO A RACE IN THE MORNING.
WE THINK, AGAIN, THIS IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO PARTNER WITH DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS IN THE COMMUNITY TO ADD NEW EVENTS.
ONE OF THE THINGS WE WANT TO DO IS TRY TO DO QUARTERLY SPECIAL EVENTS FOR THE COMMUNITY, AND I THINK THIS WOULD BE OUR FALL ONE MOVING FORWARD.
OBVIOUSLY, WE HAVE THE JULY 5TH, AND NOW WE HAVE THE PIRATES IN THE PARK, AND WE THINK THIS COULD BE ANOTHER BIG EVENT AS IT CONTINUES TO GROW.
JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU A PREVIEW OF WHAT'S NEXT ON THE LARGER SPECIAL EVENT CALENDAR.
YOU HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR GET ANY INFORMATION?
>> COUNCIL, QUESTIONS? THEN WE'LL MOVE INTO A LITTLE BIT OF DIRECTION.
>> GREAT JOB. AGAIN, YOU YOUR STAFF AND EVERYBODY INVOLVED.
IT'S A HUGE DEAL FOR THE COMMUNITY WHEN YOU ALL GET TOGETHER. THANK YOU ALL.
>> MR. KASHUBA, THE ENTIRE TEAM, WHICH IS BIG, VERY PROFESSIONAL GROUP OF TRUE PROFESSIONALS, EVERYTHING FROM LOGISTICS ON TRAFFIC CONTROL, GETTING IN AND OUT.
YOU SPED UP A FEW THINGS BECAUSE WE WERE WATCHING A LIGHTNING SHOW ROLL IN.
MAYBE THE FIREWORKS DIDN'T EXACTLY MATCH THE MUSIC THERE TOWARDS THE END, BUT IT ALL LOOKED REALLY GOOD AND YOU GOT IT DONE BEFORE ANY WEATHER GOT US.
YOU WORK REALLY WELL. YOU GOT A GREAT TEAM.
I SEE MR. CHAMBERLAIN OUT THERE FROM OUTDOOR AMARILLO AND ALL THOSE GUYS.
YOU'VE REALLY COME A LONG WAY IN TWO YEARS.
I THINK ANYBODY THAT LOOKS AT THIS WOULD NOT SAY, Y'ALL HAVE ONLY DONE THIS ONE TIME BEFORE.
TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEAR BIRTHDAY FOR THE COUNTRY THAT WE LOVE AND GET TO CALL HOME AND GET TO ENJOY WITH FREEDOM.
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOUR BUDGET COME BACK.
I KNOW WHAT YOU SPENT THIS TIME AROUND.
I THINK COUNCIL WILL CONTINUE TO SUPPORT IT AND LOOK FOR WAYS TO PUSH MONIES OVER INTO THAT SO THAT YOU GUYS CAN DO THE FAIREST WILL AND DO OTHER THINGS THAT REALLY CONTINUE TO DRAW THAT UP.
I THINK WE WHEN WE FIRST SAT DOWN IN THE MAYOR'S OFFICE A COUPLE, WELL, THREE YEARS AGO NOW, THE VISION FOR THIS WAS, LET'S BRING THIS BACK BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T DONE IT FOR A LONG TIME.
THE CITY GOT AWAY FROM DOING IT.
WE WERE JUST LOOKING AT THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO DO THIS.
[00:45:05]
WE NEEDED TO WALK IT IN.IT WORKED OUT REALLY WELL BECAUSE IT WAS ON A FRIDAY WHEN THE 4TH ON A THURSDAY TO DO THE INDEPENDENCE DAY PLUS ONE.
THEN WE'VE WALKED IT INTO SATURDAY, BUT I THINK WITH THAT, WE'VE SLOW WALKED IT FAR ENOUGH, AND I THINK THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO PUT IT ON THE FOURTH.
EVEN THOUGH IT'S A LITTLE COMPETITIVE, THAT'S THE WAY IT IS, WHETHER YOU'RE GOING TO LAKE TANGLEWOOD OR CANYON OR YOU'VE GOT SOMETHING ELSE.
IT'S ANOTHER OPTION, AND I THINK WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT ON THE FOURTH.
COUNCIL, COULD YOU GUYS SPEAK TO THAT AT ALL ON GIVING SOME DIRECTION FOR THE DAY IN PARTICULAR?
>> I LIKE THE FOURTH. I THINK THAT'S THE EASIEST BECAUSE IT'S CONSTANTLY JUST GOING TO BE A MOVING TARGET.
IS IT GOING TO BE A MONDAY OR TUESDAY OR WEDNESDAY, BUT THE FOURTH IS THE FOURTH.
I THINK ESPECIALLY NEXT YEAR, BEING THE 250TH, NO QUESTION IT NEEDS TO BE ON THE FOURTH.
>> ANYBODY DISAGREE WITH THAT?
>> NO. I THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE IT'S ONE OF THOSE HOLIDAYS THAT'S ON THAT DAY, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE CELEBRATE IT ON THAT DAY.
>> I KNOW THAT I APPRECIATE THE PATIENCE OF PEOPLE SAY, WELL, IT'S NOT REALLY UNPATRIOTIC, WE SEE WHAT YOU'RE DOING, BUT THE GOAL WAS TO GET TO THE FOURTH AND REALLY DO IT.
PLUS, ON A SUNDAY, YOU GOT TO THINK ABOUT, WHAT DO WE NOT GET A RETURN ON AND THROWING A PARTY FOR YOU, FOR OURSELVES, IF YOU'RE NOT ATTENDING BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT EARLY MONDAY MORNING MEETINGS, AND IT'S A SUNDAY EVENING, AND IT'S ALREADY JULY 5TH.
WE'VE DONE IT WELL TO WORK WELL WITH OUR OTHER COMMUNITY PARTNERS, BUT I'D LIKE TO SEE IT ON THE FOURTH.
YOU CAN TAKE THAT BACK TO YOUR COMMITTEE AND YOUR TEAM, SEE WHAT YOU THERE.
I THINK THAT COMPETITION IS FUN.
I THINK EARLIER IN THE DAYS, ESPECIALLY IF YOU MIX IN SOME WATER, YOU CAN DEAL WITH THE HEAT.
IF IT'S MUDDY WATER, AND THERE'S MAYBE SOME STRONG POLICE OFFICERS PULLING SOME FIREFIGHTERS INTO A PIT WITH A ROPE.
THESE ARE THINGS THAT WE MAYBE IT'S THIS GYM VERSUS THAT GYM OR WHATEVER.
THOSE ARE FUN THINGS THAT THE COMMUNITY CAN GET INVOLVED IN.
ALL YOU GOT TO DO IS DIG A BIG HOLE.
THEN EVERYBODY LIKES SEEING THAT.
YOU HAVE REALLY GOOD PARTNERS.
WE'VE BEEN PLEASED TO SUPPORT YOU.
ALL WE DID WAS PUT OUT AN IDEA AND SAID, HEY, TELL US WHAT YOU CAN DO, AND THEN YOU'VE EXCEEDED THE EXPECTATIONS EVERY TIME.
I THINK YOU EXCEEDED THE BUDGET ONCE, BUT NOT BY MUCH.
LET US GET YOUR BUDGET WHERE YOU NEED IT TO BE COMING INTO 2026 AND LET US SUPPORT YOU ON THE FOURTH.
WHAT OTHER DIRECTION DO YOU NEED?
>> I THINK THAT'S ALL WE NEED. WE'LL BE HAPPY TO BRING THAT INFORMATION BACK TO COUNCIL.
>> THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY NOW THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO DO THIS IS WHY IT'S FRESH IN EVERYBODY'S MIND, MAYBE TALK TO THE VENDORS, THE FIREWORKS, AND THAT TYPE DEAL, SEE WHAT CHARGE, WHAT DIFFERENCE IT IS VERSUS NOT BEING ON THE FOURTH.
WHEN BUDGET COMES IN OR WE TALK TO OUR PARTNERS LIKE OUTDOOR AMARILLO, WE'VE GOT AN IDEA OF WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT AN INCREASE, AND EVEN WITH STAFF ON OVERTIME, THAT TYPE DEAL.
WE'VE GOT A BETTER IDEA, ESPECIALLY IT'S A GOOD TIME SINCE BUDGET IS COMING UP.
>> I THINK, ESPECIALLY AS WE LOOK FORWARD, IF THIS IS AN ONGOING EVENT, THEN I THINK WE COULD START DOING BIDS AND TRYING TO GET THAT PRICE DOWN AND LOCK IT IN OVER MULTI YEARS AS OPPOSED TO JUST DOING EVERY YEAR.
I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING WE'LL LOOK AT AS WELL IS IF WE'RE GOING TO STICK WITH THE FOURTH, THEN WE CAN START BIDDING IT AND GETTING COMPETITIVE BIDS MOVING FORWARD AND LOCK THAT IN.
>> WELL, LET THIS COUNCIL COMMIT TO THE NEXT TWO YEARS PLUS HERE, AND YOU CAN RELY ON THAT LEADERSHIP.
I'M SPEAKING AS THOUGH WE ALL LOVE IT.
I HOPE WE LOVE THE IDEA OF YOUR FOUR EVENTS QUARTERLY AND DOING SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THE HOT AIR BALLOON THING IN THE FALL, AND HOW YOU TIE THAT IN.
EVEN DRIVING DOWN WESTERN STREET, LITTLE SAM HOUSTON PARK OVER THERE, WHEN YOU'RE DOING MOVIE NIGHT IN THE PARK, AND YOU'VE GOT ALL SORTS OF STUFF GOING, THAT'S THAT SMALL TOWN COMMUNITY FEEL, BUT IN A REALLY BIG TOWN.
THEN THANK YOU TO OUR CITIZENS FOR KNOWING HOW TO BE RESPONSIBLE AND MATURE AND HANDLE YOURSELVES.
WE TOOK ALL SORTS OF CRITICISM LIKE BEER GARDEN, REALLY? THAT'S HOW YOU'RE GOING TO DO THIS? WE ARE ADULTS, AND THE KIDS PLAY AND EVERYBODY TOOK CARE OF EACH OTHER. WE HAD A FEW THINGS.
WE ENDED UP FINDING ONE YOUNG ONE THAT GOT LOST, AND SO SHE WAS RETURNED.
FIRST RESPONDERS OUT THERE DO A GREAT JOB, AND YOUR TEAM DOES A GREAT JOB. THANK YOU AGAIN.
[9.C. Posting City of Amarillo check register (or similar) to the city website]
IF YOU COME BACK UP AND TELL US WHAT YOU'VE GOT ON THE CHECK REGISTRY.>> MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I'VE ASKED STEPHANIE TO PULL UP THE NEW FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY PAGE THAT WE HAVE DEVELOPED.
[00:50:04]
IF SHE'LL SCROLL DOWN JUST A LITTLE BIT, THIS IS ON THE CITY OF AMARILLO WEBSITE.YOU'LL NOTICE RIGHT THERE AT THE TOP, IT SAYS, PAGE IN PROGRESS.
SO THIS IS CERTAINLY STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS.
WE ARE CONTINUING TO DEVELOP IT.
OUR TEAM LED BY KRISTIN, HAS DONE A PHENOMENAL JOB GOING OUT AND RESEARCHING A LOT OF OTHER CITIES FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY PAGES, AND HAS REALLY RESEARCHED WHAT BEST PRACTICES IS, AND INCORPORATED THAT, AND ACTUALLY MADE IT EVEN A LITTLE NICER ON OUR PAGE.
SO I'M VERY PLEASED WITH THE WAY THIS PAGE HAS TURNED OUT, BUT IT WILL CONTINUE TO GROW AS WE'RE POSTING INFORMATION OUT THERE.
SO WE DO HAVE A POLICY STATEMENT THERE AT THE TOP.
IF YOU JUST CLICK ON IT, IT EXPANDS, AND IT TELLS YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHY WE'RE DOING WHAT WE'RE DOING.
THEN IF YOU GO DOWN A LITTLE BIT MORE, STEPHANIE, YOU'LL SEE OUR CITY OF AMARILLO CHECK REGISTERS, AND THERE'S ANOTHER BUTTON YOU CAN EXPAND THERE.
AND IT TALKS ABOUT THAT THESE ARE CITY OF AMARILLO CHECK REGISTERS.
WE ALSO HAVE INFORMATION FOR THESE OTHER ENTITIES.
THEY'RE NOT INCLUDED ON THIS PAGE, BUT WE HAVE INCLUDED A LINK THERE TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST, IF SOMEONE WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO ACCESS THAT INFORMATION AS WELL.
DOWN BELOW THAT, WE HAVE STARTED POSTING OUR CURRENT CHECK REGISTERS FROM THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR IN OUR NEW FINANCIAL SOFTWARE.
WE ARE STILL WORKING TO FINALIZE THE FIRST QUARTER OF GENERAL LEDGERS.
THAT WILL BE COMING OUT IN THIS SECTION VERY SOON.
AND THEN WE'VE GOT THREE YEARS WORTH OF ARCHIVED CHECK REGISTERS.
THESE ARE COMING OUT OF OUR PRIOR FINANCIAL SYSTEM, SO THEY'RE GOING TO LOOK AND FEEL A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.
EVERYTHING IS POSTED OUT THERE IN AN EXCEL FORMAT, SO THEY CAN BE SEARCHED, SORTED, THOSE TYPE OF THINGS AS WELL.
SO YES, AS STEPHANIE'S DOING, YOU JUST EXPANDED AS YOU GO.
AND WHAT WE WILL DO IS WE'RE GOING TO KEEP A ROLLING 36 MONTHS OUT THERE.
SO AS SOON AS WE HAVE A NEW MONTH AVAILABLE TO POST OUT THERE, THE OLDEST MONTH WILL COME OFF.
AND SO THIS WILL BE A CONSTANTLY MOVING AND EVOLVING PAGE.
AND THAT IS TO MEET THE STATE COMPTROLLER'S TRANSPARENCY STAR PROGRAM, WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE ACTIVELY WORKING TOWARDS WITH THIS PAGE, AND IT REQUIRES 36 MONTHS OF CHECK REGISTER.
THEN WE'VE GOT ONE LAST SECTION HERE THAT JUST TALKS ABOUT SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO OUR BANK ACCOUNTS.
THE CITY DOES HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF BANK ACCOUNTS.
MOST OF THESE DO NOT HAVE HARDLY ANY TRANSACTIONS, IF ANY, POSTING DURING THE MONTH.
SOME OF THEM ARE RELATED TO GRANT PROGRAMS, AND SO ALMOST EVERY PIECE OF INFORMATION THAT'S GOING THROUGH THOSE BANK STATEMENTS IS CONFIDENTIAL, AND THE FEDS REQUIRE US TO REDACT ALL OF IT.
SO THOSE WE ARE NOT ACTIVELY POSTING OUT ON THIS WEBSITE.
WE'RE POSTING OUR MAIN BANK ACCOUNT, WHICH HAS THE VAST MAJORITY OF ALL OF OUR TRANSACTIONS GOING THROUGH IT, IT HAS OUR CHECKS.
THEN THE GENERAL LEDGERS WILL HAVE OUR WIRES, OUR DEPOSITS, IT'LL HAVE THE FUND INFORMATION.
BUT WE DO HAVE A SPOT DOWN HERE THAT SAYS IF SOMEONE WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ONE OF THESE, THEY CAN CLICK ON THE PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST LINK, AND IT WILL TAKE THEM THERE, AND THEY CAN REQUEST THAT INFORMATION AT THAT POINT.
SO, WANTED TO OPEN IT UP IF YOU ALL HAD ANY QUESTIONS OR ANY FEEDBACK RELATED TO THIS PAGE.
>> MRS. STORRS, OR ACTUALLY THE CITY SECRETARY, WOULD YOU MIND CLICKING ON, IF THIS IS ACTIVE, CAN WE OPEN ONE? SAY, DUE MAY 2025.
AND NOT THAT WE WANT TO GO LOOK DETAILS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT YOU CAN SEE THE BREAKDOWN, CHECK, CHECK NUMBER, PAYEE NAME, THE AMOUNT.
THIS IS ALL RECONCILED, CORRECT?
>> SO WE DON'T PUT OUT ANY INFORMATION THAT'S WRONG, BUT IF WE PUT SOMETHING OUT THAT CHANGED FOR WHATEVER REASON, SOMETHING CAME BACK ON BANK ISSUE, SOMETHING WAS MISHANDLED, WE WOULD THEN GO WHERE AND CHANGE IT.
AND IF WE DID CHANGE THAT, ASSUMING YOU COULD HAVE SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE, HOW WOULD YOU HANDLE IT? JUST GO IN AND CHANGE THAT, OR WHAT WOULD IT BE LIKE.
>> SO IF THERE WAS A CHECK THAT, LET'S SAY, WE VOIDED SIX MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF ISSUE, I DO NOT ANTICIPATE GOING BACK AND REISSUING A CHECK REGISTER ON THAT.
SO WE HAVE THAT GOING ON ALL THE TIME WE SHEET CHECKS TO THE STATE THAT HAVE TO BE VOIDED AFTER A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME, WE WILL BE POSTING THESE AFTER IT'S RECONCILED, AND THEN THAT WILL BE A SNAPSHOT IN TIME OF THAT CHECK REGISTER.
SO, OTHERWISE, WE WOULD BE ESSENTIALLY, WE COULD BE REPRODUCING THESE ON A WEEKLY BASIS, GOING BACK A WHOLE NUMBER OF MONTHS.
>> AND THEN IF YOU'LL GO TO SAY, GO TO 2024, JUST DUE DECEMBER, IF YOU WOULD, MA'AM.
[00:55:07]
IS THIS THE OVERALL DIFFERENCE IN THE LOOK?>> YES, THIS IS OUR OLD SYSTEM, AND THAT IS, YOU'LL SEE A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION THAT WE CAN PULL OUT OF THE OLD SYSTEM AS COMPARED TO THE NEW SYSTEM.
AND WE'VE HAD SOME OF OUR IT DEVELOPERS WORKING ON THIS.
THEY HAVE SPENT, SEVERAL HOURS OVER THE PAST FEW WEEKS TRYING TO DEVELOP CUSTOMIZED REPORTS.
OUR OLD SYSTEM DOES NOT HAVE NEAR THE ABILITY FOR US TO CUSTOMIZE REPORTS.
AND SO WE ARE POSTING THE CHECK REGISTERS THAT ARE PRODUCED BY IT'S BASICALLY THE CAN CHECK REGISTER FROM THAT SYSTEM, AND WE WILL NOT BE PROVIDING ANYTHING ELSE BECAUSE WE CANNOT GET THE REPORTS TO CUSTOMIZE TO MATCH WHAT THE NEW SYSTEM DOES.
>> SO REALLY, AS YOU'RE LOOKING DOWN THROUGH THAT, YOU DON'T SEE DEPARTMENT, YOU DON'T SEE WHERE IT WENT, WHY IT WENT SOMEWHERE.
YOU CAN TRACK THE PAYEE NAME AND THE TOTAL.
>> AND THEN MRS. COGGINS, IF YOU CAN CLICK OUT OF THAT, DO WE HAVE THE WIRE TRANSFERS, GL SIDE, THE GENERAL LEDGER SIDE?
>> WE DO NOT HAVE ONE POSTED YET.
THEY WERE FINALIZING THE ONE FOR MARCH, AND IT SHOULD BE POSTED OUT VERY SOON.
IT WILL BE A SEPARATE SECTION ON THERE THAT DEFINES WHAT IS CONTAINED IN THAT REPORT.
AND IT WILL BE STARTING WITH MARCH OF 2025, AND THEN GOING QUARTERLY FORWARD.
>> SO IN THE PREVIOUS THREE YEARS, WHAT WE'RE NOT POSTING RIGHT NOW, OR WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING, AND COUNCIL WOULD LIKE YOUR FEEDBACK, YOU'RE NOT POSTING THE WIRE TRANSFERS, THE DEPOSITS, AND THE GL, THE GENERAL LEDGER SIDE OF '24, '23 AND '22, TO THIS FORMAT.
SO YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SEE BACK FROM MARCH GOING FORWARD?
>> AND THE REASON BEING FOR THAT IS REDUCTION, IS THAT RIGHT?
>> NO. THE OLD SYSTEM CANNOT PRODUCE A REPORT WITH THAT SAME INFORMATION THAT THE NEW ONE CAN.
>> CANNOT PRODUCE THE REPORT WITH THE SAME INFORMATION, RIGHT?
>> IT WOULDN'T SHOW WHICH FUND IT WENT TO AND WHAT THE PURPOSE OF IT WAS.
WE DON'T HAVE THAT FLEXIBILITY IN THE OLD SYSTEM.
NOW, IF SOMEONE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A GENERAL LEDGER, WE CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT.
AND THEN IF THEY HAD CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS THEY WANTED MORE INFORMATION ON, WE COULD CERTAINLY PROVIDE THAT THROUGH A SEPARATE REQUEST.
>> SO CORRECT ME IF I DON'T UNDERSTAND.
IF WE WERE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING SPECIFIC, YOU COULD GO IN AND FIND IT?
>> SO IF THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT THE ICE DEPARTMENT, AND IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID $1 MILLION BUT IT WASN'T, AND DID WE GET THE MONEY OR NOT, YOU CAN GO LOOK AT THAT AT '22, '23?
>> BUT THEN IF YOU GRAB ALL OF THAT DATA AND YOU PUT IT OUT HERE, YOU'RE SAYING ON SOME MACRO SCALE, IT CAN'T COMPUTE THAT AND JUST PUT IT ON THE PAGE?
WE DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE CUSTOMIZED REPORTS IN THE OLD SYSTEM TO GO POOL THIS INFORMATION FROM THIS PLACE, THIS INFORMATION FROM THAT PLACE, THIS INFORMATION FROM THIS PLACE, AND BRING IT ALL IN AND MAKE SURE THAT IT'S BRINGING IT IN FOR THE EXACT SAME TRANSACTION.
I WOULD NOT WANT TO MISTAKENLY PUT INACCURATE INFORMATION OUT THERE BY TRYING TO PUT A REPORT TOGETHER THAT WE HAVE NOT HAD SUCCESS WITH.
>> WHAT ABOUT GROSS TOTALS? COULD IT DO THAT? CAN WE JUST HAVE WELL, LIKE, TOTAL ACTIVITY IN '24 ON THAT GL, SO THAT IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT BOTH SIDES, YOU'RE LOOKING AT EXPENDITURES, AND THEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT REVENUES.
IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO?
>> I MEAN, WE CAN CERTAINLY POST A GENERAL LEDGER OUT THERE, BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO HAVE THE INFORMATION THAT THE NEW GENERAL LEDGERS HAVE.
>> IT WOULD HAVE DOLLAR AMOUNTS.
>> IT WOULD HAVE DOLLAR AMOUNTS?
>> SO YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO SEE ALL OF THE TRANSACTIONS AS FAR AS REVENUES AND THEN THE TOTAL? IF YOU WANTED TO TOTAL IT UP?
>> IF YOU WANT A BANK ACCOUNT GENERAL LEDGER, IT WOULD SHOW POSITIVE AMOUNTS GOING IN THAT WOULD BE LIKE DEPOSITS AND THE NEGATIVE AMOUNTS GOING OUT, WHICH COULD BE CHECKS, WIRES, ACHS, ALL OF THAT.
OUR GENERAL LEDGER, IN OUR OLD SYSTEM, DOESN'T HAVE A WAY ON THAT REPORT TO SHOW THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHICH ONE IS WHICH FROM A GENERAL LEDGER STANDPOINT.
BUT THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS WOULD ALL BE THERE, AND ALL THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS ARE CORRECT.
BUT IF YOU WANTED MORE INFORMATION ON A SPECIFIC TRANSACTION, WE WOULD HAVE TO GO IN AND RESEARCH THAT AND PULL ALL THAT INFORMATION SEPARATELY.
AND WE CERTAINLY CAN DO IT, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S A GOOD USE OF OUR TEAM'S TIME TO GO IN AND DO THAT WORK ON EVERY SINGLE TRANSACTION.
[01:00:03]
WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH MANPOWER TO DO THAT.>> AND IF YOU HAD A FOY, IF YOU HAD A REQUEST, YOU'D BE ABLE TO GO AND DO IT, BUT THEN YOU JUST YOU'D HAVE TO DO IT SPECIFIC FOR WHATEVER YEAR THEY ASKED OR WHATEVER MONTHS OR WHAT NOT.
BUT YOU'RE SAYING IF THAT INFORMATION'S AVAILABLE IF THEY REQUESTED IT, WE'RE JUST NOT WANTING TO PUT IT UP ON LIKE THE LOOK BACK.
>> SO IT'S MORE SUMMARIZED INFORMATION IS WHAT WE CAN PRODUCE EASILY OUT OF THE SYSTEM, BUT THEN TO DIG IN AND GET THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LIKE WHAT FUND DID IT POST TO, WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF IT.
THAT TAKES EXTRA STEPS IN DIGGING IN ON A TRANSACTION BY TRANSACTION BASIS.
AND SO WE COULD DO THAT IF SOMEONE SUBMITTED AN OPEN RECORDS REQUEST.
NOW, IF THEY ASKED FOR IT FOR ALL OF 2024, WE WOULD HAVE TO DO AN ESTIMATE ON WHAT AMOUNT OF TIME THAT WOULD TAKE US TO DO, AND IT COULD BE A PRETTY HEFTY COST ASSOCIATED WITH IT.
>> AND IF I CAN ADD SOMETHING JUST FROM THE PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT PERSPECTIVE, IT DOES NOT REQUIRE US TO DO RESEARCH OR TO CREATE THINGS WE DON'T HAVE.
AND SO IF WE HAD A REQUEST SUCH AS THAT, WE WOULD LIKELY EXPORT WHAT IS THERE IN THE GENERAL LEDGER, PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION, AND THEN LET THE REQUESTER DO WITH IT, WHAT THEY WOULD.
>> COUNCIL, CONCERNS, QUESTIONS, WE'VE MADE A LOT OF PROGRESS.
I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU WORKING ON IT.
THE PAGE LOOKS GOOD FROM MARCH MOVING FORWARD.
SO WOULD LIKE TO HEAR WHERE COUNCIL'S AT ON THE PREVIOUS THREE YEARS.
>> WELL, JUST A CLARIFYING QUESTION, MR. MAYOR, IN TERMS OF WHY WE WOULD NEED THAT AT THIS POINT IF WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE LAST SIX MONTHS.
>> SO THE CONVERSATION WAS GEARED, AND IN JUST A CONVERSATION BETWEEN YOURSELF AND MYSELF, I HATE TO PUT OUT, I MEAN, IT'S A CAN OF WORMS YOU OPEN UP.
LIKE, I HATE TO PUT OUT THE THREE PREVIOUS YEARS IN PART OR PARTIALLY.
BECAUSE IT INVITES OR BORROWS THE TROUBLE OF WHAT ARE YOU NOT SHOWING ME? SO, LIKE, TO PUT THE PREVIOUS THREE YEARS CHECK REGISTERS UP IS GOOD.
BUT THEN THE DIFFICULTY IN PUTTING THE WIRE TRANSFERS AND THE REVENUES IN INVITES THE ADDITIONAL QUESTION THAT WE'RE AVOIDING.
SO NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED SOMETIMES IN ALL THINGS, PUBLIC SERVICE.
SO HERE WE ARE. WE'RE TRYING TO DO IT RIGHT, WE'RE TRYING TO PUT EVERYTHING OUT.
WE'VE GOT THREE YEARS OF HALF OF OUR BOOKS POSTED.
SO IF I CAN GET SOME LEVEL OF EXPECTATION ON THE OTHER HALF TO WHERE IT'S AVAILABLE, THEN THE FEW PEOPLE THAT WOULD HAVE THE TIME AND THE INTEREST IN GOING AND LOOKING AT THAT WOULD KNOW WHERE TO LOOK.
BUT THEN, REALLY, LIKE, MOVING FORWARD, I THINK WHEN WE SEE ON THE '25 FROM MARCH FORWARD, YOU WILL SEE EVERYTHING.
SO I THINK WE'RE GOING TO BE VERY SATISFIED FROM MARCH MOVING FORWARD.
AND I STATED LAST TIME THAT WE HAD A BRIEF DISCUSSION ON THIS, I ALMOST WOULD RATHER NOT PUT THE THREE YEARS PREVIOUS CHECK REGISTERS UP ON THE WEBSITE.
>> OUR CITY MANAGER HAD ASKED US TO PURSUE THE TRANSPARENCY STAR PROGRAM, AND THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THAT PROGRAM.
AND SO IF WE WANT TO WAIT TWO-AND-A-HALF YEARS TO PURSUE THAT PROGRAM, WITH DIRECTION FROM OUR CITY MANAGER, WE COULD CERTAINLY GO A DIFFERENT DIRECTION ON THAT.
SO IT'S SOMETHING THAT I THINK WOULD PROVIDE REALLY GOOD INFORMATION AND SHOW THAT WE'RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH WHAT THE STATE COMPTROLLERS REQUIREMENTS ARE, BUT I MEAN, THIS MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS.
AND SO THERE'S A FEW OTHER THINGS ASIDE FROM BANK ACCOUNTS THAT WE WILL ADD TO THIS PAGE TO MEET THAT PROGRAM.
BUT IF WE NEED TO GO A DIFFERENT DIRECTION, WE WILL WAIT AND TAKE THAT DIRECTION.
>> NO. ON THE PROGRAM, WHAT IS THAT? IS THAT JUST A CERTIFICATE THAT THEY SEND US ONCE A YEAR?
>> IT'S ANOTHER THING FOR OUR TAXPAYERS TO KNOW THAT WE ARE MEETING A HIGH LEVEL OF TRANSPARENCY ACCORDING TO WHAT THE STATE COMPTROLLERS REQUIREMENTS ARE.
>> I MEAN, IT'S A GREEN PARTICIPATION RIBBON FOR A LOT OF THINGS COMPARED TO WHAT WE'RE DOING,LIKE, THE WORK IS THE WORK, AND I LOVE THE WORK THAT YOU GUYS ARE DOING FROM MARCH FORWARD.
SO QUESTION TO COUNCIL WOULD BE, DO YOU WANT THE THREE YEARS PREVIOUS CHECK REGISTERS PUT UP WITHOUT THE GENERAL LEDGER? BASED ON THAT THAT'S THE MOST EFFICIENT USE OF THE RESOURCES AND STAFF'S TIME?
>> THE LAST THREE YEARS, I WOULD SAY WE'RE GOOD WITH IT THERE.
WE DISCUSSED, LIKE YOU SAID, THE STAFF AND THE TIME THAT IT WOULD TAKE TO PUT ALL THAT.
I DON'T THINK THAT'S A GOOD USE OF RESOURCES, FOR THEM TO SEARCH THAT.
[01:05:01]
SO THOUGH THIS MAY OPEN UP A CAN OF WORMS, LIKE YOU SAID, I THINK IT AT LEAST HELPS BE TRANSPARENT BECAUSE WE'VE GOT WHAT WE'VE GOT.SOMEBODY CAN CERTAINLY REQUEST ADDITIONAL IF THEY WANT TO SEE IT.
BUT I THINK SHOWING IT IS BETTER THAN NOT SHOWING IT. IN MY OPINION.
>> YES, SIR. AND I WOULD AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN TIPPS ON THAT, EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT PERFECT, IT FULFILLS OUR OBLIGATION UNDER THE STATE STATUTE, AND IT ALLOWS US AT LEAST THAT LEVEL OF TRANSPARENCY, BUT IT ALSO ALLOWS THE PUBLIC IF THEY HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS ON IT, THAT THEY HAVE THE ABILITY THEN TO CONTACT AND SAY, HERE'S WHAT WE NEED.
>> I THINK IT'S TOO MUCH OF A BURDEN TO GO BACK AND TRY TO CORRELATE THAT DATA.
I THINK WHERE WE ARE IS GOOD AND MOVING FORWARD, WE'RE IN A GOOD SPOT.
>> MRS. STORRS, LET ME SAY THIS EXCEEDS MY ORIGINAL EXPECTATION.
SO WHEN YOU BROUGHT OUT THE IDEA OF, "HEY, WE CAN GO BACK AND GET THREE YEARS OF CHECK REGISTERS AND PUT THEM UP," THAT WAS MORE THAN WHAT I WAS ASKING FOR.
AND I EVEN THINK WITH THE PUBLIC ORIGINALLY ASKING.
I THINK IT'S HOPEFULLY EASY TO FOLLOW.
SO WE APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION, COUNCIL, YOU HAVE ANYTHING FURTHER FOR MRS. STORRS.
PLEASE TELL THE DEPARTMENT, THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT, AND ALSO WITH MISS KRISTIN DOING THE WEBSITE. SO THANK YOU MAYOR.
WE'RE GOING TO KEEP PUSHING AND GET THROUGH DISCUSSION ITEMS. COUNCILMAN SIMPSON IS BRINGING FORWARD ITEM 9D,
[9.D. Possible resolution establishing a policy requiring two readings for resolutions prior to final adoption ]
SO I'LL HAND THAT OVER AND ASK YOU TO LEAD THAT.>> I'LL TRY TO BE QUICK WITH THE MOST BORING ITEM ON THE AGENDA TODAY, BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT I JUST WANTED TO BRING UP.
TO ME, WHEN WE PUT OUT AN AGENDA ON A FRIDAY AND PEOPLE ARE SEEING THINGS FOR THE FIRST TIME THAT ARE THEN APPROVED FINALLY AND GIVEN A FINAL AUTHORIZATION ON TUESDAY, HISTORICALLY, THAT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT, I DON'T KNOW, JUST SOMETIMES I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC, AND I THINK WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THE PUBLIC HAS A TIME TO DIGEST AND LEARN ABOUT THINGS.
IN THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL, WE PUT A ROLLING AGENDA IN PLACE, WHERE IT HAS THINGS THAT MAY BE COMING ON FROM THE CITY IN THE FUTURE.
WHILE THAT HELPED, I STILL DON'T THINK IT REALLY HELPED MAKING SURE THAT WE DON'T GET TOO FAR AHEAD OF THE PUBLIC, AND WE GIVE PEOPLE AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE INPUT ON ITEMS OR BECOME AWARE OF ITEMS. A LOT OF PEOPLE, NOT IN THIS ROOM, BUT MOST PEOPLE, ARE NOT WAITING FOR THE AGENDA TO COME OUT ON FRIDAY TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS.
THEY MAY NOT FIND OUT ABOUT SOMETHING UNTIL NEXT WEEK OR THE WEEK AFTER THAT.
WHAT I WANTED TO LOOK AT IS LOOK AT WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW WITH APPROVING ORDINANCES, AND MOST OF THOSE, WHICH REQUIRE TWO READINGS, AND TO MAKE A PROPOSAL FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THAT MAYBE WE EXPAND THAT A LITTLE BIT SO THAT IF THERE ARE TIMES WHERE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T GET TOO FAR AHEAD OF THE PUBLIC OR IT'S NOT A ONE AND DONE ON SOMETHING, PARTICULARLY IF IT DOES AFFECT THE PUBLIC WITHOUT NECESSARILY BOGGING DOWN BUSINESS.
I'LL GO THE NEXT SLIDE REAL QUICK.
OUR CHARTER RIGHT NOW SAYS, ANY ORDINANCE THAT IS PASSED HAS TO HAVE THOSE TWO READINGS.
IN OTHER WORDS, IT CAN'T BE PASSED ON THE FIRST DAY THAT IT COMES BEFORE US.
ANY ORDINANCE THAT WE HAVE, OFTENTIMES PLANNING AND ZONING, OUR BUDGET IS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE, THOSE TYPE OF THINGS REQUIRE TWO OPPORTUNITIES.
NOT ALL OF THEM HAVE TO BE ON THE DISCUSSION OR ACTION ITEM.
OBVIOUSLY, SOMETIMES WE HAVE MANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE ACTION AGENDA FIRST TIME, AND THEN THEY GO TO CONSENT THE SECOND TIME, BUT THEY'RE TWO TIMES THERE.
THE ONLY THING THAT CAN'T BE IS AN EMERGENCY MEASURE, AND I'LL GO OVER THAT IN A SECOND.
IF YOU'LL GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, THE STATE LAW TALKS ABOUT A COUPLE OF THINGS WHERE SINGLE MEETING READING IS ALLOWED FOR THE GOVERNING BODY.
YOU'LL SEE THERE'S A LIST THERE.
REALLY, MOST OF THIS HAS TO REVOLVE AROUND INVESTMENTS OR ISSUING DEBT.
AS I UNDERSTAND, MAYBE STAFF COULD ADD A LITTLE BIT TO THIS.
WE'RE LOCKING IN INTEREST RATES ON THOSE DAYS.
WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT ISSUING DEBT AND THOSE TYPES OF THINGS, IT'S BETTER TO GO AHEAD AND LOCK IT IN, AND WE'VE SEEN TIMES WHERE WE'VE HAD ADVANTAGES BY HAVING A GOOD INTEREST RATE ON THAT.
THERE ARE CERTAIN MECHANICS THAT WHEN IT COMES TO ISSUING DEBT OR PUBLIC SECURITY, WHERE THAT WOULD NOT BE THE BEST WAY TO BE ABLE TO DO IT.
IN MANY TIMES, THOSE ARE ISSUES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED BY COUNCIL, PROBABLY MANY TIMES IN MEETINGS BEFORE.
THERE'S A COUPLE OF EXCEPTIONS THAT WORK TOWARDS THAT, THAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO DO THAT, AND WE DO THAT BECAUSE THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT REASONS AND ADVANTAGES FOR THE CITY.
THE NEXT SLIDE TALKS ABOUT EMERGENCY MEASURES.
WE'VE HAD THOSE BEFORE, EMERGENCY MEASURES FOR FLOODING OR WHATEVER ELSE, WHEN THE EMERGENCY SITUATION COMES UP, THAT WE'RE ABLE TO DO THAT.
[01:10:02]
THE NEXT PAGE GOES OVER SOME OF THE ONE READING EXAMPLES, THINGS THAT WE DO AND HISTORICALLY DO PASS IN ONE TIME, AND MOST OF THESE REVOLVE AROUND RESOLUTIONS.FOR EXAMPLE, WE'VE PASSED 37 RESOLUTIONS THIS YEAR THAT, IN MOST INSTANCES, APPEARED ON THE AGENDA ON FRIDAY, AND WE'RE GIVEN FINAL APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING TUESDAY.
SOME OF THOSE THINGS INCLUDE GRANTS, THE CITY ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS, BUDGETS, AEDC, TIRZ, THE AEDC BYLAWS, THE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT PROTOCOLS FOR OUTSIDE COUNSEL.
YOU SEE SOME OF THESE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE LISTED THERE.
OTHER THINGS THAT ARE DONE IN ONE READING, INCLUDE CHAPTER 380 AGREEMENTS, SOME TAX ABATEMENTS, PURCHASE AGREEMENTS, LEASE AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS.
WHAT THE PROPOSAL HAS, AND THERE IS A FIRST VERSION OF IT THAT'S INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET, IS JUST TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AT WHEN WE LOOK AT THESE RESOLUTIONS, PARTICULARLY BECAUSE MANY OF THEM DO HAVE THINGS THAT IMPACT THE PUBLIC ABOUT INSTITUTING, LIKE WE DO WITH ORDINANCES, AN ADDITIONAL READING BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL IS GIVEN.
I TALKED WITH STAFF ABOUT CREATING WHAT THAT MAY LOOK LIKE.
BUT THAT'S THE PROPOSAL THAT I WANTED TO BRING TODAY FOR COUNSEL TO CONSIDER AND PROVIDE ANY INPUT OR POKE HOLES IN, IF THIS WOULD BE A PROBLEM OR ISSUE THAT COULD CAUSE DETRIMENT, OR IS THERE ENOUGH ADVANTAGE TO THIS FOR THE PUBLIC AND A GOOD THING TO DO THAT WE COULD LOOK AT DOING THIS.
>> HEY, LES, I'VE GOT A QUESTION.
SOUNDS LIKE YOU DID YOUR HOMEWORK FOR SURE.
ON THESE RESOLUTIONS, THESE 37 PASSED IN THE FIRST READING, TO SEE IF YOU KNOW THIS, BUT DID THESE HAVE DISCUSSION ITEMS BEFORE? WERE THEY DISCUSSED? BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE MUDS, AEDC BYLAWS.
IF I REMEMBER RIGHT, WE DISCUSSED THAT SEVERAL TIMES.
WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING IS, WE HAVE THE DISCUSSION, HOWEVER MANY TIMES WE GET TO A RESOLUTION.
WE STILL READ THE RESOLUTION ONCE, AND THEN IT WOULD COME BACK THE NEXT MEETING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE ACTION.
>> THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED AS IT DOES WITH ORDINANCES, BUT THERE'S NOTHING IN OUR ORDINANCES THAT REQUIRES THAT.
IN OTHER WORDS, WE COULD HAVE HAD A DISCUSSION BEFOREHAND.
BUT REALLY, THERE'S NOTHING IN OUR ORDINANCE AS IT RELATES TO THE AGENDA AND THOSE THINGS THAT REQUIRE THAT.
I'D JUST LIKE TO STRENGTHEN A LITTLE BIT JUST TO SAY, YES, WE MAY HAVE HAD DISCUSSIONS, WE MAY GIVE IT AN APPROVAL, BUT YOU NEVER KNOW.
JUST LIKE IN PLANNING AND ZONING OR THOSE TYPES OF THINGS WHERE WE DO HAVE READINGS.
IT JUST GIVES PEOPLE AN EXTRA COUPLE OF WEEKS.
MAYBE THEY HEARD ABOUT IT, THEY HAVE CONCERNS OR QUESTIONS BEFORE WE PUT THE FINAL I'S AND T'S ON THAT SAYING THIS IS APPROVED.
>> WOULD IT GO TO CONSENT ON THE SECOND?
THEORETICALLY, IT COULD BE ON CONSENT ON BOTH TIMES, IF FOR SOME REASON.
BUT I'M JUST SAYING, LOOKING AT IT, I DON'T THINK WHATEVER RESOLUTION, IT MAY NOT NEED TO BE ON AN ACTION ITEM, IT COULD BE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
BUT I THINK THEORETICALLY IT COULD APPROVE THERE.
I'M JUST SAYING SOMETIMES PEOPLE MAY PICK UP ON THINGS OR THEY MAY HEAR ABOUT THINGS, AND IT MAY BRING A CAUSE OF SAY, WAIT A MINUTE, MAYBE WE NEED TO GO LOOK AT THAT JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE.
THE STAFF HELPED PUT THIS TOGETHER.
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO IT, BUT THAT'S WHERE WE ARE ON THIS.
>> STAFF, WHAT'S YOUR RECOMMENDATION?
>> I THINK THE DRAFT RESOLUTION LOOKS GOOD, AND SO WE WORKED WITH COUNCILMAN SIMPSON TO PUT THIS TOGETHER.
AGAIN, IT DOES THAT VERY THING.
IT'S MEANT TO GIVE THE PEOPLE AN OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE RESOLUTIONS DO IMPACT THE CITIZENS, MOSTLY LIKE ORDINANCES DO.
A LOT OF THE RESOLUTIONS ARE ONES THAT ARE A SET POLICY BY THE COUNCIL.
MAYBE IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT THE CITIZENS HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR THAT BEFORE IT'S PASSED.
IT'S A VERY SIMPLE RESOLUTION WE HAVE PROPOSED.
AGAIN, IT JUST MARK IT AS FIRST READING, SECOND READING, WHETHER IT'S IN CONSENT, NON-CONSENT.
THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE ABILITY TO WAIVE THAT REQUIREMENT.
IF WE EVER DO HAVE A SITUATION WHERE WE DO NEED TO GET IT PASSED RIGHT AWAY AHEAD OF TIME, I CAN WORK ON THAT TO WHERE I PROPOSE THAT WE WOULD DO PASS IMMEDIATELY, BUT THOSE WOULD BE ON RARE EXCEPTIONS.
IT GIVES YOU THE FLEXIBILITY TO BE ABLE TO APPROVE QUICKLY IF YOU EVER NEEDED TO.
BUT THIS THING HERE, LOOK AT THE LIST THERE, WE HAVE VERY FEW OF THOSE THINGS ARE IMMEDIATE THAT COULDN'T GET DONE OVER FOUR WEEKS IF WE NEEDED TO.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THIS.
>> IS THIS A POLICY OR A PRACTICE? ARE WE JUST GOING TO DO THIS IN PRACTICE AND FUTURE COUNCIL THEN FOLLOW IT, THEY CHOOSE, OR IS THIS A POLICY CHANGE YOU'RE GOING TO IMPLEMENT THIS INTO THE POLICY OF COUNCIL?
[01:15:01]
>> THIS WOULD BE A RESOLUTION BY THE COUNCIL, SO IT WOULD STAND UNTIL OUR FUTURE COUNCIL RESCINDS THAT RESOLUTION.
WE WOULD FOLLOW IT INDEFINITELY.
>> I'M CURIOUS WHAT THAT RESOLUTION, HOW THAT WOULD READ.
WILL IT SPECIFICALLY NAME ALL OF THESE THINGS?
>> WE'VE GOT A DRAFT IN YOUR PACKET.
THIS IS ACTION 9 OF THE DAY, SO WE WANTED TO ENCOURAGE DISCUSSION.
THERE IS A DRAFT IN YOUR PACKET THAT YOU CAN LOOK AT, AND WE WILL TAKE ANY EDIT YOU HAVE FROM THERE.
>> IN A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH WITH THE TIME WE HAD ON THIS, THERE AREN'T MANY CITIES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS THAT DO SECOND READINGS OF RESOLUTIONS.
MY QUESTION IS, HOW WILL THAT AFFECT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE THROUGH THE RESOLUTION, BECAUSE WE'RE WAITING ANOTHER TWO WEEKS FOR A SECOND READING.
>> NOW, AGAIN, THE DISCUSSION ORIGINALLY, AND I CAN YIELD TO COUNCILMAN SIMPSON IN THIS TOO.
THE DISCUSSION REALLY STARTED OFF WAS EVERYTHING SHOULD BE SECOND READ.
WE IDENTIFIED THERE ARE SOME OPERATIONAL THINGS THAT WOULD SLOW US DOWN QUITE A BIT.
WE DO WANT TO TRY TO MOVE QUICKLY ON SOME CONTRACTS, AWARDING BIDS, AND SO FORTH.
WE WORKED OUR WAY PAST THOSE, AND WE WORK TOWARDS RESOLUTION.
RESOLUTIONS ARE POLICY-SETTING.
AGAIN, THERE'S ALWAYS THAT POTENTIAL THAT THIS COULD DELAY SOMETHING.
BUT CITY COUNCIL HAD THE ABILITY TO SAY, NO, WE CAN'T WAIT, LET'S GET IT DONE NOW. COUNCILMAN SIMPSON?
>> WHEN YOU LOOK AT OPEN RECORDS, THE PREMISE THAT WE START WITH IS ALL RECORDS ARE OPEN.
THEN YOU START TO MAKE EXCEPTIONS BECAUSE IT'S BETTER TO HAVE THAT.
WELL, IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T GET TOO FAR AHEAD OF THE PUBLIC OR MAKE SURE THE PUBLIC DOES HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY, BECAUSE TO ME, IN SOME INSTANCES, BEING PUBLIC ON FRIDAY AND MAKING A DECISION ON TUESDAY, I JUST THINK PEOPLE ARE NOT SITTING AND DYING BY WHAT WE DO, BUT OFTENTIMES THEY MAY FIND OUT ABOUT IT.
THAT'S WHY I LOOKED AT THE POTENTIAL OF DOING THIS WITHOUT NECESSARILY DOING EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, WHICH IS DRAGGING THINGS OR CAUSING THINGS TO DELAY OR TO BE HARMED.
RIGHT NOW, ANY BUDGETED ITEM OVER $50,000, WE APPROVE IN THE BUDGET EACH YEAR WHEN WE GO THROUGH THAT, BUT THAT'S APPROVED FOR A SECOND TIME WHEN WE GET INTO THAT.
THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE A CHECK AND BALANCE ON.
I THINK IT WAS JUST BEING ABLE TO BALANCE OUT, MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE GIVING AMPLE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO BE AWARE OF IT BEFORE IT'S STAMPED AND APPROVED WITHOUT NECESSARILY CAUSING ANY DEFICIENCY IN CITY SERVICES OR OPERATING THE CITY.
>> I THINK WHEN I FIRST READ IT, I WAS 50/50 ON IT, BUT I THINK WE HAVE TO ERROR ON THE SIDE OF THE PUBLIC AND WHAT THEY'RE AWARE OF AND THE KNOWLEDGE THEY GAINED BEFOREHAND.
I THINK THAT SHOULD ALWAYS BE A DRIVING FORCE, AND HOW TRANSPARENT WE REALLY ARE ON THINGS.
I THINK THAT THIS IS A GOOD STEP TOWARDS THAT.
>> AS GRAYSON SAID, WE CAN ALWAYS TAKE AN ITEM OFF AND SAY, NO, THERE'S AN EMERGENCY SITUATION WHERE IT DOESN'T NEED A SECOND READING.
AGAIN, BUT I JUST WOULD BRING THIS UP, AND OBVIOUSLY, YOU CAN LOOK AT THE RESOLUTION THAT'S BEEN DRAFTED, AND WE CAN TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND MAKE ANY SUGGESTIONS AND SEE WHAT YOU GUYS THINK AS FAR AS MOVING AHEAD ON THIS OR NOT.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? COUNCILMAN SIMPSON, WE APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION.
WE'LL JUST DIRECT STAFF TO BRING IT BACK ON THE NEXT MEETING.
ITEM 9E, AEDC UPDATE FROM OUR INTERIM, MR. DOUG NELSON.
[9.E. Amarillo Economic Development Corporation (AEDC) update from Interim CEO Doug Nelson]
THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE, DOUG.>> GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
HAVE A SHORT REPORT FOR YOU ALL, AND THEN I'M SURE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS.
>> MY REPORT, I'M GOING TO COVER A COUPLE OF THINGS, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, SOME PROJECT UPDATES, SOME OPERATIONAL UPDATES.
BUT I'M GOING TO START WITH BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS RETENTION EXPANSION.
WE DO HAVE OVER THE PAST QUARTER 11 INQUIRIES THAT WE HAVE RESPONDED TO WITH INFORMATION, AND ADDITIONAL EIGHT POTENTIAL PROJECTS THAT WE'RE ACTIVELY WORKING FOR DIRECT LEADS AND FOR GOVERNOR OFFICE LEADS.
[01:20:04]
THIS QUARTER, WE HAVE CONTINUED TO EXECUTE OUR PLAN OF WORK, ATTENDING AND PARTICIPATING IN THREE INDUSTRY TRADE SHOWS AND THREE SITE SELECTOR EVENTS.WE DO CONTINUE TO SEE AN INCREASE IN INQUIRIES AND LEADS.
I BELIEVE WE'VE TURNED THE CORNER AND CONTINUE TO EXPECT OUR DEAL FLOW TO KEEP IMPROVING.
EVERYTHING'S VERY POSITIVE IN THAT REGARD.
WE'RE SEEING ADDITIONAL DEAL FLOW.
THINGS ARE DEFINITELY IMPROVING.
YOU MAY REMEMBER SAGE OIL VAC.
WE DID A LOCATION INCENTIVE AGREEMENT WITH THEM.
THEY'RE BUILDING A 12 MILLION, IT'S GOING TO BE 12 MILLION PLUS, DOLLAR MANUFACTURING FACILITY, UP TO 60 JOBS.
IT'S IN OUR SOUTH GEORGIA BUSINESS PARK, AND THEY HAVE BROKEN GROUND AND ARE DOING DIRT WORK CURRENTLY.
YOU REMEMBER APPROVING THAT DEAL, THAT'S A $30 MILLION MANUFACTURING FACILITY.
THEY'RE IN OUR CENTER PORT BUSINESS PARK, AND THEY'RE GOING TO CREATE UP TO 60 JOBS.
THEY'VE BEEN UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR ABOUT THREE MONTHS NOW, THEY'RE POURING SLABS.
THEY'RE MAKING SOME REAL PROGRESS.
THEY HAVE FINISHED PHASE 2 OF THEIR FACILITY AND WAY BEFORE THEY WERE SCHEDULED TO FINISH PHASE 2.
IT'S A LITTLE OVER $20 MILLION DISTRIBUTION AND MANUFACTURING FACILITY.
IT IS IN OUR SOUTH GEORGIA BUSINESS PARK, AND THEY WILL CREATE UP TO 65 JOBS.
THOSE ARE THE PROJECTS THAT ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW.
WE EXPECT TO ALSO TRANSACT WITH A COLD STORAGE FACILITY THAT YOU ALL APPROVED A WHILE BACK, WE EXPECT THAT LAND TRANSACTION TO OCCUR WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS, AND THAT'LL BE EXCITING, 100,000 SQUARE FOOT IN CENTER PORT BUSINESS PARK.
I ALSO WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW ABOUT A COUPLE OF RECOGNITIONS THAT OUR COMMUNITY HAS HAD RECENTLY.
AMARILLO WAS RANKED AS THE NUMBER 1 MID-SIZED METRO AREA EXPECTED TO SUSTAIN THE MOST ECONOMIC GROWTH IN 2025.
THE SOURCE OF THAT WAS THE KENAN INSTITUTE OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE.
IT'S A FASCINATING REPORT TO BE HONEST.
YOU CAN GO IN AND YOU CAN COMPARE CITIES AND LOOK AT A COMMUNITY'S GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT.
BECAUSE OUR COMMUNITY HAS FOCUSED ON PRIMARY JOBS, PRIMARY JOB CREATION, PRIMARY EMPLOYERS, A LOT OF MANUFACTURING.
THAT IS WHY WE RANKED SO HIGH IN GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, IS BECAUSE OF THE FOCUS THAT WE PLACED ON THOSE PRIMARY EMPLOYERS.
THAT'S A NICE FEATHER IN OUR CAP AS A COMMUNITY.
THE SECOND ONE IS BUSINESS FACILITIES, THEIR 2025 ANNUAL RANKINGS REPORT.
THE CATEGORY WAS MOST AFFORDABLE COST OF LIVING, OVER 100,000 POPULATION, AND AMARILLO RANKED NUMBER 2 AS MOST AFFORDABLE.
THIS IS UP FROM NUMBER 7 IN LAST YEAR'S REPORT.
OUR COST OF LIVING CONTINUES TO BE VERY AFFORDABLE, WHICH IS ATTRACTIVE TO INDUSTRY.
>> THE FINAL THING I WANT TO COVER WITH Y'ALL OPERATIONALLY.
WE'RE IN GOOD SHAPE FROM AN OPERATION STANDPOINT.
I KNOW THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME DISCUSSION TODAY ABOUT ADDING A BOARD MEMBER TO OUR BOARD.
WE CURRENTLY SIT AT FOUR OUT OF FIVE.
IN OUR AUGUST BOARD MEETING, IF A NEW BOARD MEMBER IS PLACED BEFORE OUR AUGUST BOARD MEETING, IN OUR AUGUST BOARD MEETING, WE WILL ELECT OFFICERS.
WE WILL ALSO BE DISCUSSING THE ISSUANCE OF
[01:25:04]
THE RFP FOR FINDING A SEARCH FIRM FOR OUR NEXT EXECUTIVE.THE BOARD WILL ALSO DISCUSS THE PROCESS FOR THE RECRUITMENT OF THIS NEW PERSON.
THAT CAN INCLUDE AND CAN LOOK A MULTITUDE OF WAYS.
BUT OUR BOARD WILL BE DISCUSSING HOW THEY PLAN TO PROCEED ALONG THOSE LINES.
WE'LL ALSO BE UNDERTAKING BUDGET DISCUSSIONS.
AS YOU'RE WELL AWARE, BUDGET SEASON IS UPON US, AND WE'LL BE LOOKING HARD AT THAT.
THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAVE TODAY AS FAR AS A QUARTERLY UPDATE.
I'M CERTAINLY HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> TO GOOD QUESTIONS, COUNCIL? YES, SIR.
BECAUSE I WANT TO FOLLOW UP ON SOME INFORMATION THAT HAD BEEN GIVEN BEFORE COUNCIL BEFORE, BUT WHEN WE'RE EVALUATING WHETHER TO SUPPORT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, IS THE COST PER JOB METRIC THAT IS DIVIDING THE INCENTIVE BY THE AMOUNT OF JOBS CREATED? IS THAT THE ONLY FACTOR THAT WE CONSIDER, ARE THERE OTHER THINGS THAT WE CONSIDER? IF SO, WHAT ARE THE THINGS DO WE CONSIDER OTHER THAN JUST THAT METRIC?
>> SURE. THE COST PER JOB, OF COURSE, IS AN EASY METRIC TO COME UP WITH.
BUT CERTAINLY ALL OF THE PROJECTS WE DO IMPACT OUR COMMUNITY IN A MULTITUDE OF WAYS.
I THINK THAT'D BE A NARROWLY FOCUSED WAY OF LOOKING AT IT.
CERTAINLY, WE WANT TO LOOK AT THE FULL PICTURE.
WE WANT TO LOOK AT THE CAPITAL INVESTMENT.
WE WANT TO LOOK AT WHETHER OR NOT THAT COMPANY IS REQUESTING A TAX ABATEMENT.
WE WANT TO LOOK AT THEIR WAGE LEVEL, THAT IMPACTS THE LOCAL SPEND IN OUR COMMUNITY, WE REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT WHAT IT DOES FOR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS HERE LOCALLY.
I THINK YOU REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT THE FULL PICTURE WHEN YOU'RE DECIDING UPON WHETHER OR NOT TO SUPPORT A PARTICULAR PROJECT.
>> THEN THAT'S GENERALLY WHAT WE DO.
I MEAN, WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT ALL THE FACTORS THAT MAY COME INTO PLAY.
FOR EXAMPLE, EVERYBODY KNOWS THERE'S A PROJECT THAT COULD COME FOR BELL, BUT THIS MAY MEAN THERE MAY BE OTHER COMPANIES THAT COULD COME HERE TANGENT WITH THAT.
THERE'S LOTS OF OPPORTUNITIES OTHER THAN JUST WHAT THAT CREATES AT BELL.
IT'S THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPIN OFF OTHER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AS WELL.
>> ABSOLUTELY. IN THE FIRST BELL FACILITY THAT WE SUPPORTED AS A COMMUNITY, THAT PARTICULAR AIRCRAFT WAS A VERY SLOW RATE OF PRODUCTION TYPE AIRCRAFT.
THEY'RE BUILDING, MOST YEARS, MAYBE 25 OF THOSE.
WITH THIS NEW MV75, WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IN THE FUTURE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TRIPLE THAT AMOUNT PER YEAR OR MORE.
BECAUSE OF THE RATE OF PRODUCTION, THEIR SUPPLIERS, THEIR PARTNERS, WILL HOPEFULLY NEED LOTS OF SPACE IN OUR COMMUNITY.
THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY WITH THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT TO BRING PARTNERS OF BELLS TO OUR COMMUNITY FOR THEM TO SET UP SHOPS AND SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE MV75.
>> ANOTHER QUESTION I WANT TO ASK.
THERE'S BEEN SOME PUBLIC COMMENTS SUGGESTING THAT SOMETIMES AND I'M JUST REPEATING WHAT I HEAR, WE'RE GIVING AWAY THE FARM.
WE'RE BEING TOO BUSINESS FRIENDLY.
WE'RE NOT NEGOTIATING HARD ENOUGH.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS AND WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO TO BE COMPETITIVE?
>> SURE. I WOULD DISAGREE WITH THAT SENTIMENT THAT WE'RE GIVING AWAY THE FARM.
CERTAINLY, THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL, JUST NOT TOO TERRIBLY LONG AGO, REVISED OUR INCENTIVE POLICIES.
WE ACTUALLY PULLED BACK THE STANDARD FOR WHICH A COMPANY THAT'S LOOKING AT OUR COMMUNITY.
THEY'RE LOOKING AT THESE CRITERIA AND LOOKING AT WHAT THEY MIGHT ACHIEVE AS FAR AS INCENTIVES GO.
OUR STANDARD ANSWER FOR THAT HAS BEEN PULLED BACK.
WE DON'T GIVE AWAY THE FARM, SO TO SPEAK.
IT'S A MUCH LESS OR MUCH REDUCED INCENTIVE THAN WHAT WE COULD DO.
NOW, OBVIOUSLY, THESE INCENTIVE POLICIES THAT ARE IN PLACE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR COUNCIL TO GO OVER AND ABOVE WHAT THE POLICY IS.
[01:30:06]
THERE MAY BE SOME EXTRAORDINARY BENEFIT FOR A PARTICULAR COMPANY TO COME TO OUR COMMUNITY, AND ALL MIGHT DECIDE AS A BODY TO GIVE THEM MORE THAN WHAT THE GUIDELINES PRESCRIBE.BUT CERTAINLY, WE ARE GIVING COMPANIES GOOD INFORMATION UP FRONT.
THEY HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT TO EXPECT.
ALL OF OUR TAXING JURISDICTION PARTNERS, BESIDES THE CITY OF AMARILLO, ALSO KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT.
THE WHOLE POINT OF HAVING THOSE GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA IS THAT OUR COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE, ACROSS ALL OF THE TAXING JURISDICTIONS, COULD MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THOSE INCENTIVES WILL LOOK LIKE FOR COMPANIES.
>> THEN WHEN YOU LOOK AT OUR COMPETITORS, HOW WOULD YOU RANK OUR INCENTIVES VERSUS THOSE THAT WE'RE COMPETING AGAINST?
>> SURE. I WOULD SAY WE'RE VERY COMPETITIVE ON A COST PER JOB.
WE'RE LESS COMPETITIVE ON OUR TAX ABATEMENT, IN SOME CASES, LESS COMPETITIVE, IN SOME CASES, WE'RE MORE COMPETITIVE.
THERE ARE COMMUNITIES OUT THERE WHERE THE COUNTY IN WHICH THAT COMMUNITY IS LOCATED, THE COUNTY IS AGAINST TAX ABATEMENTS ALTOGETHER.
THAT IS A DIFFICULT HILL FOR THAT COMMUNITY TO CLIMB BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ALL THEIR PARTNERS TOGETHER MOVING FORWARD.
OUR COMMUNITY IS NOT LIKE THAT.
WE'RE PRETTY MUCH ALL ON THE SAME PAGE AS FAR AS THESE GUIDELINES GO.
BUT OUR COST PER JOB INCENTIVE, I WOULD SAY IS VERY COMPETITIVE.
WE'RE CERTAINLY NOT THE HIGHEST IN THE STATE, BUT WE'RE VERY COMPETITIVE.
>> THEN, WHEN YOU AND I HAD A CONVERSATION, I ASKED YOU, WHAT IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS WHEN IT COMES TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT? I THINK YOUR RESPONSE WAS CONSISTENCY AND STABILITY IS SOMETHING TO BE EFFECTIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
MY QUESTION IS EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT AND MORE SPECIFICALLY, HOW CAN A COUNCIL, ADC BOARD, OUR STAFFS, WHAT CAN WE DO TO PROMOTE THAT CONSISTENCY AND STABILITY?
>> SURE. UNFORTUNATELY, OUR ORGANIZATION HAS HAD SOME INSTABILITY OVER THE PAST YEAR OR SO.
WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD ABSOLUTELY TO THE FUTURE WHERE WE FEEL WE'VE GOT A MUCH BETTER PLATFORM BY WHICH TO PROMOTE OUR COMMUNITY.
BUT YES, CONSISTENCY AND STABILITY ARE VERY IMPORTANT.
THE COMPANIES THAT ARE LOOKING AT OUR COMMUNITY IN SOME CASES TO RELOCATE, IN SOME CASES TO EXPAND TO OUR COMMUNITY, WHETHER THEY'RE DOING IT THEMSELVES OR THEY'VE HIRED A SITE SELECTOR.
THEY ARE PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT OUR COMMUNITY DOES.
HOW OUR COMMUNITY LOOKS IN THE PRESS, HOW WE INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER, HOW WE INTERACT WITH THE COMPANY ITSELF.
THE FACT THAT WE HAVE, LIKE I SAID, THESE GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA, THAT MAKES OUR INCENTIVES VERY CONSISTENT ACROSS THE BOARD UNLESS THERE'S SOME EXTRAORDINARY ITEM.
THEN FROM A PRESS STANDPOINT, IT IS CERTAINLY STABILITY SALES.
COMPANIES DO NOT LIKE UNCERTAINTY OR INCONSISTENCIES, THOSE THINGS ARE NOT ATTRACTIVE AS A COMMUNITY WHEN YOU'RE TRYING TO ATTRACT OUTSIDE BUSINESS.
THAT'S WHAT I MEANT WHEN I SAID THAT CONSISTENT AND STABLE ENVIRONMENT.
>> THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN. YES, SIR.
>> I'VE GOT A QUESTION. WHEN WE SPOKE ABOUT A MONTH AGO, I ASKED YOU SPECIFICALLY IF THE DEAL FLOW WAS LESS THAN NORMAL.
I BELIEVE YOU SAID IT WAS, BUT NOW I'M HEARING TODAY THAT IT IS VERY STRONG AND VERY ROBUST.
[OVERLAPPING] WHEN YOU TELL ME THE DEFICIENCY. I MISS.
>> LET ME TALK TO YOU ABOUT THAT BECAUSE I THINK YOU MAY HAVE MISINTERPRETED ONE OF THE THINGS I SAID.
BUT THE REALITY IS IS THAT WE'VE GONE THROUGH A PERIOD OF TIME WHERE OUR DEAL FLOW WAS MUCH LESS.
>> WOULD THAT BE THE INSTABILITY?
[01:35:01]
IT IS AN INDICATOR OF THAT?NOW I CAN'T I CAN'T JUDGE THAT TOTALLY.
THINGS, GLOBAL ECONOMICS CAN IMPACT THAT.
JUST WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE STATE CAN IMPACT THAT.
BUT FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, CERTAINLY THAT DID IMPACT OUR DEAL FLOW.
I WOULD SAY THAT DECEMBER, JANUARY, MARCH, IT WAS PRETTY SLOW.
>> CAN YOU CLARIFY SLOW? NONE OR SLOW.
WHEN WE'RE WORKING, IN THE PAST QUARTER, WE'VE RESPONDED TO 11.
WE'LL CALL THAT 20 PROJECTS WE'RE WORKING AT THE HEIGHT OF MY 15 YEARS WITH THE ORGANIZATION, WE WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE LIKE 30 OR 40 IN A QUARTER.
WE'RE ABOUT, WE'VE CLIMBED BACK UP TO ABOUT HALF OF WHAT I THINK IS THE CAPACITY FOR OUR ORGANIZATION, BECAUSE WHEN WE WERE FIELDING THAT MANY INQUIRIES, WE WERE STRETCHED TO THE LIMIT.
[LAUGHTER] IT WAS ALL WE COULD DO TO KEEP IN FRONT OF THAT MANY INQUIRIES.
I WOULD SAY WE'VE CLIMBED BACK TO ABOUT HALF AND I THINK IT'S STILL IMPROVING.
WE WENT THROUGH A SLOW PERIOD.
>> HOW MANY ADCS ARE WE COMPETING AGAINST JUST IN TEXAS ALONE?
>> OH, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
ABOUT HALF OF THEM ARE BS, AND ABOUT HALF OF THEM ARE AS.
>> WITHOUT A STABLE, ROBUST ADC, WE'RE REALLY GOING TO BE CHALLENGED TO BRING THESE BUSINESSES IN, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> YES, I WOULD SAY THAT IS CORRECT.
WE WANT TO BE AS PRODUCTIVE AS POSSIBLE.
WE'RE DOING OUR DARNEDEST TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN RIGHT NOW.
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT. THANK YOU FOR MAKING IT HAPPEN.
>> NO, IT'S JUST GOOD TO HEAR, THAT THE WELL IS NOT DRY.
WHEN I THINK, LIKE YOU SAID, THE STABILITY IS HELPING.
I THINK AS WE APPOINT THIS NEXT MEMBER AND ALL CAN GET, YOUR APPOINTMENTS DONE.
JUST GOOD TO HEAR BECAUSE WE HEAR SO MUCH OUT IN THE COMMUNITY AND NOBODY REALLY KNOWS, EXCEPT FOR YOU GUYS.
IT'S REALLY GOOD TO HEAR THAT IT'S NOT DRY.
AGAIN, LIKE YOU SAID, THERE'S SOME OTHER IMPACTS THAT COULD AFFECT THE DEALS THAT ARE BEING DONE, WHETHER IT'S GLOBAL ECONOMICS OR WHATEVER.
I APPRECIATE YOU TAKING THE TIME TO BRING THAT TO US.
>> WHAT I'M HEARING YOU SAY IS, IT'S IMPORTANT OUR NEXT MOVES.
BECAUSE WE NEED TO BRING STABILITY TO THE ADC.
>> YES, SIR. I THINK WE'RE THERE.
FRANKLY, I THINK WHOEVER GETS APPOINTED AT THIS NEXT APPOINTMENT? CERTAINLY. IT'S ALWAYS IMPORTANT.
IT'S LEADING AN ORGANIZATION 105 THAT LEADS.
THEY'RE GIVING US DIRECTION AS TO WHAT OUR TARGET INDUSTRIES ARE, WHAT EVENTS THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE US.
WE'RE CARRYING THE AMARILLO TEXAS BRAND ACROSS THE UNITED STATES.
WE WANT THE SUPPORT OF OUR BOARD.
WE WANT THE SUPPORT OF OUR CITY COUNCIL FOR US TO GO DO THAT ROBUSTLY.
I THINK IS A GOOD WORD. ALL THESE APPOINTMENTS ARE IMPORTANT, BUT I THINK WE'VE TURNED THE CORNER FRANKLY AND THINGS ARE LOOKING UP.
>> NOW I'M GOING TO ASK THE NOVICE QUESTION. BEAR WITH ME.
IT'S A FOLLOW UP TO WHAT YOU ASKED.
WHAT DOES AMARILLO LOOK LIKE WITHOUT AN ADC.
>> I AM PROBABLY NOT QUALIFIED TO ANSWER THAT.
BUT PERRYMAN DID A REPORT PROBABLY 12 YEARS AGO, AND HE SAID ABOUT 48% OF THE JOBS IN OUR COMMUNITY WERE SOMEHOW TIED TO A PROJECT THAT THE ORGANIZATION AND THE CITY OF AMARILLO HAD DONE.
WITHOUT THE ORGANIZATION, I THINK WE'RE LOOKING AT A VERY DIFFERENT COMMUNITY.
[01:40:07]
>> GOOD COMMENTS. MR. NELSON, LET ME SAY CONSISTENCY AND STABILITY, I THINK, IS WHAT YOU'VE BROUGHT.
I APPRECIATE YOUR LEADERSHIP OVER THERE.
WE KNOW IT WAS A WASHING MACHINE OF TURMOIL AND ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT NONE OF US WANTED TO WALK THROUGH EITHER.
BUT I THINK BECAUSE OF THE PROFESSIONALISM THAT YOU AND YOUR STAFF STEPPED UP TO, YOUR WILLINGNESS TO WORK WITH PREVIOUS COUNCIL, AS WELL AS NEW BOARD MEMBERS.
I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE'RE SEEING IS GOOD LEADERSHIP THAT WORKS FOR THE OVERALL BETTERMENT OF THE COMMUNITY.
WHEN WE HAVE A DIRECT QUESTION LIKE THIS, WHAT WOULD AMARILLO LOOK LIKE WITHOUT OUR EDC? WE COULD ARGUE WHETHER IT'S 20% OR 48% OR WHATEVER THE DERIVATIVE IS THAT CONTRIBUTES TO THESE NEW JOBS THAT WE'RE ATTRACTING, AND AMARILLO LOOKS REALLY GOOD.
WE'VE PUT A LOT OF GOOD SEED IN THE GROUND IN THIS AGRARIAN SOCIETY OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE COME UP THIS YEAR AND HARVEST FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL.
BUT LET ME JUST TELL YOU WHAT AMARILLO WOULD LOOK LIKE WITHOUT THE EDC.
IT WOULD LOOK LIKE TAXES BEING COLLECTED AND PAID FOR OVER A DECADE TO PAY PROMISES THAT WE'RE GOING TO KEEP WHILE YOU'RE CLOSING DOWN THE EDC.
THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT FOR US TO REMEMBER.
WE MADE A COMMITMENT TO THIS; WE SEE THE BENEFIT FROM IT.
WE WANT TO HAVE A BUSINESS MINDSET AND A GOOD PLAN.
BUT THEN WE NEED THE EDC, AND YOU SAW PREVIOUS COUNCIL TAKE IT FROM, LET'S SAY, IF YOU WERE THE GUY WHO SAID GIVING AWAY THE FARM, WELL, WHAT DID THAT LOOK LIKE? WELL, THAT WAS 10 YEARS OF 100% TAX ABATEMENT.
IF YOU'RE THAT GUY, THAT WAS YOUR CRITICISM.
WELL, WHAT ARE WE DOING NOW? WE'RE DOING A DESCENDING CHART.
WE SEE OUR COMMUNITIES START REAPING THE BENEFITS OF THOSE GOOD ENTITIES THAT ARE COMING IN, AND WE'RE STILL ATTRACTING THOSE HIGH-QUALITY, TOP-PRODUCING, MANUFACTURING COMPANIES AND VENTURES, AND BUSINESS.
NOW, ONE OF OUR ABSOLUTE BEST STAKEHOLDERS THAT WE LOVE EVERYTHING THAT THEY REPRESENT, AND WHAT WE GET TO DO WITH THEM IS BELL HELICOPTER.
THEY HAVE A REALLY GOOD CONTRACT IN FRONT OF THEM, AND I THINK WE COULD PROJECT TO 2050 FOR A SOLID OUTPUT OF EVERYTHING THAT THEY CAN PRODUCE.
WE WANT THEM TO KNOW THAT CONSISTENCY AND THE STABILITY IS IN COMPANIES LIKE BELL HELICOPTER.
THAT'S WHO WE WANT TO PARTNER WITH.
THAT'S WHO WE WANT TO DRIVE TOWARDS.
THE INCENTIVES THAT WE HAVE PROPOSED HERE TODAY FOR THE COATINGS COMPANY AND MORE AEROSPACE AND THOSE TYPES OF JOBS.
THOSE ARE THE TYPES OF COMPANIES THAT WE'RE GOING TO PROMOTE.
THIS COUNCIL IS SUPPORTIVE BECAUSE WE SEE GOOD LEADERSHIP IN YOU, AND WE APPRECIATE THAT.
WE KNOW YOU'RE NOT JUST THE INTERIM DIRECTOR.
YOUR CORE OF THAT TEAM, AND YOU'LL CONTINUE TO KEEP THAT TEAM EVEN WHEN YOU HIRE A NEW DIRECTOR AND YOU ONBOARD HIM OR HER.
IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT TO REALIZE WE'VE MADE COMMITMENTS THAT YOU'RE JUST GOING TO PAY DEBT FOR 10 YEARS BECAUSE YOU WANT TO HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT, LIKE, WE DON'T WANT THIS ANYMORE.
THAT'S ILLOGICAL. NOW,MAYBE YOU'RE LIKE ME AND YOU SAW THAT THE EDC NEEDED TO BE TWEAKED A LITTLE BIT, LIKE ANY BUSINESS, AND I THINK THAT'S GOOD.
WE ALWAYS NEED TO BE CRITICAL OF OUR PERFORMANCE AND CRITICAL OF WHAT CAN WE DO BETTER.
HOW DO WE GET BETTER AT THIS JOB? THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.
THE POLITICS THAT'S AT PLAY IN ALL OF THAT IS WHERE THE WASHING MACHINE STARTS TURNING THINGS AROUND.
MAN, WE'RE GROWING. THINGS ARE COMING UP.
AMARILLO IS SET UP FOR SUCCESS AFTER SUCCESS, MOVING FORWARD.
WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK.
WE THANK YOU FOR THE APPOINTMENT.
THEN THANK YOU FOR STANDING THERE AND LETTING ME PAT YOU ON THE BACK A LITTLE BIT, BUT I WOULDN'T SAY IT IF I DIDN'T MEAN IT.
YOU'VE SEEN US SIT ON THIS SIDE OF THE DIAS AND BE VERY CRITICAL.
I THINK YOU KNOW WE MEAN WHAT WE SAY. THANK YOU.
>> I APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE.
>> MAYOR, CAN I ADD ONE THING TO THAT? THE THING THAT RESONATED WITH ME THAT YOU SAID WAS ABOUT THE UNCERTAINTY.
TO ME, WHETHER YOU'RE LOOKING TO INVEST IN THE STOCK MARKET OR COMMUNITY, UNCERTAINTY IS THE ENEMY OF INVESTMENT.
PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO INVEST IN THAT, SO THAT REALLY RESONATED WITH ME.
YOU MENTIONED WE'VE HAD A LITTLE BIT OF WATERS GOING UP AND DOWN FOR THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS, AND THAT'S THERE, THAT'S DONE. WE'RE MOVING FORWARD.
[01:45:01]
BUT MY HOPE IS THAT THIS COUNCIL AND FUTURE COUNCILS WILL APPROACH THIS WORK THAT WE HAVE TO DO WITH STEADY HANDS, CLEAR PRIORITIES, AND A LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE.WE OWE IT TO THE PEOPLE WE SERVE AND TO THOSE CONSIDERING INVESTING IN OUR CITY TO KEEP THE CHAOS TO A MINIMUM AND THE CONFIDENCE AND CREDIBILITY HIGH, AND I KNOW THAT'S THE DIRECTION THAT WE'RE GOING TO HEAD NOW.
I APPRECIATE YOUR REMARKS TODAY AND THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MR. NELSON. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THAT ACCOMPLISHES 9.E.
I'M GOING TO HOLD US JUST A LITTLE BIT FURTHER HERE BEFORE WE TAKE A RECESS.
[9.F. Appointment to fill vacancy on Amarillo Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors ]
WE'RE LOOKING AT FILLING A VACANCY HERE ON THE EDC.I'LL START THE CONVERSATION BY BEING VERY COMPLIMENTARY AND DOING A RECAP TO MR. FAIRLY. ALEX FAIRLY IS A CONTRIBUTOR TO SEVERAL CAMPAIGNS.
I'M NOT GOING TO TELL YOU HE'S NOT POLITICAL.
I AM GOING TO TELL YOU HE'S A HARD WORKER, AND THAT HE'S GOT A LOT OF FRUIT ON THAT TREE.
YOU CAN LOVE HIM OR HATE HIM, BUT YOU CAN'T DENY THE GOOD THAT HE DOES FOR THE COMMUNITY.
I DON'T SEE TOO MANY OTHER PEOPLE OUT THERE DOING THE THINGS THAT I'VE SEEN HIM DO.
ANECDOTALLY, PERSONALLY, I CAN ATTEST TO THAT.
NOW, SAYING THAT, I APPRECIATE THAT HE TOOK MY PHONE CALL.
HE ACTUALLY CALLED ME AND SAID, NO, AFTER WE HAD OUR MEETING.
THEN WHEN I TALKED HIM THROUGH IT, HE SAID, I CAN DO IT, BUT JUST FOR A SHORT TIME.
BUT HE STEPPED UP WHEN WE HAD A MASS EXODUS OFF OF THE EDC BOARD, AND IT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, INSTABILITY AND ALL THE THINGS THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK AND REHASH.
BUT WHAT WE ARE SAYING HERE IS HE IS STEPPING DOWN, AND I APPRECIATE HIM.
HE HAD A CERTAIN SKILL SET AND WILL BE VALUABLE TO THIS COMMUNITY OFF OF THE EDC BOARD.
THERE ARE PHONE CALLS THAT HE CAN MAKE THAT, QUITE FRANKLY, SOME OF US CAN'T MAKE, AND SO WE NEED HIM.
WE DON'T NECESSARILY NEED HIM IN THAT ROLE, BUT WE NEED HIM TO BE HIM, AND THEN WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD.
COUNCILMAN SIMPSON, I LOVE THAT YOU JUST SET THE STANDARD, AND YOU SET IT VERY HIGH.
I WANT TO COMPLIMENT MR. FAIRLY, AS I DO ANYONE WHO'S WILLING TO GET OUT HERE AND DO THE HARD WORK IN PUBLIC AND LET EVERYBODY THROW ROCKS AT YOU.
I WOULD LIKE TO CAUTION THE PEOPLE THAT WE'RE FIXING TO NOMINATE.
YOU ARE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO GET OUT HERE AND DO THE HARD WORK, AND SOME PEOPLE ARE GOING TO THROW ROCKS AT YOU.
IT'S NOT GOING TO BE FAIR, AND SOME OF IT WON'T EVEN BE HONEST OR GENUINE.
BUT IT IS THE WORK THAT WE NEED TO DO.
THEN YOU'RE IN A CONTROVERSIAL POSITION.
THE BOARD MEMBERS THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE OVER THERE, EDCS, ARE CONTROVERSIAL.
THEY'RE HOT TOPICS IN EVERY COMMUNITY.
ANYTIME YOU'RE TAKING SOMEBODY'S SALES TAX MONEY OR SOMEBODY'S PROPERTY TAX MONEY, AND YOU ARE TRYING TO USE THOSE AS AN INCENTIVE TO INCREASE AN ECONOMIC IMPACT, YOU ARE SETTING YOURSELF UP FOR CRITICISM SOMEWHERE.
WE WANT TO HIT 350, 400, AND MAN, WE'RE DOING IT, AND WE NEED ANOTHER GUY THAT CAN PUT HIS NAME OR ANOTHER LADY THAT CAN PUT HER NAME ON THE ROSTER.
THE REASON FOR HAVING THIS DISCUSSION HERE IS IS WE NEED TO SEE WHERE COUNCIL IS, AND I'D LIKE TO MOVE THIS FORWARD IN TWO WEEKS.
I'D LOVE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION TODAY.
COME UP WITH SOME GOOD NAMES OF PEOPLE THAT WE THINK ARE QUALIFIED AND BENEFICIAL.
YOU HAVE A LIST BEFORE YOU OF PEOPLE THAT ARE STILL WILLING TO SERVE.
THEN TWO WEEKS FROM NOW, I'D LOVE TO BE ABLE TO PUT IT BACK ON THE AGENDA TO DO A NOMINATION, AND A SECOND, AND THEN WE'LL FILL THAT POSITION.
IT GOES RIGHT IN LINE WITH MR. NELSON'S TIMELINE.
HE NEEDS THAT PERSON THERE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER SO THAT HE CAN GET THOSE PEOPLE ONBOARDED, GET EVERYBODY TO A PLACE WHERE THEY KNOW WHAT THEY WANT IN A DIRECTOR, AND THEY CAN COMMUNICATE AS ONE BODY WITH SOME UNANIMITY TO A SEARCH FIRM.
THESE ARE OUR EXPECTATIONS, AND THIS IS HOW MUCH TIME YOU HAVE TO DELIVER.
THAT'S BEING STRATEGIC, AND IT STARTS WITH US HERE, SO WE NEED GOOD LEADERSHIP UP HERE.
I WOULD OPEN THE CONVERSATION UP FOR ANY COUNCIL MEMBER THAT WOULD LIKE TO PERHAPS GIVE 2, 03, 4 NAMES OF PEOPLE THAT YOU'RE LEANING TOWARDS OR THE TYPE OF PERSON THAT YOU THINK NEEDS TO FULFILL THAT ROLE.
I WILL JUST LEAVE IT IN THE PLACE WHERE I LEFT IT LAST TIME.
THE BANKING POSITION, THE LENDER POSITION, THE FINANCIAL POSITION, IN MY ESTIMATION, IS ONE THAT PROBABLY NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED.
I THINK IT'S REALLY GOOD TO HAVE A PERSON THAT DOES THAT FOR A LIVING.
THEY KNOW HOW TO READ FINANCIALS, THEY KNOW HOW TO LOOK AT BUSINESSES, ENGAGE.
WHAT IS THE RISK RATIO? HOW HEALTHY IS THIS ENTITY? WHAT'S THE GREATEST LIKELIHOOD FOR THEIR SUCCESS HERE?
[01:50:02]
THAT IS A TYPE OF PERSON THAT I WOULD LIKE TO LOOK TOWARD AND LOOK FOR.THE OTHER TYPE OF PERSON THAT I'D LIKE TO LOOK TOWARD IS I LIKE CONTRACTORS.
WE'RE SOME OF THE HARDEST-NOSED DEAL MAKERS, AND WE DIG THROUGH THINGS.
WE SIGN THE FRONT OF CHECKS, NOT THE BACK OF CHECKS.
WE UNDERSTAND HOW HARD IT IS TO MAKE THINGS WORK WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE WHAT YOU NEED.
YOU'RE A CONSTANT PROBLEM SOLVER.
IF WE DON'T WANT THAT TYPICAL BANKER WHO LOVES THE BOX, THEN I'D LOVE TO HAVE THAT GUY WHO UNDERSTANDS HOW TO MAKE SOMETHING WORK OUTSIDE OF THE BOX.
I'LL LEAVE IT THERE AND ASK ANY COUNCIL MEMBER TO GO AHEAD AND JUMP IN.
>> MAYOR, REAL QUICK, BEFORE YOU START THAT, JUST FYI, THIS POSITION IS UP IN DECEMBER.
IT COULD BE A SHORT TIME UNLESS YOU WERE TO RENEW THEM AT THAT POINT.
THIS PERSON WOULD BE FILLING ALEX FAIRLY'S UNEXPIRED TERM, WHICH IS UP IN DECEMBER.
>> I APPRECIATE THAT. I WOULD SAY, THOUGH, WITH CAUTION.
I WOULD HATE TO SEE COUNCIL NOMINATE SOMEBODY AND ASK THEM TO GO AND SERVE IN THIS CAPACITY, WITH ALL OF THE LEARNING AND THE LEARNING CURVE AND THE ONBOARDING, WITH ANYTHING LESS THAN OUR CONFIDENCE OF IF WE APPOINT YOU AND WE VOTE FOR YOU, WE SHOULD BE WILLING TO STAND BEHIND YOU COME DECEMBER, AND I WOULD SPEAK THE SAME WAY TO OUR EXISTING BOARD MEMBERS.
YOU NEED CONSISTENCY, YOU NEED STABILITY, THEN YOU NEED TO HAVE THE CONFIDENCE OF KNOWING THAT YOU CAN GO OUT THERE AND MAKE THOSE DECISIONS AND LEAD AND BE SUPPORTED.
I APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THAT UP, AND I WOULD HOPE THAT WE CAN LOOK AT THIS AS A PLACEMENT HERE TODAY, KNOWING WHERE WE'RE GOING TO BE IN DECEMBER.
>> MAYOR, CAN I MENTION ONE OTHER LOGISTICAL THING? I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THE FOUR TIMES A YEAR WHERE OUR NEXT MEETING IS THREE WEEKS AWAY, NOT TWO WEEKS AWAY.
I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE NEXT EDC MEETING WILL BE OR WHEN IT'S PLANNED, SO IT'S GOING TO BE THREE WEEKS BEFORE I THINK WE MEET BACK ON COUNCIL AGAIN, BUT WE ARE, OF COURSE, MEETING TO HAVE SOME BUDGET DISCUSSIONS.
IN TERMS OF LOGISTICS, AS DOUG SAID, WHENEVER THEIR MEETING IS, HOPEFULLY HAVING THAT POSITION FILLED, I DON'T KNOW WHETHER THAT TIMETABLE MAY COME INTO PLAY.
>> I DO KNOW THAT THAT IS A LOGISTIC, AND I AM TRYING TO MOVE US ALONG.
I EXPECTED THE BUDGET WORKSHOP TO BE SEVERAL DAYS ON MY CALENDAR, AND SO RIGHT NOW, WE'RE TRYING TO APPROACH THAT WITH A LITTLE SHORTER TIME FRAME WITH A FOLLOW-UP MEETING.
IT MAY ALLOW FOR A FRIDAY OPPORTUNITY IF WE WANTED TO CALL A SPECIAL SESSION.
I THINK WE DEFINITELY COULD LOOK AT THAT.
I WILL LEAVE THAT IN THE HANDS OF COUNCIL.
IF YOU GUYS HAVE SOME PEOPLE THAT YOU'RE COMFORTABLE WITH AND YOU WANT TO GET THIS DONE, THEN WE COULD DEFINITELY PUT IT UP THERE ON THE 8TH, I BELIEVE.
>> I DON'T KNOW IF DOUG IS STILL HERE.
WHEN IS THE AEDC'S AUGUST MEETING?
>> WE ARE CURRENTLY SITTING THE SAME DAY AS THE COUNCIL MEETING.
>> I HEAR YOUR CAUTION, AND I THINK IT'S GOOD LEADERSHIP IN LOOKING AHEAD.
IF WE KNOW WHERE WE'RE GOING ON THE 12TH, CAN WE GET THERE ON THE 8TH? WE'RE GOING TO BE TOGETHER ANYWAY ON THE 6TH AND THE 7TH.
YOU KNOW HOW BUDGET WORKSHOP GOES.
YOU CAN'T PUT IT AT THE END OF A DAY.
YOU'RE WIPED OUT, YOU'RE BRAIN DEAD.
WE WOULD NEED TO LOOK AT IT ON A FRIDAY, DO IT FIRST.
THEN, IF IT WOULD ALSO ALLOW, IF WE CAN GET US ALL TOGETHER, THEN I WANT TO MAXIMIZE THE REST OF THAT MORNING.
I'D LOVE TO HIT A FEW OF THE ITEMS. I SAW A BUDGET WORKSHOP GOING AROUND FOUR DAYS.
I THINK IT'S AGGRESSIVE TO DO IT IN TWO, BUT I KNOW IT'S BEEN DONE IN TWO AND A HALF, THREE, AND SO THAT 8TH FRIDAY MAY BE A REALLY GOOD OPPORTUNITY.
JUMP IN ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO PUT A NAME OR TWO OUT OF WHO YOU MIGHT BE LEANING TOWARDS.
IF YOU DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THAT, TELL ME WHAT YOU SEE DOWN THERE THAT YOU NEED IN A SKILL SET AND WHAT TYPE OF PERSON YOU'RE LOOKING FOR.
>> I WOULD TELL YOU ONE THING I THINK WE MIGHT WANT TO CONSIDER IS WHETHER THERE ARE SOMEBODY THAT HAS PERHAPS SERVED ON THE EDC BEFORE THAT HAS SOME EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE AND INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE THAT MIGHT BE WILLING TO STEP UP AGAIN.
IT WOULD BE ADVANTAGEOUS BECAUSE I THINK WE HAVE A BOARD THAT IS GETTING SOME EXPERIENCE, BUT BECAUSE OF THE WAY THINGS WERE REPLACED, WE'VE LOST SOME INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE, BACKGROUND, SOME HISTORY THAT PEOPLE MIGHT NOT KNOW.
IT MIGHT BE ALSO ADVANTAGEOUS, TOO, IF WE HAD A PREVIOUS BOARD MEMBER WHO'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN A SEARCH BEFORE FOR THE EDC;
[01:55:04]
HE MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE SOME BACKGROUND PERSPECTIVE.OBVIOUSLY, I DON'T THINK IT SHOULD BE ANYBODY THAT'S BEEN WITHIN THE LAST YEAR, TWO, THREE, MAYBE FIVE FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
BUT I THINK THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT HAVE SERVED OUR COMMUNITY BEFORE IN THAT ROLE, AND I THINK THAT MAY BE ONE FACTOR THAT I WOULD WANT TO CONSIDER IN LOOKING AT, WHO WE MIGHT PLACE, TO BE ABLE TO HAVE SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN THERE AND DONE THAT BEFORE AND CAN BRING SOME OF THAT HISTORY AND KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE TO THE TABLE.
>> THANK YOU, SIR. I APPRECIATE THAT INSIGHT. COUNCILMAN TIPPS.
>> I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY I MEAN, NOT EVERYBODY ON HERE, BUT I WOULD SUGGEST, JUST LIKE YOU SAID WITH A CONTRACTOR, SOMEBODY THAT'S A STAKEHOLDER IN THE CITY, SOMEBODY THAT HAS RUN A BUSINESS THAT UNDERSTANDS THE BUSINESSES.
I THINK THAT'S PLUGGED IN TO THE AMARILLO ECONOMY.
I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT ON THE EDC.
I THINK THAT THERE'S A SKILL SET, DEFINITELY, THAT NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT THERE.
WE'VE GOT FOUR ON THERE, BUT TO LOOK AT THOSE FOUR, AND MAYBE, IT'S JUST LIKE UP HERE, WHO WOULD COMPLEMENT WHAT'S ALREADY THERE, IN MY OPINION.
>> THE THREE THINGS THAT I'M REALLY LOOKING AT, AND I THINK YOU GUYS HIT ON ALL THREE OF THEM.
ONE IS A WILLINGNESS TO SERVE.
PUTTING SOMEBODY ON THERE THAT HASN'T SHOWN THAT INTEREST OR IS WILLING TO FILL ONE OF THOSE ROLES, I THINK, IS SOMEWHERE WE SHOULDN'T GO.
BUT ALSO, I AGREE WITH WHAT HAS BEEN SAID HERE AS FAR AS THAT PAST EXPERIENCE, BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW IF THAT PERSON IS JUST GOING TO SERVE TILL DECEMBER, BECAUSE THEY MAY PULL THEMSELVES OUT AFTER THAT.
HAVING SOMEBODY THAT KNOWS WHAT'S GOING ON AND NOT HAVING THAT LARGE LEARNING CURVE.
I'M NOT SAYING THAT THAT'S THE ULTIMATE CRITERIA, BUT THEN ALSO THE PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND, AND WHERE WE MIGHT WANT TO FALL WITH THAT.
THOSE ARE THE THREE THINGS THAT I'M LOOKING AT.
>> I THINK I WOULD ECHO THE SENTIMENT.
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ATTRACT IS LARGE BUSINESS.
WE NEED BUSINESS OWNERS THAT HAVE A STAKE IN THE COMMUNITY THAT KNOW WHAT AMARILLO IS ABOUT.
I DO LIKE THE INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE.
UNFORTUNATELY, WE HAD A HUGE GAP WITH THE TURMOIL THAT WE HAD EARLY LAST YEAR WHEN EVERYBODY LEFT.
FILLING THAT VOID WOULD HELP US, ESPECIALLY IF THEY WERE PART OF SEARCH COMMITTEE.
>> WOULD WE LIKE TO LEAVE IT AT THAT POINT? WOULD WE LIKE TO DISCUSS A FEW OPTIONS AND NAMES? THERE'S BENEFITS ON BOTH SIDES.
IF WE PUT A NAME OUT HERE TODAY, IT GIVES US SOMETHING TO CHEW ON, AS OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS.
IF YOU HAVE SOMEBODY THAT HAS PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE, INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE, AND YOU KNOW WHERE YOU'RE GOING, IT COULD BE BETTER FOR THE REST OF US TO HELP TO COME PREPARED.
HOWEVER, IT ALSO CAN BE ADVANTAGEOUS TO OUR COMMUNITY? NOT TO LIST NAMES? WE HAVE A LIST OF PEOPLE THAT ARE WILLING TO SERVE, AND YOU MAY KNOW WHO YOU THINK IS A GOOD FIT? I WOULD ASK THAT YOU WOULDN'T BRING ANYBODY THAT YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY TALKED TO, AND YOU DON'T KNOW THEIR FULL LEVEL OF COMMITMENT TO BE 100%.
IN MOVING IT FORWARD, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY NAMES THEY'D LIKE TO OFFER OR ARE WE GOOD KNOWING THE DIRECTIONAL ROLE WE'RE TRYING TO FILL? COUNCILMAN.
>> THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'VE NEVER REALLY DONE BEFORE, TO PUT THE NAMES OUT THERE.
I COULD SEE AS THERE MAY BE SOME BENEFIT OR SOME DRAWBACKS TO THAT.
I DON'T KNOW. IF WE CAN WAIT TILL WE GET TO THE POINT WHERE WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THE DECISION AND DO THE NOMINATIONS AT THAT POINT.
>> AREN'T WE ABOUT TRANSPARENCY?
>> IT TENDS TO WORK VERY WELL WHEN WE JUST KEEP IT ALL OUT THERE.
WHERE YOU GET HUNG UP IS WHERE YOU'RE A LITTLE BIT OUT THERE AND THEN A LITTLE BIT NOT.
I LIKE BEING ALL THE WAY OUT THERE.
THE LIGHTS ALL THE WAY ON. IT'S PRETTY GOOD.
I THINK IF WE WERE GOING TO WORRY ABOUT OFFENDING PEOPLE, WE PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE STARTED FOUR YEARS AGO.
>> IN TERMS OF TRANSPARENCY, I THINK THAT THE TWO INDIVIDUALS THAT I'VE HEARD THAT WOULD BE INTERESTED ARE WILL MILLER AND BRIAN BRUCKNER.
>> BRUCKNER. THOSE ARE GOOD NUMBER.
>> BRIAN BRUCKNER, AND WILL MILLER.
>> HAVE YOU SPOKEN TO BRIAN? HE'S NOT ON LIST.
>> I'VE SPOKEN TO BRIAN. THAT WAS THE PERSON I WAS THINKING ABOUT.
BRIAN IS PRESIDENT OF BROKER TRUCKING,
[02:00:01]
WHICH HAS BEEN A BUSINESS HERE SINCE 1932.THEY'VE GROWN TO BE IN NINE STATES, AND THEY HAVE 1,600 EMPLOYEES AT THIS POINT.
BUT IT'S A FAMILY BUSINESS WITH BRIAN AND HIS BROTHER CHRIS RUNNING.
THEY'RE ALSO THE LARGEST MA TRUCK DEALERSHIP IN THE US.
I THINK HE'S GOT SOME SIGNIFICANT JOBS IN BACKGROUND, BUT ALSO BRIAN SERVED TWO TERMS. I THINK HE CAME OFF IN '19.
FROM ABOUT 2013-2019, HE SERVED AND HE HAS SERVED ON TWO SEARCH COMMITTEES BEFORE.
THAT'S A NAME THAT I'VE CHECKED WITH, AND HE SAID HE WOULD BE WILLING TO STEP UP IF CALLED.
>> I PERSONALLY KNOW BOTH OF THOSE GENTLEMEN IN THEIR OUTSTANDING BUSINESSMEN AND OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY LEADERS, AND THEY BLEED AMARILLO.
>> WELL, AND I'LL SAY ON WILL MILLER AND MR. BRUCKNER, BOTH HAVE A HEART FOR THE COMMUNITY.
WHEN YOU SEE THE WAY THAT THEY MANAGE LIFE FAMILY, THEY GIVE, AND THEY'RE CONSTANTLY SERVING THEIR COMMUNITY.
WILL MILLER TENDS TO BE SWITZERLAND.
HE KNOWS HOW TO RUN A BANK AND RUN A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND DEAL WITH ALL THINGS BUSINESS.
I LOVE THE FACT THAT HE LIVES IN CANYON AND WE DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE JUST THE ONE VIEWPOINT THAT WE'VE ALWAYS HAD.
MAN, I'M A FAN OF MR. ALARCON, ACTUALLY.
I'VE SEEN THAT GUY DIG IN AND JUST BE SOMEBODY WITH LOTS OF ENERGY AND THEN A REAL GROUND LEVEL.
NOT THE SAME 30,000 FOOT VIEW THAT I'D BE LOOKING FOR WITH WILL MILLER.
MORE OF THE GUY WHO HANDS ON IS DIGGING IN TO DEAL BY DEAL.
BRUCKNER TRUCK SALES IS A PHENOMENAL COMPANY.
I THINK WITH A LARGE COMPANY LIKE THAT, THAT'S MULTI STATE AND SO BIG, AND THEN THEY BRING A LOT TO THE TABLE.
HE WOULD BE AN ASSET THAT WOULD HELP US TO REPLACE WHERE WE'VE BEEN WITH SOME OF THAT KNOWLEDGE. COUNCILMAN.
>> I DON'T DISAGREE WITH ANY OF THOSE.
AGAIN, BUSINESS OWNER, KNOWING PERSONALLY, GOOD NEGOTIATOR, UNDERSTANDS AGRICULTURE, UNDERSTANDS SMALL BUSINESS, AND AGAIN, A BIG BELIEVER IN AMARILLO.
>> HE WAS IN GRAIN AND WHEAT FOR A LONG TIME.
HE HAS QUITE A BIT. COUNCILMAN REID, YOU GOT ANYTHING YOU WANT TO OFFER?
>> MR. MAYOR, I'D LIKE TO ADD ONE FINAL POINT.
>> WHEN WE LOOK AT SOMEONE THAT HAS MULTI STATE EXPERIENCE, THEY PROBABLY HAVE DEALT WITH OTHER EDCS AND WHAT THE LANDSCAPE LOOKS LIKE IN INCENTIVES AND HOW THAT WORKS, AND THAT WOULD BE, I THINK, A BENEFIT TO US.
>> I THINK YOUR CASE IS PROBABLY PRETTY STRONG, AND I THINK IF WE WERE TO CONTINUE, YOU WOULD PROBABLY BUILD IT EVEN STRONGER IN SOME OF THE EXPERTISE THAT MAY BE THERE.
THEN I'M NOT PUSHING BACK ON THE EXPERIENCE AT ALL.
I LOVE THE FACT THAT WE HAVE SOME EXPERIENCE WITH MR. NELSON AND HIS TEAM.
BUT THEN, WE'VE GOT SOME REALLY STRONG BOARD MEMBERS THAT HAVE A LOT OF GOOD BUSINESS EXPERIENCE.
BUT NOT NECESSARILY A LOT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCE AND SOMEWHAT OF HOW THE RULES OF THE GAME AND HOW EVERYTHING IS COMPETITIVE ACROSS THE STATE.
I THINK WE'RE DOING A SERVICE HERE BY PUTTING THESE NAMES OUT HERE AND DISCUSSING THEM.
THERE'S A LOT OF GOOD NAMES ON THIS LIST THAT WE'RE NOT DISCUSSING, BUT WE'RE HEAVILY CONSIDERED.
THERE'S A COUPLE OTHER CONTRACTORS ON THERE THAT I FEEL VERY STRONGLY ABOUT AS WELL, AND I'D LOVE TO HAVE THEM ON THE TEAM.
BUT THIS IS A POSITION THAT WE NEED TO GET PLACED.
I FEEL LIKE THIS IS EVERYTHING THAT I NEEDED OUT OF THE DISCUSSION.
I'M GOING TO ASK CITY MANAGER, DO YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE AT THIS POINT WITH WHAT YOU WOULD BE LOOKING AT IF WE WERE TO LOOK AT A SPECIAL SESSION AND MOVE INTO THAT PART OF THE CONVERSATION?
>> YES. I'VE BEEN TALKING WITH MS. STORRS.
WE WERE CONSIDERING POSSIBLY ANOTHER HALF DAY FOR BUDGET ANYWAYS ON THAT FRIDAY.
THIS CAN WORK WELL. WE CAN HAVE THAT AS PART OF THAT DAY AS WELL.
>> COUNCIL, I FEEL LIKE WE'VE HAD AS GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE DISCUSSION AS WE CAN.
I DON'T THINK ANY OF US ARE GOING ANY DIRECTION THAT WE DON'T WANT TO GO OR THAT WE DON'T FEEL LIKE WE SHOULDN'T MOVE TOGETHER.
ARE YOU ALL GOOD WITH PUTTING A SPECIAL SESSION ON THAT FRIDAY? I'D CALL IT FIRST THING IN THE MORNING.
WE PROBABLY TRY TO DO 8:30, I GET THAT ONE DONE AND RESERVE THE REST OF THE TIME FOR STAFF.
>> ONE OTHER THING, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, WE HAVE, OF COURSE, IF WE'RE APPOINTING ONE VACANCY NOW, BUT I THINK AT THE END THAT TERM WILL EXPIRE.
I DO THINK OBVIOUSLY, WE PROBABLY NEED TO GET SOMEBODY WHO'S WILLING TO STEP UP FOR THE SECOND TERM, FILLING OUT THE FIRST TERM.
BUT ALSO WE HAVE ANOTHER POSITION OPEN AT THAT POINT AS WELL.
THAT MAY BE SOMETHING WEIRD TO CROSS ROADS,
[02:05:02]
AND I THINK ALL THESE NAMES THAT WERE BROUGHT UP ARE EXCELLENT CHOICES.WE COULD HAVE POTENTIALLY ANOTHER ROLE TO FILL IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS AS WELL.
>> ONE GOOD THING THAT I HAVE SEEN, AND THEN, COUNCILMAN, I'LL LET YOU JUMP BACK IN.
OUT OF THE FOUR THAT REMAIN OVER THERE, REALLY GOOD CHEMISTRY, LIKE GOOD QUESTIONS, GOOD DISCUSSION, AND MOVING THE BALL FORWARD EVERY TIME.
EVERY ONE OF THEM ARE SHOWING UP WITH THE WILLINGNESS OF, LIKE, MAN, I'M HERE TO MAKE THIS BETTER.
WHAT CAN I DO TO HELP? I LOVE THAT.
ADDING THIS FIFTH PERSON AND SEEING WHERE THAT DYNAMIC IS WILL HELP US GREATLY WHILE WE GET THIS DIRECTOR HIRED AND GET THE SEARCH FIRM OUT THERE.
COUNCILMAN PRESCOTT, YOU HAD ONE FINAL COMMENT? ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THIS ONE BEFORE WE TAKE A QUICK RECESS? GOOD DISCUSSION. THANK YOU, GUYS.
I APPRECIATE THAT. THAT CLOSES ITEM 9F.
ITEM 9G IS A REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.
[9.G. Request future agenda items and reports from City Manager]
DO WE HAVE ANY THAT WE NEED TO PUT ON NEXT AGENDA ON THE 12TH?>> MAYOR, I'VE GOT ONE. I'D LIKE TO PUT A DISCUSSION ITEM ON THE CIVIC CENTER IMPROVEMENTS.
>> CIVIC CENTER IMPROVEMENTS ON THE 12TH. NO PROBLEM.
WE SHOULD BE READY FOR THAT ONE BY THEN. ANY OTHERS?
>> GOVERNANCE AND NDS, WILL IT COME BACK?
>> IT WILL. WE ACTUALLY WERE READY FOR THAT.
I PUSHED IT JUST BECAUSE WE HAD A FULL SCHEDULE.
GOVERNANCE AND NDS DISCUSSION, AND THEN THERE WERE A COUPLE OF OTHER ONES THAT'LL BE READY BY THEN THAT'LL STAY IN THE FOLD.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO ADD A POSSIBLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPDATE.
FROM DATA THAT WE HAD FROM THE TRIP TO AUSTIN AND JUST A REVISION ON PRICING.
>> I THINK THAT WOULD BE GOOD.
WE'LL LEAVE THAT IN THE HANDS OF STAFF.
STAFF, IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE READY TO DO A FULL PRESENTATION BY THEN, THEN WE'LL GIVE YOU MORE TIME, BUT IT IS GOING TO BE A GOOD TOPIC RIGHT AFTER BUDGET.
>> WE'D ACTUALLY DISCUSSED DOING THAT AT THE SECOND MEETING IN AUGUST.
GIVES US A LITTLE TIME TO GET PREPARED FOR THAT, BUT WE CAN BRING YOU SOME WORKS.
>> I BELIEVE SO. ARE YOU GOOD WITH AUGUST STILL? GREAT. AT THIS TIME, WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE A 10-MINUTE RECESS.
WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK IN HERE TO DO ALL OF OUR NON-CONSENT. THANK YOU, GUYS.
WE ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL OURSELVES BACK TO ORDER HERE, MOVE INTO OUR NON-CONSENT AGENDA.
ONE THING I WILL SAY, I KNOW IT'S EASY FOR ME, JUST BECAUSE I'M TALKING THIS DIRECTION.
THESE MICROPHONES ARE PRETTY DIRECTIONAL.
AS I TURN AND SPEAK THIS WAY, IT DOESN'T PICK IT UP.
FOR MY COUNCIL MEMBERS, IF YOU'RE GOING THIS WAY, MOVE YOUR FACE BEHIND THE MICROPHONE AS YOU WORK IT AROUND.
JUST FOR EVERYBODY THAT'S ONLINE AND EVERYBODY THAT'S HERE.
ITEM 10A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION,
[10.A. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 8202]
ONE OF OUR FAVORITE PRESENTERS, MR. BRADY KENDRICK.>> GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
THIS FIRST ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 8202.
THIS IS THE CONSIDER THE REZONING OF A 3.39 ACRE TRACT OF LAND.
THIS IS A PORTION OF TRACT 2, WESTCLIFF PARK UNIT 18, LOCATED IN POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS, IN THE VICINITY OF SUNCREST WAY AND ROSENDA LANE.
THEY ARE REQUESTING THE REZONE FROM PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 55BCG TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 55AA TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY WITH 20 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES THAT ARE GOING TO BE ZERO LOT LINE STYLE.
THE APPLICANT IS OJD ENGINEERING LLC FOR ROCKING B INVESTMENTS, LLC.
ON THE SCREEN RIGHT THERE IS THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE WESTCLIFF SUBDIVISION.
THE REASON FOR THE REQUEST IS WHILE THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT DOES ALLOW FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, THEY'RE REQUESTING SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT STANDARDS THAN ALLOWED FOR BY THE BASE PLAN DEVELOPMENT.
THEY WERE REQUESTING A FIVE-FOOT REDUCTION IN THE LOT WIDTH FROM 50-45 FEET AND A 100 SQUARE FOOT REDUCTION TO THE MINIMUM LOT AREA.
THEY WERE REQUESTING A LOT AREA OF 4,900 SQUARE FEET.
REGARDING CITY PLAN 2045 IN CONFORMANCE, THIS REQUEST WOULD CONFORM WITH CITY PLAN AND THE IDENTIFIED PLACE TYPE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD LOW.
THE DENSITIES ARE IN LINE WITH WHAT IS CALLED FOR.
AS NOTED, THESE ARE GOING TO BE ZERO LOT LINE HOMES, MEANING THAT THE HOMES ARE SET OFF THE ONE SIDE OF THE LOT AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE DETACHED.
MUCH LIKE WHAT IS SEEN IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT 55Z, WHICH IS PICTURED ON THE RIGHT THERE THAT WAS DEVELOPED AT THE SOUTH END OF THIS STREET, THAT IS ONE BLOCK SOUTH OF THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY THERE IN THE RED BOX.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOUND THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS IN
[02:10:02]
CHARACTER WITH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AND ZONING PATTERNS IN THIS AREA, AND BELIEVE THAT THIS WOULD BE A GOOD FIT, AND THE REASON THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING IT IS THAT THESE SLIGHTLY REDUCED LOT STANDARDS IS THE TOPOGRAPHY IS A LITTLE CHALLENGING IN THIS PART OF WESTCLIFF, AND THEY NEEDED THAT SLIGHTLY HIGHER DENSITY TO MAKE THE PROJECT MORE SUCCESSFUL AND ECONOMICAL.NOTICES WERE SENT ON THIS AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, AND WE DID RECEIVE ONE PHONE CALL THAT WAS JUST A GENERAL INQUIRY ABOUT WHAT THE REQUEST WAS FOR AND ONCE EXPLAINED, IT DID NOT EXPRESS ANY OPPOSITION.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM WITH A 6-0 VOTE.
>> QUESTIONS FOR BRADY, COUNCIL? PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. THANK YOU, MR. KENDRICK.
>> AT THIS TIME, WE WILL OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
DO I HAVE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NO ONE HERE TODAY THAT'S GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> I MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 8202 AS PRESENTED.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
[10.B. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 07-22-25-3]
ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING, MS. RODARTE, IF YOU WOULD COME UP HERE.>> ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
TODAY, WE'RE REQUESTING A PUBLIC HEARING AND YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THIS RESOLUTION FOR OUR FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
>> CAN YOU MOVE THE MICROPHONE JUST A LITTLE BIT CLOSER. THANK YOU.
>> FOR OUR FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
PUBLIC HEARING IN YOUR CONSIDERATION OF OUR FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
OUR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, CDAC MEMBERS, THEY MET IN JUNE TO HOST A FIRST PUBLIC MEETING AND HEARING ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM.
WE HAVE TWO OF OUR CDAC MEMBERS HERE WITH US TODAY, KAT MASSEY AND LEE STUDER ARE BOTH IN THE AUDIENCE.
I DON'T THINK I MISSED ANYONE ELSE, BUT IF I DID, LET ME KNOW.
BUT WE HAD OUR PUBLIC HEARING WITH CDAC ON JUNE 26.
EVERY FIVE YEARS HUD REQUIRES THAT ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES WHO RECEIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT FUNDS AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP FUNDS, PREPARE A FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN.
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING.
AMARILLO RECEIVES THESE ENTITLEMENT FUNDS BASED ON OUR POPULATION, BASED ON THE NUMBERS OF INDIVIDUALS LIVING IN POVERTY, BASED ON OUR HOUSING STOCK.
THERE ARE DIFFERENT FACTORS THAT FORMULATE THE GRANT THAT THE CITY OF AMARILLO RECEIVES.
THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPONENTS OF A CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
WE RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY.
ON SEVERAL DIFFERENT OCCASIONS WE TRY TO ENGAGE COMMUNITY PARTNERS, AND THEY ALSO DO ASSESSMENTS OF THE HOMELESSNESS SITUATION IN OUR COMMUNITY AS WELL AS THE HOUSING SITUATION.
THE CORE PRINCIPLES, EVERYBODY WHO BENEFITS FROM THESE FUNDS NEED TO BE LOW OR MODERATE INCOME PERSONS OR COMMUNITIES.
FOR CDBG FUNDS AND HOME FUNDS, WE NEED TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.
THOSE ARE REALLY THE INDIVIDUALS WE'RE TRYING TO ENGAGE WHEN WE'RE ASKING FOR SURVEY INPUT OR FEEDBACK.
THAT'S WHERE THE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMES IN THROUGH SURVEYS AND PUBLIC EVENTS, ALSO PUBLIC HEARINGS.
WE TRY TO ALSO LEVERAGE RESOURCES WITHIN THE CITY AND ALSO OTHER PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, AND THAT WE CONSIDER PARTNER INVOLVEMENT IN THE FUNDS AND THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.
THE INVESTMENT NEEDS TO BE STRATEGIC AND TARGETED PARTNERSHIPS.
WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THIS.
FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, THERE ARE SOME PROJECTS THAT ARE ELIGIBLE AND THERE ARE SOME THAT ARE INELIGIBLE.
SOME EXAMPLES, HOUSING REHABILITATION.
PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES ARE ELIGIBLE FUNDS.
THIS IS HELPING THOSE IN THE COMMUNITY, HELPING NON-PROFITS IN THE COMMUNITY CARRY OUT THEIR MISSION TO SERVE OTHERS, COUNSELING SERVICE, SUBSISTENCE PAYMENTS, CHILDCARE, DOMESTIC VIOLENT SERVICES, HOMELESS SERVICES.
WE CAN ALSO INVEST THESE FUNDS IN PUBLIC FACILITIES IF IT BENEFITS THE PUBLIC AND IN PLANNING THEY HAVE TO ESSENTIALLY MEET IN ELIGIBLE MATRIX CODE.
IN ELIGIBLE EXAMPLES, WE CAN'T USE THE FUNDING TO FUND RAISE.
WE CAN'T USE THEM FOR REGULAR EXPENSES RELATED TO THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF GOVERNMENT AND SO ON.
BENEFICIARIES, ESSENTIALLY, AT LEAST 51% OF THOSE WHO BENEFIT FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAVE TO BE IN THE LMI LOW TO MODERATE INCOME BRACKET.
SOME ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS OUR PUBLIC SERVICE GRANTS, 100% OF THOSE WHO BENEFIT MUST FALL INTO THAT LMI CATEGORY.
[02:15:06]
>> FOR PROJECT ELIGIBILITY HERE, HOME ESSENTIALLY FOCUSES ON EITHER BUILDING, BUYING OR REHABILITATING HOUSING.
IT CAN ALSO PROVIDE DIRECT RENTAL ASSISTANCE.
OUR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STARTED BACK IN JANUARY AT THE POINT IN TIME RESOURCE FAIR, WE ENGAGED INDIVIDUALS WHO ATTENDED THAT, AND THAT CONTINUED THROUGHOUT THE SPRING AT DIFFERENT EVENTS AND WITH OUR DIFFERENT COMMUNITY PARTNERS.
IN JUNE, WE ATTENDED STARLIGHT THEATER, A COUPLE OF THE EVENTS DURING THE WEEK OF JUNETEENTH AT THE SOCIAL SERVICES NIGHT AND THE JUNETEENTH BRUNCH.
THEN WE ALSO HAD THE CDAC MEETING FOR THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IN JUNE 26TH.
THROUGHOUT THE MONTH OF JULY, THE 30-DAY COMMENT PERIOD IS CONTINUED, AND WE'VE PUBLISHED THAT PUBLIC NOTICE IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS, BOTH IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH.
TODAY'S CITY COUNCIL MEETING SERVES AS THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS PARTICULAR ITEM.
TO DATE, WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENT OUTSIDE OF OUR SURVEYS DURING THIS 30-DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.
AT THE BEGINNING OF JUNE, WE'VE RECEIVED OVER 200 SURVEYS, BUT AS I NOTED, WE ENGAGED IN SEVERAL DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES IN THE MONTH OF JUNE, SO WE KNOW THAT WE'VE ACCRUED MORE SURVEYS AT THIS TIME.
OUR CONSULTANTS HAVE HELPED US COMPILE THE DATA AND DO A LOT OF RESEARCH INTO THE CITY OF AMARILLO AND THE DEMOGRAPHICS AND THE HOUSING STOCK IN AMARILLO TO COMPILE OUR CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
THERE WERE SEVERAL DIFFERENT PRIORITIES THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED.
EMERGENCY OR MINOR REHABILITATION, WE CARRY OUT THOSE ACTIVITIES THROUGH OUR CARE PROGRAM OR MINOR REHAB PROGRAM.
HOMELESS SERVICES, WHICH ALSO INCLUDE MENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, AND HOUSING OR HOUSING ASSISTANCE.
THOSE WERE SOME OF THE PRIORITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.
ESSENTIALLY HOW THIS WORKS IS THEY IDENTIFY NEEDS, AND FROM THOSE NEEDS, WE DECIDE WHAT PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES WE'RE GOING TO CARRY OUT.
THE EXAMPLE HERE, IF THE NEED IS TO PROVIDE DECENT HOUSING, THEN THE PROJECT MIGHT BE HOUSING REHABILITATION AND PRESERVATION, AND SO AN EMERGENCY REPAIR THROUGH THE CARE PROGRAM, 555 MAIN STREET WOULD BE CARRIED OUT.
THAT WOULD BE THE SPECIFIC ACTIVITY.
THE PRIORITY NEEDS, THREE WERE IDENTIFIED.
DECENT HOUSING, CREATING A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LMI RESIDENTS OF AMARILLO.
THE GOALS THEN THAT INFORM OUR ACTIVITIES ARE HOUSING, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC SERVICES, AND THEN ADMINISTRATION TO CARRY OUT THE ACTIVITIES.
HOW WE PROJECTED THESE FUNDS WAS WE LOOKED AT WHAT OUR ALLOCATION IS FOR FISCAL YEAR '25 FROM THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND WE PROJECTED THAT OUT FIVE YEARS.
WE DON'T KNOW, WE ARE NOT GUARANTEED THAT WE'LL RECEIVE THIS FUNDING OVER EACH YEAR OR AN EXACT DOLLAR AMOUNT, BUT THIS IS JUST AN ESTIMATE.
WE ANTICIPATE SPENDING JUST SHORT OF $6.5 MILLION IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
WE CARRY THAT OUT THROUGH CARE AND MINOR.
ALSO, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, WE PARTNER WITH THEM.
WE ARE REQUIRED TO DESIGNATE A PERCENTAGE OF FUNDING TO WHAT WE CALL THE COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION OR CHDO, AND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IS THE PARTNER THAT WE WORK WITH THERE.
RENTAL ASSISTANCE THROUGH THE TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
THEN CREATING A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT FALLS UNDER HOUSING THROUGH DEMOLITION OF SLAM AND BLIGHT, AND WE ANTICIPATE CONTRIBUTING $1 MILLION TOWARD THOSE EFFORTS WITHIN THE CITY.
THESE ARE PARKS AND SIDEWALK PROJECTS.
WE'RE ABLE TO LEVERAGE FUNDING IN THE SIDEWALK PROJECTS.
WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO UTILIZE OUR CDBG FUNDING ALONGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DOLLARS TO EXPAND THE SIDEWALK PROJECTS THAT WE'VE DONE.
THEN FOR PARKS AS WELL, WE'RE LEVERAGING THE PARKS THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE AND THE INVESTMENT ALREADY IN THE PARKS TO BUILD UPON THAT AND MAKE BETTER AND MORE ACCESSIBLE PARKS FOR PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY, SPECIFICALLY PEOPLE IN LMI AREAS OF THE COMMUNITY.
PUBLIC SERVICES IS OUR NEXT ACTIVITY, AND THAT WE FOCUS IN ORDER TO REALLY TARGET THE FUNDS.
WE FOCUS ON HOMELESS SERVICES AND THOSE SERVICES THAT ARE FOCUSED ON PREVENTING HOMELESSNESS.
ABOUT $1.2 MILLION, WE ANTICIPATE INVESTING IN OTHER NONPROFITS.
THEN ADMINISTRATION COSTS BETWEEN BOTH PROGRAMS. THE ADMINISTRATION COSTS WILL BE ABOUT 1.9 MILLION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.
THE NEXT TWO SLIDES JUST BREAK DOWN THE FUNDING PER PROGRAM.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
[02:20:03]
>> QUESTIONS, COUNSEL? NONE. GOOD PRESENTATION, MA'AM. WE APPRECIATE THAT.
WOULD AT THIS TIME, OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 10B.
DO I HAVE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR, AGAINST THIS ITEM? MR. FISHER, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
>> WELL, THIS GOES ALONG THE LINES OF SOME OF WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT EARLIER.
WE HAVE TWO FORMER CITY EMPLOYEES THAT ARE IN JAIL FOR STEALING I THINK ABOUT A MILLION BUCKS FROM HUD MONEY, AND I FIND IT IRONIC THAT THEY HAVE A CON PLAN IN HERE.
LOOK AT THAT. IT SAYS CON PLAN, CON PLAN.
IT'S IRONIC, BUT WHAT I'D LIKE TO KNOW IS, WHAT ARE WE DOING DIFFERENT NOW? HOW IS IT SEPARATED? IS IT ON THE CHECK REGISTER? IS IT SEPARATE? SO WE CAN AUDIT THIS, SO WE CAN SEE WHO'S GETTING THIS MONEY.
NOW I'M SEEING HOW TRANSFORMATION PARK WAS CREATED, AND I'M SEEING A LOT OF THIS MONEY GOING TO TRANSFORMATION PARK.
FOR ANYBODY THAT THINKS I'M JUST UP HERE, JUST THIS GUY HATING ON EVERYTHING.
I LIVED ON HUD, MAN, I WOULDN'T BE HERE RIGHT NOW.
WELFARE, FOOD STAMPS, ALL THAT STUFF.
I WAS HOMELESS AND I HAD THE AMERICAN DREAM AND IT'S MY DUTY TO LOOK OVER THIS, TO MAKE SURE THIS MONEY IS GOING TO THE OTHER MICS THAT ARE COMING UP, TO THE OTHER COALS THAT ARE COMING UP.
ANYBODY ELSE HAS GONE THROUGH THIS, THEY WOULDN'T BE HERE IF IT WASN'T FOR THAT.
WE HAD PUBLIC OFFICIALS, OUR EMPLOYEES STEALING THIS MONEY.
WHAT ARE THE AUDITS THAT ARE IN PLACE? LIKE THEY TALKED ABOUT SIDEWALKS, IS THERE A WAY TO PREVENT CANCELING OUT CITY BUDGET AND MOVING THIS MONEY TO PAY FOR SIDEWALKS THAT WOULD HAVE PROBABLY BEEN PAID FOR BY THE CITY BUDGET? WE'RE JUST ROBBING PETER TO PAY PAUL, AND I'D LIKE TO KNOW, HOW DO WE AVOID THOSE THINGS AND THE OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE REGISTER?
>> NO. I APPRECIATE YOU SPEAKING ON IT, AND I'LL DIRECT IT TO MR. PATH, IF YOU'D LIKE ME TO HAVE STEPHANIE COME BACK UP OR IF YOU'D LIKE TO HANDLE IT A DIFFERENT WAY.
WE HAVE SEVERAL CONTROLS IN PLACE.
>> EITHER STEPHANIE OR JASON, YES.
>> AM I FREE TO JUST SPEAK ABOUT ALL THIS? IN REGARDS TO THE EMPLOYEES THAT WERE CONVICTED OF WHAT THEY'VE DONE, WE HAVE DONE AN EXTREMELY THOROUGH AUDIT OF OUR DEPARTMENT AND HAVE COMPLETELY CHANGED THE WAY THAT THOSE PROGRAMS THAT THOSE INDIVIDUALS WERE INVOLVED IN, THAT THE WAY THAT THAT HAS BEEN HANDLED IS COMPLETELY REVAMPED.
IT GOES THROUGH MULTIPLE CHECKS AND BALANCES WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT AND OUTSIDE OF THE DEPARTMENT.
ADDITIONALLY, WE DID NOT HAVE AN ACCOUNTANT IN OUR DEPARTMENT PRIOR, AND SO WE NOW HAVE A CPA-CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANT THAT'S IN THE DEPARTMENT, SO THINGS GO THROUGH HER AND THEN IT GOES ONTO OUR ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT.
AS FAR AS CHECKS AND BALANCES, IT IS EXTREMELY BALANCED NOW.
I'M VERY PLEASED WITH THE METHODS AND THE PROCESSES THAT WE PUT IN PLACE.
THINGS ARE WRITTEN DOWN EXACTLY HOW WE DO IT.
WE HAVE PRESENTED THAT TO HUD.
WE PRESENTED THAT TO THE OIG, ALL OF THE ENTITIES THAT WERE INVOLVED IN THIS INVESTIGATION, AND THEY WERE BEYOND PLEASED WITH THE PROCESSES THAT WE HAVE PUT IN PLACE, AND HAVE ACTUALLY GIVEN US NO FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS ON ANYTHING TO DO FURTHER THAN WHAT WE'VE DONE.
>> THANK YOU. APPRECIATE THAT.
COUNSEL, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. RIDDLESBERGER? MR. FISHER, I APPRECIATE YOU SPEAKING.
BEFORE MOVING ON, SEE IF I HAVE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.
>> THE QUESTION IS, WHAT ABOUT THE CHECK REGISTER? WE CAN ANSWER THAT AS WELL.
AS FAR AS DISBURSEMENT OF THESE FUNDS, HOW WILL THAT BE HANDLED?
>> LAURA, IS THAT SOMETHING YOU CAN ANSWER?
I WAS TRYING TO GET THE MICROPHONE TO WORK.
THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE FUNDS WOULD GO THROUGH THE NORMAL HUD PROCESSES, AND SINCE THESE ARE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, I BELIEVE, THEY WOULD GO THROUGH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BANK ACCOUNT, AND IT WOULD ALL BE DOCUMENTED INSIDE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BANK ACCOUNT.
>> THEN THAT'LL BE PRODUCED ON THE CHECK REGISTER AS WE NOW PUT THAT ONLINE, CORRECT?
>> THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK REGISTER IS NOT PART OF THE PULLED CHECK REGISTER,
[02:25:05]
WHICH IS THE ONE THAT WE ARE POSTING ONLINE, BUT WE COULD CERTAINLY PRODUCE THAT FOR ANYONE WHO NEEDED IT.IT WOULD REQUIRE POTENTIALLY SOME REDACTION BECAUSE IT IS FEDERAL DOLLARS WITH SOME CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION GOING THROUGH IT.
>> WELL, I'LL GO BACK TO MY EARLIER STATEMENT ABOUT NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED, SO IT IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF A CITIZEN AND A CONSTITUENT OF OURS SITTING HERE SAYING, "WELL, NOW.
HERE WE GO AGAIN." WE KNOW WE HAVE ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE, SOMETHING HAPPENED.
WE'VE ADMITTED THAT, THE FBI TOOK THAT, PROSECUTED IT.
WE'RE THANKFUL THAT THAT'S NOT HAPPENING.
BUT THEN WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD, HOW ARE WE MAKING SURE THAT WE DON'T GET OURSELVES BACK IN THAT POSITION? THE CHECK REGISTRY BEING TRANSPARENT AND PRODUCED IS HELPFUL, BUT IT'S PROBABLY NOT THE END ALL.
WHAT WE LOOK FOR IS INTERNAL CONTROLS AND MULTIPLE CONTROLS.
WHAT WE SAW WAS A LACK OF CONTROL, I BELIEVE.
THEN WE HAD COVID, WHICH ALLOWED FOR EVEN FEWER CONTROLS THAN WHAT WE HAD BEFORE.
I KNOW THAT'S NOT SATISFACTORY OTHER THAN WALKING IT OUT.
I WOULDN'T SAY THAT ANY AMOUNT OF TIME SPENT HERE TODAY OR HOWEVER MANY EMPLOYEES WE HAVE SPEAK WOULD SATISFY YOU AND YOUR CONCERN, BECAUSE YOUR CONCERN IS SCRUTINIZING GOVERNMENT AS A WHOLE, AND ALSO KNOWING WHAT HAS HAPPENED.
I THINK THE ADDITIONAL SCRUTINY IS WELL WARRANTED BECAUSE OF THE THEFT THAT TOOK PLACE.
BECAUSE I CAN'T SATISFY THAT HERE TODAY, I WOULD JUST SAY, IT'S HELPFUL CONVERSATION, WE'RE CONTINUING TO LOOK AT IT.
WE'RE TRYING TO CONTINUE TO IMPROVE.
THIS MAY BE AN ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENT WE WOULD LOOK AT, AND IS IT TIME WELL SPENT FOR STAFF TO REDACT THESE THINGS AND PUT THEM ON THE WEB PAGE AS WELL? I DON'T KNOW. BUT I AT LEAST APPRECIATE YOU GETTING UP TO THE MICROPHONE.
DO I HAVE ANYONE ELSE HERE TODAY? YES, OR IF YOU HAVE A COMMENT?
WHERE DID THE FUNDS COME FROM? IS IT FROM HUD? ALL THE EIGHT MILLION AND THE 3.3. IS THAT WHAT THAT [OVERLAPPING]
>> THESE ARE OUR CDBG FUNDS AND HUD FUNDS, BUT ALL COMES FROM THE SAME POOL?
>> YES, IT ALL COMES FROM THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD).
>> WHEN WILL THOSE FUNDS BE ALLOCATED? ARE THEY ALREADY BEEN ALLOCATED FOR '25?
>> FOR '25, WE HAVE THE ALLOCATION.
WE SHOULD RECEIVE THAT AROUND OCTOBER 1ST.
SOMETIMES IT COMES IN NOVEMBER, BUT IT'S ALL ON A REIMBURSEMENT.
WE KNOW OUR ALLOCATION, AND THEN JUST FOR FISCAL YEAR '25, WHICH IS ACTUALLY WHAT I'LL GO OVER NEXT SPECIFICALLY.
BUT WE KNOW THAT ALLOCATION, AND WE'LL HAVE THOSE FUNDS FOR DISBURSEMENT AFTER OCTOBER 1ST.
>> NOW, IS THAT EIGHT MILLION AND THE 3.3, IS THAT FOR THE FOUR YEARS?
>> THAT'S ANTICIPATED FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.
>> JUST ONE CLARIFYING QUESTION, AND I DON'T KNOW WHO WOULD ANSWER IT, BUT HOW DID WE DISCOVER THE THEFT?
>> I CAN RESPOND TO THAT TOO, IF NEEDED.
IT WAS DISCOVERED INTERNALLY BY OUR DEPARTMENT, AND IT WAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF OUR INTERNAL AUDIT TEAM AND OUR FINANCIAL TEAM, AND SO WE RESEARCHED IT, AND THEN WE REPORTED IT ON TO THE FBI AND TO HUD AND WENT FROM THERE.
I WILL ADD ONE ADDITIONAL COMMENT.
DURING THE TIME PERIOD THAT THIS OCCURRED, THERE WAS A CHANGE IN SOME OF THE PROCESSES AND CONTROLS THAT WE HAD NORMALLY HAD ON SOME OF THESE FUNDS BECAUSE OF COVID, AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REQUIRED US TO REMOVE SOME OF OUR CONTROLS THAT WE HAD IN PLACE TO HELP PREVENT CERTAIN THINGS FROM OCCURRING BECAUSE WE WERE IN A COVID SITUATION WHERE PEOPLE WERE REQUIRED TO STAY A CERTAIN DISTANCE, NOT COME IN TO CERTAIN FACILITIES.
WE COMPLIED WITH THE REGULATIONS THAT WE WERE GIVEN, AND UNFORTUNATELY, IT IT LEFT US EXPOSED FOR A SITUATION LIKE THIS.
>> WHAT WAS THE TIMING OF THE LAST AMOUNT OF THE FRAUD OR THEFT UNTIL WE DISCOVERED IT?
IT WAS STILL GOING ON WHEN WE DISCOVERED IT.
I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BRING THIS OUT A LITTLE BIT, BUT SINCE STEPHANIE AND I TOOK OVER THE DEPARTMENT, WE HAVE BEEN AUDITING AND CHECKING THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT ON EVERY PROCESS THAT WE DO.
AS A RESULT OF THAT, AS ONE OF OUR CITIZENS HAS ASKED ABOUT, ARE WE REALLY CHECKING THESE THINGS OUT THOROUGHLY? THAT'S HOW WE DISCOVERED THIS, WAS BECAUSE WE WERE DOING THIS.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I COME INTO A DEPARTMENT AND I SEE IF THERE ARE PROCESSES THAT HAVE GAPS IN IT, THEN THAT'S WHAT I NEED TO FILL AND FIGURE OUT, HOW DO WE MAKE SURE THAT THOSE THINGS DON'T HAPPEN? WHEN WE DID THAT, WE DISCOVERED IT.
[02:30:02]
THAT'S A GOOD THING, AND WE'VE NOT ONLY TAKEN THE MEASURES AGAINST THOSE AREAS WHERE IT WAS HAPPENING, WE'VE ALSO CLEAN THAT UP ACROSS THE DEPARTMENT.OVERALL, IT'S DONE WELL BECAUSE IT'S HELPED OUR DEPARTMENT HAVE MUCH BETTER PROCESSES TO MAKE SURE THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN AGAIN.
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT. IT'S GOOD WHEN INTERNAL CONTROLS CATCH THINGS AS OPPOSED TO FINDING OUT OTHERWISE.
>> IT CAN BE PROBLEMATIC WHENEVER FOLKS THAT ARE PUT IN POSITIONS THAT CAN MAKE THOSE DECISIONS, AND IF THEY'RE CRIMINALS, THEY DO CRIMINAL THINGS.
>> LUCKILY, IN THIS CASE, THE CRIMINALS CAUGHT, AND THEY'RE PUT IN JAIL.
>> I JUST WANT TO EXPAND UPON THAT, THAT WE DO HAVE CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE HIRED INTO THE CITY OF AMARILLO, ESPECIALLY IN FINANCIAL TYPE ROLES.
WE DO BACKGROUND CHECKS AND SOME OF THAT STUFF AS WELL.
I JUST WANTED TO STATE THAT AS WELL, BUT I THINK TO JASON'S POINT THAT IF SOMEONE IS COMPELLED TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT, AND IF THEY CAN FIND A WAY, THEN AT TIMES IT'S CHALLENGING FOR US TO STOP IT.
>> I'D LIKE TO MENTION ONE OTHER THING THAT DURING THE PROCESS OF THESE THINGS, EVERY YEAR WE GO THROUGH AN EXTERNAL AUDIT.
WE ARE AUDITED BY AN EXTERNAL FIRM THAT COMES IN TO CHECK US.
EVERY YEAR, HUD ACTUALLY AUDITS SOME PROGRAM OF OURS.
SOMETIMES IT'S TWO OR THREE DIFFERENT PROGRAMS. WE WENT THROUGH SEVERAL HUD-LED AUDITS THAT NEVER CAUGHT ANY OF THIS.
THAT'S HOW SOPHISTICATED THESE PEOPLE WERE ABOUT TRYING TO COVER THAT UP.
THEY WERE USING SOME OF THE COVID WAIVERS THAT WERE PUT IN PLACE BY HUD TO ALLOW MONIES TO BE SPENT EASIER.
THEY USE THOSE WAIVERS IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DO THIS, WHAT THEY WERE DOING.
UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE NOT THE ONLY COMMUNITY THAT THIS HAS HAPPENED.
IT HAPPENED A LOT DURING COVID BECAUSE OF THOSE WAIVERS.
I KNOW FOR US, IN THE FUTURE, WE WILL NEVER USE WAIVERS AGAIN.
WE WILL ALWAYS DO THE PROCEDURES AS LONG.
AS I'M IN CHARGE, WE WILL GO THROUGH THESE VERY STRENUOUS HOOPS THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH BEFORE WE DISSEMINATE MONEY.
>> I BELIEVE I HAVE MR. STUDER, WHO'D LIKE TO OFFER COMMENT.
>> LEE STUDER, I LIVE IN THE CITY LIMITS.
I JUST RECENTLY REJOINED THE BOARD, BUT SPEAKING OF INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE, MANY YEARS AGO, FOR ABOUT FIVE, SIX YEARS, I WAS ON THIS SAME BOARD DOING THE SAME WORK.
WHEN I THOUGHT ABOUT VOLUNTEERING AGAIN, AND THEN THAT STORY HIT, IT RAISED QUESTIONS FOR ME AS GOING TO BE A COMMITTEE MEMBER ABOUT WHAT HAD TAKEN PLACE TO TIGHTEN THAT UP.
I WOULD LIKE TO ASSURE NOT ONLY THE COUNCIL BUT THE CITIZENS, I AM 100% CONVINCED THAT JASON AND THIS TEAM HAVE DONE NOT ONLY WHAT THEY NEEDED TO, BUT ARE COMMITTED TO DOING WHAT THEY NEED TO DO MOVING FORWARD, AND THEIR HEART IS 100% DOING THINGS RIGHT TO HELP THE MOST PEOPLE TO IN EFFECT THEN HELP THE CITY OF AMARILLO.
I JUST WANTED Y'ALL TO KNOW THAT FROM A CITIZEN THAT'S JUST VOLUNTEERING HIS TIME ON A COMMITTEE.
WE'RE IN REALLY GOOD HANDS WITH THIS TEAM RIGHT NOW. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MR. STU. DO YOU HAVE ANYONE ELSE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO OFFER PUBLIC COMMENT? AT THIS TIME, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 10B?
>> I MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 722-25-3.
>> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND FROM PLACE 2.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
MS. STEPHANIE, ARE YOU BACK UP ON THE NEXT ONE?
>> YES. THE SECOND ITEM IS ALSO FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, AND THEN YOUR CONSIDERATION.
THIS WOULD BE THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING.
THIS IS FOR THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN.
THIS IS ESSENTIALLY JUST THE FIRST YEAR OF FUNDING THAT WE TALKED ABOUT IN THAT CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
THE 2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN INVOLVES FUNDING FOR CDBG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT.
WE HAVE BEEN AWARDED A LITTLE OVER $1.6 MILLION FOR THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR STARTING OCTOBER 1.
WE WILL INVEST THAT IN PUBLIC SERVICES WITH THE 15% CAP.
YOU CAN INVEST UP TO 15%, AND THAT'S OUR INTENTION.
THOSE ORGANIZATIONS INCLUDE THE GUYON SAUNDERS RESOURCE CENTER, MARTHA'S HOME, MAVERICK BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB,
[02:35:01]
SALVATION ARMY, ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE AND AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME.THOSE WOULD BE THE SUB RECIPIENTS OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF AMARILLO, AND THEN COMING HOME.
WE'LL ALSO RECEIVE A PORTION OF THAT FUNDING FOR PUBLIC SERVICES.
PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION IS CAPPED AT 20%.
THAT'S TO CARRY OUT THE ACTIVITIES AND SALARIES FOR THE GRANT TEAM AND ADMINISTRATION.
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE PARKS AND SIDEWALKS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT, DEMOLITION AND CLEARANCE FOR DANGEROUS STRUCTURES, $200,000 AND OWNER OCCUPIED IMPROVEMENTS.
WE DO THE CARE PROGRAM FOR ANY URGENT REPAIR THAT CAN HELP A HOMEOWNER STAY IN THEIR HOME IF THEY QUALIFY BASED ON THEIR INCOME.
THIS IS A WAY TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS, AND WE'VE REALLY SEEN GOOD OUTCOMES FROM THE USE OF THOSE DOLLARS.
THE HOME ALLOCATION IS ABOUT $667,000.
PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION IS CAPPED AT 10% FOR THIS PARTICULAR FUND.
THE CHDO, OR THE COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION IN WHICH WE PARTNER WITH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, WE MUST DEDICATE AT LEAST 15% OF HOME DOLLARS TO NEW CONSTRUCTION AND A MAXIMUM OF 5% TOWARD THEIR OPERATIONS.
HABITAT AT THIS TIME IS OUR ONLY CHDO IN THE COMMUNITY.
WE'VE PARTNERED WITH THEM FOR SEVERAL YEARS AS THEY BUILD NEW HOMES FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO QUALIFY FOR THEIR HOMES.
THEN TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE.
THIS PROGRAM IS A RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, A DIRECT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR THOSE WHO QUALIFY BASED ON THEIR INCOME.
WE ARE ACTUALLY USING IT NOT JUST FOR RENTAL ASSISTANCE, BUT ALSO DEPOSIT ASSISTANCE FOR PEOPLE WHO JUST NEED THE ASSISTANCE TO GET INTO THE HOME, BUT MAYBE DON'T NEED AN ONGOING RENTAL PAYMENT OR SUBSIDY.
THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT OUR ANNUAL ACTION PLAN, ALIGNING WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED PLAN WILL DO FOR THE FIRST YEAR.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM.
>> QUESTIONS FOR MISS RODARTE.
>> APPRECIATE THAT ADDITIONAL PRESENTATION.
AT THIS TIME, I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 10C.
[10.C. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 07-22-25-4]
DO I HAVE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NO ONE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 10C AND ASK FOR A MOTION.>> I MOVE TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION NUMBER 07-225-4 AS PRESENTED.
>> MOTION AND A SECOND FROM PLACE 2.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM 10D HERE.
[10.D. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 07-22-25-5]
MR. RIDDLESBERGER, ARE YOU GOING TO RUN THIS ONE FOR US?>> YES SIR, I WILL HANDLE THIS.
THIS IS THE EASY OF THE THREE.
WHILE WE WERE DOING OUR CON PLAN, OUR CONSOLIDATED PLAN, THE FIVE YEAR PLAN, AND OUR ANNUAL ACTION PLAN.
WE RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT WE NEEDED TO UPDATE OUR CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN.
I'M GOING TO TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT THE CPP IS.
BASICALLY, IT'S THE FRAMEWORK FOR HOW WE WANT THE PUBLIC TO PARTICIPATE.
THAT'S ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS WE CAN DO.
YOU CAN SEE IN OUR FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN, WE HAD OVER 200 PEOPLE PARTICIPATING WITH SURVEYS.
WE WENT OUT TO THE PUBLIC TO FIND THEM.
WE FOUND THAT THAT'S THE BEST WAY WE CAN DO THAT IS TO GO TO THE FOLKS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO GET TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PLANS.
THIS IS REQUIRED BY HUD FOR BOTH OF THE PROGRAMS THAT WE'VE JUST TALKED ABOUT, AND IT ENSURES TRANSPARENCY AND COMMUNITY INPUT, WHICH IS VERY IMPORTANT.
WHY DOES THAT INPUT MATTER? THE FUNDS ARE ADDRESSING THE THINGS THAT MATTER TO THE FOLKS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO HELP HOUSING, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS.
THOSE VOICES ARE THE ONES WE WANT TO HEAR FROM, THE FOLKS THAT THIS IS ACTUALLY HELPING.
IT HELPS US WITH INFORMED DECISIONS WHICH EQUALS BETTER OUTCOMES.
AGAIN, CDBG SUPPORTS LOAD OF MODERATE INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS.
IT FUNDS HOUSING, PUBLIC SERVICES AND IMPROVEMENTS.
STEPHANIE COVERED THAT VERY WELL.
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP SUPPORTS REHAB, RENTAL ASSISTANCE, AND NEW CONSTRUCTION.
HOW CAN CITIZENS PARTICIPATE? THIS IS WHAT THIS PLAN, WHICH WILL BE PUBLICIZED, PUT ON OUR WEBSITE AND AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.
THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TELLING THEM THAT THEY CAN DO IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE.
WE WANT THEM TO ATTEND PUBLIC HEARINGS.
WE WANT THEM TO PARTICIPATE IN THOSE COMMUNITY SURVEYS, AND THEN GIVE US WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THE PLANS THAT WE PUT OUT FOR THEM.
THESE ARE THE PLANS THAT REQUIRE THAT INPUT THAT WE HAVE TO BE VERY INTENTIONAL ABOUT TRYING TO GET INPUT FROM OUR PUBLIC, ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT THIS AFFECTS.
THINGS LIKE WHAT WE'VE JUST PRESENTED WITH STEPHANIE, SHE DID THE FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
WE'VE DONE THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN TODAY.
THEN WE ALSO DO THE CAPER, WHICH IS OUR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT THAT WE PUT OUT AFTER THE FACT.
[02:40:03]
WE'RE BRAGGING ON THE THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE OVER THE YEAR.THEN ANY MAJOR AMENDMENTS THAT WE HAVE THAT WE NEED TO BRING TO THE PUBLIC AS WELL.
THOSE THINGS WE'LL KNOW WHEN THEY COME UP.
HOW DO WE NOTIFY THE PUBLIC, AGAIN, LEGAL ADS IN THE NEWSPAPER? WE DO THAT IN BOTH THE ENGLISH AND SPANISH.
OUR CITY WEBSITE, SOCIAL MEDIA.
THE CITY WEBSITE IS NOW LOOKING FANTASTIC, AND IT'S VERY EASY TO FIND THINGS NOW USED TO.
IT WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT.
BUT ON OUR WEBSITE, WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT PEOPLE BEING ABLE TO NAVIGATE THAT WELL.
I KNOW EMMA DOES A GREAT JOB OF HELPING GET PEOPLE TO THE RIGHT PLACE AS WELL.
ALSO, OUR SOCIAL MEDIA, PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS, AND THEN OUR OUTREACH THROUGH THE COMMUNITY PARTNERS.
OUR COMMITMENT IS THAT EVERYONE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE AND BE HEARD.
WE DO HAVE ADA AND LANGUAGE ACCOMMODATIONS.
WE CAN HAVE ANY ISSUE THAT SOMEONE NEEDS IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE? WE CAN HELP MITIGATE THOSE THINGS.
WE ALSO HAVE RESPECTFUL CONSIDERATION OF ALL FEEDBACK.
HOW CAN PEOPLE GET INVOLVED? ATTEND A MEETING, TAKE OUR SURVEYS AND CONTACT US DIRECTLY.
WE WILL HELP WALK YOU THROUGH THAT.
WE LOVE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO PARTICIPATE.
I LOVE SEEING PEOPLE COME INTO OUR MEETINGS, AND WE WANT THAT TO CONTINUE AND WE WANT MORE PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE. ANY QUESTIONS?
>> QUESTIONS FOR MR. RIDDLESBERGER, COUNSEL. THANK YOU, SIR.
AT THIS TIME, WE WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 10D.
DO I HAVE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM.
SEEING NO ONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND PLEASE COME FORWARD, SIR.
>> I DIDN'T PLAN ON THIS, BUT TIMOTHY GASAWAY, HERE IN AMARILLO, TEXAS.
WHAT COMMUNITY PARTNERS DID YOU PARTNER WITH TO COME UP WITH YOUR DOCUMENT? THAT WAS MY QUESTION.
>> SPECIFIC TO ITEM 10D, THE QUESTION IS A LIST PERHAPS OF COMMUNITY PARTNERS THAT HELPED CREATE THIS DOCUMENT.
>> YES. SPECIFICALLY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS THAT THE CITY OF AMARILLO HAS IDENTIFIED AS DESIGNATED NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS.
>> MR. RIDDLESBERGER, CAN YOU ANSWER THAT ONE?
>> IS THIS ONE ON? CAN YOU HEAR ME?
>> AS FAR AS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, WE HAVE ACTUALLY, CONTRACTED WITH A FIRM THAT'S HELPING US WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND ANNUAL ACTION PLANS.
THEY WERE THE ONES THAT WERE CONDUCTING OUR COMMUNITY SURVEYS.
BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT IT TO SPECIFICALLY COME FROM US.
WE PROVIDED THEM WITH NUMEROUS DIFFERENT AGENCIES.
I KNOW THAT THEY WERE ABLE TO CONTACT.
MANY OF THEM, I KNOW, FOR SURE, DOWNTOWN WOMEN CENTER WAS ONE OF THOSE, ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE, SALVATION ARMY, FAITH CITY, MULTIPLE AGENCIES THAT WE WORK WITH AS FAR AS OUR NON PROFITS.
AS FAR AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, THAT WAS PROVIDED TO THEM AS IF THEY'VE NOT TALKED WITH YOU AND YOUR GROUP, I DON'T KNOW.
THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AS FAR AS ADDING ANYTHING SPECIFIC TO THESE PLANS, AND WE'D LOVE TO HAVE YOU INCLUDE THAT.
WE CAN INCLUDE THAT IN THE PUBLIC DOCUMENT.
>> I UNDERSTAND WHERE WE'RE AT NOW, I WILL NOT BE HAPPY IF THIS CONTINUES.
YOU HAVE AN ABILITY TO REACH OUT TO NORTH HEIGHTS.
YOU'RE NOT UTILIZING IT BECAUSE YOU'RE GETTING FAILURE BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING THROUGH ONE ORGANIZATION.
IF WE DON'T GET THE INFORMATION.
>> WE DO PARTICIPATE WITH NORTH HEIGHTS.
WE'VE GOT A GREAT PROJECT THAT'S HAPPENING RIGHT NOW IN NORTH HEIGHTS.
>> BUT THAT'S IN THAT ONE AREA IN THE PROJECTS THAT YOU'RE SPEAKING OF.
THERE'S MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO GET DIFFERENT PROJECTS IS WHAT I'M TRYING TO TELL YOU.
>> MR. GASAWAY, YOU ALSO ARE PRESIDENT, BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> WHAT I WOULD JUST OFFER, MOVING FORWARD, MAYBE WE COULD PLUG.
>> THE CHAMBER IN AS AN ADDITIONAL CONTACT POINT THERE BECAUSE I DO KNOW THE NORTH HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN CONTRIBUTING AS WELL.
>> I THINK WE'RE GLAD TO MAKE THAT CONNECTION. THANK YOU FORWARD.
>> ANYBODY ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO OFFER PUBLIC COMMENT HERE TODAY?
>> AT THIS TIME, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 10D AND ASK FOR A MOTION.
>> I'D MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 07-22255 AS PRESENTED.
>> MOTION AND A SECOND FROM PLACE 4.
[02:45:02]
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES ON 10D. MOVING RIGHT ALONG.
>> NOTICE A COUPLE OF PLACES ON THERE WHERE WE'RE FUNDING DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES THAT, IS THAT THE ONLY MONEY THAT WE HAVE TO DO THAT, OR IS THE OTHER MONEY THAT WE'RE RECEIVING TO DO THOSE STRUCTURES.
>> WE ALSO HAVE MONEY BUILT INTO THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET THROUGH CITY MARSHALS.
>> I BELIEVE WE INCREASED IT OVER THE LAST TWO BUDGET CYCLES, AND IT'S REALLY PROVEN TO BE GOOD.
I KNOW OUR CITY MARSHALS WORK REAL HARD OUT THERE.
WE'VE SEEN MASSIVE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE OVERALL CLEANUP AROUND TOWN, STILL GOT WORK TO DO, BUT CITY MARSHALS DEPARTMENT, WE APPRECIATE THEM OVER THERE, NOT THE FUNNEST OF JOBS.
BUT THE FUNNEST OF JOBS IS OBVIOUSLY BRADY KENDRICK,
[10.E. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 8203]
WHO IS OUR FAVORITE PRESENTER HERE TODAY BRINGING FORWARD ITEM 10E.>> GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR, COUNCIL.
THIS IS A CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 8203.
THIS IS THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE VACATING A 10 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN LOTS 2A2C2D, BLOCK THREE AMARILLO MEDICAL CENTER UNIT 4.
THIS IS IN POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS, IN THE VICINITY OF AMARLILO BOULEVARD AND KILGORE DRIVE, AND THE APPLICANT IS PARKHILL FOR THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM.
THIS IS THE SITE OF THE PANANDLE STATE HOSPITAL FACILITY THAT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND THIS EASEMENT IS LOCATED WITHIN THAT PROPOSED SITE.
IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO BE UTILIZED AS THIS PROPERTY IS MULTIPLE LOTS AND IT IS GOING TO BE THE POTENTIAL ROUTING FOR UTILITIES FOR THOSE LOTS HAD EACH DEVELOPED INDIVIDUALLY WITH THAT NO LONGER BEING THE CASE.
THERE WERE NEVER UTILITIES PLACED WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, THAT EASEMENT IS THE LOCATION APPROXIMATELY OF THE PARKING LOT FOR THE PROPOSED STATE HOSPITAL FACILITY AND IS THE REASON THEY ARE REQUESTING A VACATION OF THIS EASEMENT.
WE SEND THIS OUT TO THE CITY UTILITY DEPARTMENTS AND ALSO THE FRANCHISE UTILITY COMPANIES WE WORK WITH AND NONE OF THEM OBJECTED TO THE ABANDONMENT OF THIS EASEMENT.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS ABANDONMENT WITH A 6-0 VOTE.
>> QUESTIONS FOR BRADY, COUNSEL.
YOU HAVE A CONSIDERATION BEFORE YOU?
>> MOVE TO ADOPT AUDIT 8203 AS PRESENTED.
>> MOTION AND A SECOND ON ITEM 10A.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY AYE.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE IT.
[10.F. CONSIDER AWARD - 2025 STREET PATCHING CONTRACT ]
ITEM 10F. WE HAVE MR. ALAN HARDER COMING UP HERE TO TALK TO US ABOUT SOME MORE PAVEMENT WE'RE GOING TO GET REPLACED.>> THANK YOU MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS WILL BE VERY QUICK.
THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL, THE CONTRACT FOR $2 MILLION FOR ON CALL STREET PATCHING SERVICES.
IF YOU RECALL, BACK IN APRIL, I PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON OUR ONGOING STREET PATCHING CONTRACTS, ONE OF WHICH WAS ALMOST WRAPPED UP AT THAT TIME AND HAS SINCE FINISHED.
THE OTHER ONE IS ALMOST DONE AT THIS TIME.
BEEN VERY HAPPY WITH THE QUALITY OF WORK THAT WE GOT OUT OF THAT.
IT WAS ASKED IF I COULD PUT TOGETHER A PLAN FOR RE AWARDING ANOTHER CONTRACT FOR SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR, BUT MORE FOCUSED ON LARGER AREAS, THINGS ABOUT ONE LANE WIDE AND LONGER STRETCHES OF PAYMENT.
WORKING WITH OUR PURCHASING DEPARTMENT, WE PUT TOGETHER A BEST VALUE BID FOR JUST THAT.
FOR A NOT TO EXCEED OF $2 MILLION, WE RECEIVED THREE RESPONSES ALL FROM VERY WELL QUALIFIED LOCAL CONTRACTORS.
LUCKILY, THE LOWEST UNIT PRICE CONTRACTOR WAS ALSO THE HIGHEST EVALUATED CONTRACTOR, ADVANCED PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, AND SO I'M HERE TODAY RECOMMENDING AWARD OF THIS CONTRACT.
WE'RE IN TIME WITH WHAT WAS PRESENTED AS FAR AS GETTING A PROCEED OUT JULY, AUGUST OF THIS YEAR, AND STILL HAVE SEVERAL MONTHS THIS SUMMER TO COMPLETE SOME GOOD PAVING PROJECTS BEFORE IT TURNS COLD.
WITH THAT, I'LL ASK YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
>> QUESTIONS, COUNSEL. MR. HARDER, WE APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'RE DOING OVER THERE, CARRYING OUT A GOOD PLAN.
>> WOULD REQUEST A MOTION ON ITEM 10F.
>> I MOVE THAT WE AWARD THE CONTRACT.
MENTIONED IN ITEM 10F AS PRESENTED.
>> MOTION AND A SECOND ON 10F.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
WE'RE GOING TO KEEP GOING HERE.
WE HAVE MR. DANFORTH COMING UP TO TALK ABOUT FIRE STATION NUMBER 14 READY TO GO.
[10.G. CONSIDER AWARD - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR FIRE STATION 14]
>> MAYOR, COUNCIL, I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO PRESENTING THIS TO YOU.
THIS HAS BEEN A CHALLENGING PROJECT.
AS YOU KNOW, THIS PROJECT ORIGINALLY STARTED OUT AS A SINGLE COMPANY STATION, WHICH IS WHAT IT WAS FUNDED FOR.
AS WE WENT THROUGH THE CHALLENGES ON THIS PROJECT,
[02:50:04]
LOOKING FOR REAL ESTATE THAT WE COULD ACTUALLY UTILIZE, LOOKING AT MULTIPLE OPTIONS, WORKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND WITH OUR ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, THE SIMS GROUP.WE WERE RUNNING UP AGAINST A BRICK WALL FOR A WHILE, LITERALLY IN SOME OF THE SITES THAT WE WERE LOOKING AT.
AS WE WENT FORWARD, AND AS YOU APPROVED IN THE BUDGET LAST YEAR, WE REQUESTED THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO UTILIZE A TWO-COMPANY STATION WITH SOME ADDITIONAL SPACE TO BE DEVELOPED ONCE WE DID LAND ON THE SITE TO BUILD ON.
SO IN GOING FORWARD, KEEP IN MIND, AND YOU WILL SEE THIS AT OUR NEXT AGENDA.
WE WILL HAVE AN ADJUSTMENT ON THE CONTRACT FOR SIMS ARCHITECTS ON THAT BECAUSE WE WENT FROM A SINGLE COMPANY DESIGN TO A DUAL COMPANY DESIGNED WITH CONFERENCE SPACE BUILT IN.
BUT I DO WANT TO SHOW YOU THE SITE.
IT'S AN EXCITING SITE FOR US TO MOVE FORWARD ON.
THESE ARE THE ARTISTIC RENDERINGS PROVIDED BY SIMS. WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS A TWO-COMPANY FIRE STATION AT QUAIL CREEK DRIVE, A TWO-STORY STRUCTURE OPTIMIZED FOR A SLOPED SITE.
MAYOR STANLEY, I KNOW YOU CAN IDENTIFY WITH THIS WITH THE SLOPE ON THAT SITE, IT IS A CHALLENGING BUILD.
FORTUNATELY, EVERYBODY WAS UP TO THE TASK TO ACCOMPLISH IT.
LOOKING AT THE WAY THAT THE SITE LAYS OUT AS WE LOOK AT THE FUTURE SITE, SLIDES, YOU'LL SEE WHAT THE CHALLENGES WERE.
THE BUILDING INCLUDES A CONFERENCE AND TRAINING SPACE TO BE SHARED WITH ALL OF THE AMARILLO FIRE DEPARTMENT.
KEEP IN MIND THE REASON FOR THE CHANGES AND THE NEEDS FOR THIS TO BECOME A TWO-COMPANY STATION.
SERVICE IS THE MEDICAL DISTRICT, WHICH WAS UNDERSERVED AT THE TIME AND STILL CURRENTLY IS.
THAT ALLOWS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO FILL THOSE HOLES, AND THAT REALLY IS A TESTAMENT TO THE COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND EVERYBODY INVOLVED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS FACILITY.
HERE, WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS THE FRONT VIEW AS YOU DRIVE DOWN QUAIL CREEK, THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT MOVING FORWARD.
THERE AGAIN, THE TWO COMPANY STATION VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SEE ON FIRE STATION 5 ON WASHINGTON.
THIS OVERHEAD VIEW SHOWS YOU THE CHALLENGES OF THE SITE.
NOT ONLY ARE WE DEALING WITH A GREAT AMOUNT OF SLOPE, BUT WE'RE DEALING WITH A TRIANGLE TO BUILD A FIRE STATION ON.
THE CHALLENGE IS TO BE ABLE TO GET FIRE TRUCKS OUT OF THERE TO RESPOND QUICKLY.
BECAUSE OF THE SLOPE, WE HAD TO DEAL WITH SOME DIRT ISSUES ON THIS TO MAINTAIN THE GRADES SO THAT WE CAN GET FIRE TRUCKS OUT IN BAD WEATHER.
HERE'S A BACK VIEW LOOKING BACK TOWARDS QUAIL CREEK, AND THEN BASICALLY WE WOULD BE OVER WEST AMARILLO CREEK AT THIS VIEW.
YOU CAN SEE ON THE BACK SIDE, WE DID DO SOME ADDITIONAL SECURITY IN THERE, BUT KEEPING IN MIND THAT THAT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND MAYBE USE FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IS AVAILABLE ON THE BACK SIDE OF THAT LOT GOING FORWARD.
WITH THAT, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> QUESTIONS ON STATION 14, GENTLEMEN.
NONE AT ALL. WE'VE NEVER LET JERRY GO THIS EASY.
LET ME THINK OF A FEW QUESTIONS.
>> I WAS GOING TO DO THE SIGN OF THE CROSS HERE AND SAY.
>> BEFORE YOU GET YOUR HOLY WATER OUT.
NO, IT'S BEEN A WHILE COMING, AND SO WE APPRECIATE IT.
BUDGET GREW A LITTLE BIT, BUT I THINK THE VALUE IS DEFINITELY THERE.
I THINK FREEMAN WAS PRETTY INSTRUMENTAL IN FINDING THIS LOT.
WE WERE TOLD COULDN'T DO IT, RETAINING WALL, ALL SORTS OF STUFF.
THEN WE KNOW THE ARCHITECT ENJOYED THE CHALLENGE, I'M SURE.
>> YOU GOT YOU A GOOD CONTRACTOR, SOMEBODY HERE WHO'S READY TO BUILD IT.
I THINK WE'RE READY TO KICK IT OUT AND GET IT GOING.
WHAT'S THE BUILD TIME LOOK LIKE ON THIS? WHEN WILL THEY START? WHEN WILL THEY FINISH?
>> AS SOON AS WE GET THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IN FRONT OF THEM, PLANES BUILDERS IS READY TO MOVE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
THEY'RE CURRENTLY ON ANOTHER PROJECT FOR US RIGHT NOW, BUT WE ANTICIPATE TO BE DOING A GROUNDBREAKING PROBABLY WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS.
>> WHAT'S THE TURNAROUND BUILD TIME YOU THINK?
>> I WOULD ESTIMATE WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO BE CLOSE TO WHAT WE HAD FOR FIRE STATION 5, WE TURNED THAT ONE IN 13, ALMOST 14 MONTHS.
>> TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THIS ONE? DO YOU KNOW ROUGHLY?
>> NOT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, I DON'T.
>> NINETEEN THOUSAND FEET. THEN THE REALLY GOOD NEWS, I THINK, IS, CURRENTLY, I THINK WE'RE READY TO STAFF THIS.
IF WE'RE NOT, THEN WE'LL TURN OUT ANOTHER ACADEMY. WE'D BE RIGHT ON IT.
[02:55:01]
>> YES. WE'VE GOT THE STAFF NOW TO STAFF IT.
WE BUILT THAT IN THE BUDGET THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS.
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE HELPING WITH OVERTIME.
>> THAT'S GOOD. WELL, ALL SYSTEMS GO FOR EVERYTHING, PUBLIC SAFETY.
YOU HAVE OUR FULL SUPPORT, AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO GETTING THIS CONTRACT AWARDED.
COUNCIL, WITH NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION.
>> I MOVED TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR 10G TO PLANES BUILDERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,395,120.
>> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING THAT ONE COME OUT OF THE GROUND.
GETTING CLOSE, WE'VE GOT TWO ITEMS LEFT.
[10.H. CONSIDER APPROVAL – TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AMARILLO, THE AMARILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE COATINGS, INC., DBA ASSOCIATED PAINTERS, INC. ]
BRING MR. NELSON BACK UP HERE TO WALK US THROUGH THIS INCENTIVE.>> I'VE JUST BEEN TOLD THAT THE SCREENS DO NOT LIKE OUR SLIDES.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE FLICKERING HERE. THANK YOU, MAYOR.
>> WE DO HAVE THREE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE COMPANY JOINING US TODAY.
MR. SCOTT OLSON, WHO'S THE GENERAL COUNSEL FOR IAC, MARTIN FORD, PLANT MANAGER HERE LOCALLY, AND HERB CURTIS, VICE PRESIDENT OF AMERICAN OPERATIONS.
WE APPRECIATE THEM JOINING US TODAY.
INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE COATINGS OFFERS AN EXTENSIVE RANGE OF AIRCRAFT FINISHING AND AVIATION SERVICES.
THEY HAVE BEEN AT THE RICK HUSBAND AMARILLO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FOR OVER 30 YEARS.
THEY CURRENTLY LEASE FOUR NARROW BODY HANGERS AND ONE WIDE BODY HANGER FROM THE AIRPORT.
THEY HAVE WORKFORCE OF APPROXIMATELY 171 EMPLOYEES.
THIS FACILITY DOES OPERATE TWO SHIFTS, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR.
THIS OPPORTUNITY, INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE COATINGS PLANS TO BUILD A 78,000 SQUARE FOOT WIDE BODY HANGAR IN ADDITION TO CONTINUING TO LEASE THE OTHER FIVE HANGARS FROM THE AIRPORT.
THIS WIDE BODY HANGAR IS EXPECTED TO HAVE A CAPITAL INVESTMENT OF $27.7 MILLION AND WILL ADD UP TO 70 FULL TIME EQUIVALENTS TO THEIR WORKFORCE, AND THEY WILL PAY THEM AN AVERAGE OF AT $55,000 PER EMPLOYEE.
THE MAP YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU IS THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IAC IS LEASING FROM THE AIRPORT.
THAT ADDITIONAL LEASE SPACE IS APPROXIMATELY 99,000 SQUARE FEET, AND THAT'S WHERE THEY WILL BUILD THIS WIDE BODY HANGAR.
THERE'S TWO THINGS THAT WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT TODAY.
THIS FIRST ITEM IS A TAX ABATEMENT.
THE SECOND ITEM WILL BE OUR LOCATION AND INCENTIVE AGREEMENT.
I'M GOING TO COVER THEM BOTH IN THE SAME PRESENTATION.
THE $27.7 MILLION IN CAPITAL EXPENDITURE UP TO 70 NEW FULL TIME JOBS AND AN AVERAGE ANNUAL SALARY OF $55,000 PLUS.
OUR JOB CREATION INCENTIVE IS $10,000 PER FULL TIME EQUIVALENT.
WE PAY THAT OUT OVER FIVE YEARS.
AFTER THEY PERFORM, THEY REPORT, AND THEN WE CUT THEM A CHECK FOR THAT INCENTIVE.
THEY DO GET A TWO YEAR RAMP UP UNDER THE LOCATION INCENTIVE AGREEMENT.
THIS WAS APPROVED BY THE AEDC BOARDER OF DIRECTORS ON THEIR JULY 15 MEETING, 5-0.
THE OTHER PROPOSAL IS, OF COURSE, THE TAX ABATEMENT PROPOSAL.
BASED ON THEIR LEVEL OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE AND THE AMOUNT OF NEW EMPLOYEES THAT THEY WILL ACHIEVE, THEY QUALIFY FOR 80% ABATEMENT ON THE IMPROVEMENTS YEAR 1.
THAT ABATEMENT DECLINES BY 10% EVERY YEAR OVER EIGHT YEARS.
THE AIRPORT LEASE AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED TODAY BY Y'ALL.
[03:00:02]
THIS IS A VERY BUSY SLIDE, SO I'M GOING TO JUST TAKE A MINUTE TO TALK ABOUT IT.THE BENEFITS, THIS IS THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THEM CREATING 70 FULL TIME EQUIVALENTS AND THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE $27 MILLION WORTH OF INVESTMENT.
THE BENEFITS TOTALED TO THE CITY OF AMARILLO ARE A LITTLE BIT OVER $5 MILLION.
THE COST OF THOSE BENEFITS ENDS UP BEING ABOUT $2.3 MILLION.
THE NET BENEFITS TO THE CITY OVER A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS IS $2.7 MILLION.
THAT AMOUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE VALUE OF THE TAX ABATEMENT, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY $394,000.
REALLY THE NET BENEFIT TO THE CITY IS MORE LIKE 2.3 MILLION.
JUST THE WAY THE SOFTWARE WORKS.
THE 80% DECLINING OVER EIGHT YEARS BENEFITS THE BUSINESS BY $394,000.
THE PROPERTY TAXES THAT THE CITY OF AMARILLO WILL ACHIEVE OVER THAT 20 YEAR PERIOD IS $2.4 MILLION.
THE NET COLLECTION, THE BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY IS $2 MILLION WORTH OF ADDITIONAL TAX.
I JUST WANTED Y'ALL TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THAT ECONOMIC IMPACT.
THE NEXT SLIDE IS WHAT AEDC'S IMPACT IS AND HOW LONG THE BENEFITS TAKE TO OVERCOME THE $700,000 THAT WE'RE PROPOSING THROUGH OUR LOCATION AND INCENTIVE AGREEMENT.
AS YOU CAN SEE, AT $10,000 PER JOB, UP TO 70 JOBS.
WE GOT A 94.8% RATE OF RETURN, AND THE PAYBACK PERIOD IS 1.3 YEARS.
THAT IS THE END OF MY PRESENTATION.
TODAY, WE'RE ASKING YOU ALL TO APPROVE IN THIS AGENDA ITEM, THE TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AMARILLO AND INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE COATINGS.
THAT'S AN 80% TAX ABATEMENT THAT GOES DOWN BY 10% EACH YEAR OVER EIGHT YEARS.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.
DO WE GET ONE OF THOSE ON EVERY PROJECT THAT COMES THROUGH THE AEDC?
>> THEN YOU HAVE ONE, AN ECONOMIC IMPACT TO THE AEDC AND THEN THE IMPACT REPORT FOR EXPANSION ONLY?
THIS DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE 171 JOBS THEY CURRENTLY HAVE AT THE SITE, NOR DOES IT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE OVER $9 MILLION WORTH OF PAYROLL AT THAT SITE? THIS IS ONLY THE EXPANSION.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. NELSON?
>> I'M SORRY AHEAD. A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS I HAVE.
I DON'T KNOW IF JUST MAYBE SOMEONE FROM IAC CAN ANSWER THIS BECAUSE I'M JUST INTERESTED IN KNOWING THIS, BUT HOW MANY PLANES DO YOU PAINT ANNUALLY NOW? WHAT WILL THIS ENABLE YOU TO DO IN THE FUTURE?
>> I CAN SPEAK TO HOW MANY THEY PAINTED LAST YEAR.
IT WAS 181 FOR OEM CUSTOMERS, THEIR CUSTOMER BASE.
THEY SERVICED 181 PLANES OUT OF THIS FACILITY LAST YEAR.
>> IF YOU WANT TO COME UP, THAT WAY PEOPLE CAN HEAR YOU AND I'VE JUST GOT TWO OTHER QUESTIONS AND MAYBE YOU'D BE MORE. THANK YOU.
>> YEAH, SCOTT OLSON. IT DEPENDS ON THE MIX THAT WE GET IN THERE.
IF IT'S ALL WIDE BODIES, IT'S LESS AIRCRAFT PER YEAR, IF IT'S NARROW BODIES, TWO AT A TIME.
OBVIOUSLY, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE SHORTER PAINT TIMES AND MORE AIRCRAFT, BUT SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 40 AND 60 AIRCRAFT WOULD BE A GOOD ESTIMATE, AND ADDITIONAL NEW HANGER.
>> THEN WHO IN GENERAL ARE YOUR CLIENTS? WHOSE PLANES ARE WE SEEING HERE?
>> YOU'RE GENERALLY GETTING UNITED AMERICAN.
YOU'RE GETTING SOME CARGO PLANES IN HERE FOR THE WIDE BODY.
YOU'RE GETTING AEROMEXICO'S IN THERE RIGHT NOW.
YOU'LL SEE BASICALLY ALL OF US AND SOME INTERNATIONAL PAIRS.
>> WHAT'S THE REASON FOR THE EXPANSION? WHAT OPPORTUNITIES WILL YOU HAVE THAT YOU DON'T HAVE NOW WITH THIS EXPANSION?
[03:05:03]
>> WELL, THE AIRCRAFT PAINTING MARKET IS PRETTY SAT, THERE'S MORE DEMAND IN SPACE, AND IT'S HIGH BARRIER TO ENTRY.
BUILDING THESE HANGARS, THEY'RE EXPENSIVE AND TAKE A LONG TIME AND THERE'S COST OF MONEY AND ALL THESE THINGS.
THERE'S JUST MORE AIRCRAFT THAT NEED TO BE PAINTED THAN THERE ARE SLOTS, SO WE'RE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF.
>> IS THERE A SIZED AIRPLANE THAT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PAINT OR WILL YOU BE ABLE TO HANDLE ANY SIZE?
>> I THINK A380 WOULD FIT IN THERE, BUT THOSE AREN'T REALLY AROUND FOR PAINTING ANYWAY, BUT WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE 777X IN THAT FACILITY, WHICH MAKES IT VERY INTERESTING FOR OEMS, POTENTIALLY, CERTAINLY FOR ALL OF OUR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? MR. NELSON, WE APPRECIATE THE, I'D SAY THE PRESENTATION, INCLUDING THE IMPACT REPORT.
VERY HELPFUL. THANK YOU FOR THAT.
SINCE WE HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS, I WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION ON ITEM 10H.
>> A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON 10H? ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY AYE.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES.
[10.I. CONSIDER APPROVAL – LOCATION INCENTIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AMARILLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE COATINGS, INC. DBA ASSOCIATED PAINTERS, INC.]
WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION ON ITEM 10I.>> MOTION AND A SECOND FROM PLACE 4.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON ITEM 10I WAS INCLUDED IN THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES WITH A 5-0 VOTE.
ITEM NUMBER 11 WOULD ASK FOR A MOTION.
>> WE GOT A MOTION AND A SECOND.
YOU'RE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU GUYS FOR ATTENDING.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.